This Movie Can Only Be Described With One Word.

Nice effects though.

If the ambition is to provide two hours of instantly forgettable, popcorn-munching escapism, it succeeds.

The film may be flawed, but its message is not.

In Afghanistan, Canadian journalist Luke, who also occasionally narrates the movie, is dressed like a woman would be under the Taliban. He is accompanied by a group of men, most of whom don't speak English, and Mateen, his "fixer", who translates and tells him what he needs to know.It is rumored that Americans cut off the fingers of certain people they kill. Luke believes he is seeing this happen but his camera gets shot and there goes the evidence.Back in Canada, Luke's newspaper won't run the story. But he is determined to go back and get his evidence, without the support of his paper. Actually, the way he behaved toward his editor Mark, he doesn't have a job.Luke's friend Tom, who looks like a hippie and has a sarcastic attitude, wants to go to Afghanistan too, and he gets his mother to finance the trip. Once back in Afghanistan, Luke claims to be working on a story about the drug industry--Afghanistan is a leading producer of heroin. Tom claims to be working on a documentary for CNN, and the beautiful girl he is interested in, an entertainer named Miss Freedom, believes him. Imran, who already knew Luke, works for The New York Times and he believes he has an edge over the others.The three journalists get sent with a group which includes Elita, an attractive woman from Latvia, who assists with communications. Mateen joins Luke once again, after some effort. They are going to visit his uncle, who has some knowledge of the situation. Tom poses as a record executive to meet with a big shot in a suit named Assad whose nephew is an aspiring rapper with no talent (to hear an actual rapper, wait for the closing credits). Ustad Mir is a cab driver who picks up some of the group when they get left behind.Tom and Luke get separated from Imran and the main group and experience the horrors of war and meet some interesting characters, such as the Brooklyn plumber who insists poor sanitation and water quality are killing more people than the war. Mateen, who is mostly comic relief, has a chance to be more than that when he experiences a tragedy.Is this movie worth seeing? It might be. It helps us to understand what our people are going through in a war that doesn't meet any of the traditional definitions. Mateen gives Luke an important quote which essentially means "There are no enemies. Only future allies." The reverse is also true.And the people are poor and have to do what it takes to get by. Someone is making billions from the drugs, but not these people, and they resent being told what to do by outsiders.This isn't a comedy, but for those who prefer comedy, there's just enough to make the movie tolerable. The quirky characters are enjoyable.It's not exactly family friendly, with numerous instances of the sound going out and a character's mouth blurred, middle fingers blurred (I assume), and the reality of war. For a movie about war, though, this is not that violent. I actually saw the fourth "Rambo" movie the day I saw this, and that was far worse.It's not a classic, but maybe if you like war, it's something worth seeing.

The first thing that bothered me about this movie was it was filmed in Nova Scotia. I don't expect a movie crew to film in Afghanistan but come on-...Nova Scotia? Nick Stahl who is a good actor and starred in the Oscar Winning Movie re: IN THE BEDROOM and also THIN RED LINE is sorely in the wrong element here and at the mercy of a poor screenplay. The linear plot line of this movie jumps around like a BB in a bathtub. The plot of the movie failed to have important meaning to me especially after watching the gem of a journalist movie THE BANG BANG CLUB, which you identified which each and every journalist in the field. The journalists in THE BANG BANG CLUB were not in a traditional war but had a brotherhood of camaraderie to their group. This movie had most of the journalists constantly confrontational and their was no caring for each other. The screenplay was tepid and slow and ended with a dud. Nick Stahl can do much better than this. I gave this 2 out of 10 instead of a one only because of Nick Stahl past achievements.

"It's a war, my job is to report what I see." When journalist Luke Benning (Stahl) is on a job in Afghanistan he catches a Canadian sniper cutting the fingers off of his taliban kills. When his paper refuses to print the story he quits and returns to the country to investigate further but soon finds that the fighting and tension has become much worse then when he left. There have been a recent influx of "embedded reporter" movies lately but they have all to this point been entertaining. While this was also a good movie and kept me interested it is basically another version of movies like "5 Days To War" or the "Bang Bang Club" (both of which I thought were better). Stahl does a good job and the movie is tense and thought provoking but like so many movies lately it seems to just copy everything else that is being released. I did like this one but "Bang Bang Club" was a better version. Overall, a movie worth watching but a new idea was needed to make it stand out. I give it a B-.

This movie was a ton of fun to watch, yet still does an excellent job of pointing out how complex and confusing the situation in Afghanistan is. I was shocked to discover this movie was shot in BC as it gave the feeling of the dusty, wide open spaces of Afghanistan. The plot twists and turns in a haphazard way which the professional critics disliked, yet I feel that it matches the nature of a country in turmoil, where humour and horror are combined in unexpected ways. Even though it is difficult to see a solution to the current situation in Afghanistan, I found it encouraging to see the characters grow as the country affects them.