Sorry, this movie sucks

ridiculous rating

This story has more twists and turns than a second-rate soap opera.

I didn’t really have many expectations going into the movie (good or bad), but I actually really enjoyed it. I really liked the characters and the banter between them.

A couple of centuries after defeating Kagan, the female vampire-human hybrid Rayne is now trekking across the Wild West, slaughtering any vampire she crosses. But she meets her match in Billy the Kid, a fearsome vampire gunslinger who has taken over the town of Deliverance with his army of vampire cowboys. Sensing that she'll need to get some help to kill these bloodsuckers, Rayne seeks out some bad hombres to help her in her mission.BloodRayne was the third video game adaptation that Uwe Boll had made in his career. The film became a laughing stock due to its poorly written script, ill-thought out story & the fascinating image of once-great actors effortlessly destroying their good reputations (namely Ben Kingsley) by appearing in trash like this. What nobody expected was for the film to get a sequel, let alone two of them. But that is what happened here.The film is a surprise for a sequel to a cheap trashfest that almost everybody hates. But Boll, who has actually got some talent up his sleeve, manages to do a better job than what he did two years before. Here he makes a vampire western with Natassia Malthe filling in for Kristanna Loken & doing a better job of it too. She actually makes the character of Rayne much more believable here than Loken's efforts. Michael Pare (the only actor to appear in all three current BloodRayne films) has a more substantial part here while Zack Ward does his best vampire impression as the villain. On the other hand, Michael Eklund is so OTT as the preacher that you wonder if he's been on an all-night acid bender before showing up for filming.But while the story is slightly more substantial than the original, BloodRayne: Deliverance is still a mediocre film. It has some shootouts but these are marred by Boll's insistence on using slow-motion for stylistic effect, something that makes no sense. I'm not particularly enthused on vampires being killed by bullets that have been rubbed in garlic (making cross-shaped marks on their bullets would have been more effective – if it worked for George Clooney, it will work here!) but the film does a slightly reasonable job in selling that idea forward.

"Bloodrayne 2" should be considered as an inept, dull, pointless, cheesy, but worst of all; boring movie.The movie's plot should be taken as a joke but no, it's supposed to be taken seriously. Western plot mixed with vampiric thematic that once had to do with Nazis? You bet.The movie takes plenty of time to finally get in action. There's absolutely no dynamic, interesting plot or dialogs. No action, no good gore, no scares, no suspense. NOTHING. This is a waste of film and shouldn't even be considered as a Horror movie.The acting and f/x are painful while the cinematography is truly for direct to video standards.Uwe Boll is a master on his own. And that means he's the mater of crap horror cinema.

The fact that the original Bloodrayne wasn't received with a cheer they decided to make a second part. We already know that it is tricky to make a franchise out of a movie, mostly the second part can't do what the first part did. Sometimes the second part is better than the first and sometimes the second part has nothing to do with the first part. Guess what, this second part has nothing in common with the first part, even Rayne is played by another actress. The only thing that refers to the first part is a necklace. Where did it go wrong, first with the DVD cover, you see Rayne in a sexy outfit, well, she never wears it in the movie. but the worst thing is the script, suddenly we are in the wild west. Not exactly a place were you would suspect a vampire. That alone, the wild west, could have been used to make an original movie but it isn't the script that is extremely bad, they also make use of real names like Billy the Kid who is a vampire, can it get worser. Billy is hunted by Pat Garret, a fact, but he is a vampire hunter. Man, this is trash. Billy a vampire, be real, do they think we go for it? And to get it worser out of the blue comes Rayne to help Pat. Anyway, no gore or bloody scenes, just one slash, the rest of the Billy the Kid gang is shot down, even Rayne doesn't use her anti vampire weapons that much. I just couldn't believe that they could make such a flick. If you want to see the wild west in horror watch Ghostttown instead

Today I saw Die Hard 4 and BloodRayne 2.Overall I was more pleased with BloodRayne.Somebody mentioned something negative about Vampire Cowboys...well there is nothing wrong with Vampire Cowboys.I thought that this was actually a cool film.Certainly not the best I've ever seen...but far from the worst...in fact I enjoyed this much more than many Hollywoood "BLOCKBUSTERS".Even if I had to pay for this movie, I would have enjoyed it...but since I didn't pay to see it...I enjoyed it even more......and damn did that chick look fine...I guess in the old west, they always had supermodel vampire hunters that had perfect teeth, ripe lips a perfectly structured face to go along with their flawless complexion and manicured nails.Oh well...what I missed in the old days of the wild west...