Instant Favorite.

it is the rare 'crazy' movie that actually has something to say.

The acting is good, and the firecracker script has some excellent ideas.

Let me be very fair here, this is not the best movie in my opinion. But, this movie is fun, it has purpose and is very enjoyable to watch.

Just created an account to say: (sorry about the poor review) This movie is crap. This is the kind of movie that you want to see because is so awful that is funny to see how they constantly fail in various attempts to copy some great movies scenes, some classic scenes, the WHOLE acting and the camera angles and movements. Finally i decided this movie worth to watch because this will perfectly teach you what is am horrible horrible (x100) movie in all aspects... (sorry about my poor English) ;) (i don't know about the director but i really hope this is his first movie because is a big and heavy learned from my fail... and if that phrase works he will turn 180 degrees in his work....

A military weapons manufacturer creates a chemical weapon that causes victims to become blood-lusting killers. A lab accident causes the building to go into lock-down and the employees are trapped inside with the crazed killers.The first thing I noticed about this film was the terrible acting, especially from the man who plays Bobby Lee (Robert Heath). But once you adjust to that (if you need to adjust), the movie is really quite fun. It is clear that the point of it all is to be a horror comedy, perhaps in a similar vein as "The Janitor". And while few films can reach the level of "The Janitor", this one has its moments.I need to talk about Alexis Texas' breasts (and more). I did not know who Texas was going into this film. I am more of a Dani Woodward fan. But as a 4-time AVN Award winner, I figured they had to showcase her talents somehow. And I was right. If you came to this movie to see Texas in action, you will get it (up to a point). Which raises an interesting question -- should porn stars going mainstream give audiences what they expect (like here) or try to really show their acting chops (like Marilyn Chambers in "Rabid", for example)? Texas says, "I really learned a lot from this experience." I am very curious what that would be. I suspect a low-budget film is not much different than porn. A bit more acting, and you get doused in fake blood, but otherwise what was there to learn? Maybe that you can call something "champagne" even though it is Andre brand? Or that the classic "Girl From Ipanema" in the elevator joke never fails to make me laugh? The best part of the film for me was the temp, played by Lauren Todd. I did not care much for her potty mouth, but she was quirky and spiced the film up. She was unconventionally cute and just had emotion and spunk that the other characters did not have. She makes me, a former philosophy major, wonder, do rent-a-cops have a "duty" or "moral obligation" to kill zombies? I would say no.Why did the film give thanks to the Foo Fighters? Maybe this is something better left unknown.

I understand the reason for $10.000 dollar films and the market for dollar rentals. This is America and it's your right to spend the dollar if you choose to. The market for super cheap films to stuff the machines sprouting across the nation is growing at an alarming rate. The writing here in this film is very, very bad and the acting matches it, in that respect they go together well. The cutting of scenes from a subject and or character in and out are frustrating. I am not a hater of low budget productions, i have enjoyed quite a few of them and yes some films are of course meant to be campy or not sincere to the art of the film industry but there are limits. Save your money..

I can't really see, other than the awful camera angles and even worse acting, where they spent any of the $75,000 budget on this "film".This piece of cinematic garbage reminds me of most porn I've seen "professionally" made since the 1990's - very little substance, horrible props, stock footage, cheesy acting, and the worst soft-core grinding I've viewed since the old Cinemax movies of the early 1990's.I think that since they secured the talents of Alexis Texas, porn "actress", they figures they had something to work on here. The majority of the cast have come from many other low-budget disasters and their acting chops are, let's just say, something to be desired.Boardroom scenes in mainstream movies always look intimidating, or so in your face, the scenes here made me laugh the most - and who has cobalt blue plastic flutes sitting around for domestic champagne? To tell you any of the plot would give away pretty much everything, so I won't - let's just say if you were to take the movies Outbreak, 30 Days Later, Shaun Of The Dead and a few pieces of softcore stuff and toss them into a blender, strip them of any budget and then pour it into a DVD this would be the result.Shoddy production values, a script with plots so old you can see the whip marks from where the last 10 owners had whipped it, combined with the "acting" talents of Alexis Texas (with the only thing she's good at: stripping down and showing off T&A) and you have a movie with worse viewing appeal than Poseidon, Waterworld and Gigli combined - and will have much less people wanting to watch this for anything except the floppy tiny "talents" of Alexis Texas.God, what a stupid stripper name... at least everyone else in this turkey is using their 'real' names... I think...Avoid this at all costs, no matter what they pay you to watch it for.