Blood Reaper
Blood Reaper
NR | 15 October 2004 (USA)
Blood Reaper Trailers

City people enter the cursed moutains, where madness dwells, and fall victim to the unseen predator foretold by legend.

Reviews
Actuakers

One of my all time favorites.

... View More
BeSummers

Funny, strange, confrontational and subversive, this is one of the most interesting experiences you'll have at the cinema this year.

... View More
Adeel Hail

Unshakable, witty and deeply felt, the film will be paying emotional dividends for a long, long time.

... View More
Lachlan Coulson

This is a gorgeous movie made by a gorgeous spirit.

... View More
pope_goat

This movie was so bad it was good. Somewhere between the continuity errors, lack of plot, vomit-inducing bad acting, terrible writing and effects, and elements that just plain sucked, this movie fell out of the horror genre and landed heavily into comedy. Note: -the random guitar carrying guy who wanders aimlessly back into the forest -the chase scene that is shot...in a manner worse than home movies i've seen -the pointless ax (he always carries it, but always uses the knife to actually kill people) -and the guy who looks eerily like a goose. I don't think i've laughed this hard in a long time. Kudos to the talentless retarded dumb-asses who created this movie.

... View More
shadowgirl10101

Gag me with a fork, this movie was so bad I paid $3.88 for it. My son took it to a shop that buys video's and got $6.00 credit for it. They called this Movie a Horror movie? When you have a killer wearing a gas mask running around killing people isn't a horror movie more like a serial movie that was poorly made one at that. I guess the horror for me was wasting $3.88 on Blood Reaper.The stars in the movie were not even known stars either, maybe the guy wearing the mask was known but I never got to see his face. Maybe he was too shy to show his face for fear of losing his standing in the movie business. When I put the DVD into my player and waited until it loaded. The movie reminded me of Blair Witch Project(which I did like), when it came to looking like someone's video homework. What was the budget for this film Blood Reaper? All I can say...Bad filming, bad clothing (the clothing was it boughten in a Second Hand Store?).When looking for a movie to rent or buy walk or run, run far away from this one.

... View More
bfan83

I was really looking forward to seeing this movie, once I found out Brinke was in it. Thus, I waited patiently....for 4 years! For a movie that took 4 years to be released, I expected much more, but I didn't receive that. It's your usual a group of twenty-something's, camping out in the woods, with a serial killer running around. Another thing that disappointed me was that "Scream Queen" Brinke Stevens was only in the first 5 minutes of this movie! Oh, what a let down. Anyway, there are some postives to this movie. The filming was professional. Although, shot on DV, the camera shots and editng were both strong, and the cast really did give it their all. My rating, 5 out of 10. It could've been much better, yet remains your typical, formulaic, slasher in the woods movie.

... View More
Joseph P. Ulibas

Blood Reaper (2003) is another crappy shot-on-digital-video movie that's stocked regularly at a local video chain store. I don't know why they stock these type of movies. They're plain terrible and for the most part unwatchable. I wish these films would just disappear from the face of the Earth. I wouldn't lose a wink of sleep if they did.This "film" is about a gas masked serial killer (swiped from one of my 80's favorites My Bloody Valentine) who stalks fishermen and drunk "kids" who are stupid enough to camp is a very dry and polluted section of forest. The cast is largely unattractive and can't act a lick. The filmmakers must have spent most of the alloted budget on casting Brinke Stevens (Her best years have long since past). They sure get there money's worth from Ms. Stevens.A movie like this doesn't have to be so lame. All you need is a decent script, a couple of actors who can act and a competent director. Alas this film has neither. The cast wears tight pants, the lighting is poor at best and the editing is pitiful. Worst of all the pacing needs to be worked on big time. The movie is a little over 70 minutes (which is the bare minimum to be considered a feature length film) but it felt like a three hour epic (that's bad). Even though the film has a short running time, the film is heavily padded.If you come across this movie in the video store run away. It's not worth the time and effort to actually sit and watch this lame attempt at film-making. There's no hot women, no gory set pieces and no fun. Do yourself a favor and get an older movie instead.

... View More
You May Also Like