Really Surprised!

everything you have heard about this movie is true.

Each character in this movie — down to the smallest one — is an individual rather than a type, prone to spontaneous changes of mood and sometimes amusing outbursts of pettiness or ill humor.

Yes, absolutely, there is fun to be had, as well as many, many things to go boom, all amid an atmospheric urban jungle.

This film is OK Like all the other reviews even I think that this film should have been made in the 70s or 80sThe film has Anil Kapoor's noble family taking charge of the village and making almost every decision It does look kind of weird as it's like their family is butting into the decision of every other family in the village There is also a side story which eventually goes into the main story and that is Shakti Kapoor who plays the villain of the filmDirection is outdated Music isn't very interestingAnil Kapoor doesn't suit the old role but is passable in the young role Rekha is brilliant Raveena Tandon is interesting in the first half Harish is bad Paresh Rawal is funny Sadashiv Ampurkar is good Shakti Kapoor is purely evil as the villain

T. Rama Rao made some extremely beautiful films in the 1980s, but he seems to be a filmmaker who cannot mature with the changing times, styles and fashions. He's like stuck with the same old-fashioned film-making style.Actors are not bad, not good either. Anil Kapoor generally acts convincingly his two roles of a father and his son, but the flawed script often makes him look funny and pathetic. Rekha is good, but then - she's always good, and here she's nothing more than such. She makes the best of what she is given, but she always does that. In conclusion, nothing great at all. Raveena is OK, which means ordinary, not bad, not good, nothing.This film is melodramatic, occasionally stupid. Maybe it's a delayed film? Well, even then it still would be below standard. The script is terrible, the film is overdone, and the story goes nowhere. It feels like a film made in the early 1990s, but the script makes it look even older, the style is like from the 1950s.Don't recommend, unless you're a big fan one of the starring actors.

Relentlessly violent potboiler with no redeeming features. Not even the violence is original, save for the seeming relish in battering the female members of the piece in a variety of ways.Oh yes. You'll see most types of abuse here. Raveena Tandon a Meena tries to be sympathetic as the wronged heroine wife of the outcast(e) brother but just ends up looking like any other once-glamorous actress marking time before she ends up playing grey-haired sainted mothers. Rekha just looks depressed. When they aren't being beaten up by the predictably demonic villain. There is a final scene where the pregnant Tandon is battered in an open arena whilst trying to protect husband Arjun, and immediately goes into labour/miscarriage, culminating in local village women surrounding the stricken Meena, and Rekha reuniting the female family members. This culminates in a perversely orgiastic scene where her face is splashed, porno money shot style, with Meenas' breaking waters. That was the only new thing I could see in this trashcan of a film.

I watched this movie thinking it was an old one from 1994 but then was shocked to discover it released in 2000. Everything about this movies says early nineties, Anil Kapoor in a double role neither of which suit him one to old and one to young. Rekha looks great and still performs with vigour but she looked like she was competing with Raveena Tandon on screen. Raveena Tandon looked great also and being such a brilliant and professional actress she rose above Rekha's childishness and produced a good performances first spoilt brat and then pregnant wife. The movie overall was not good flop through and through 3 out of 10 the 3 for Raveena Tandon.