One of the worst movies I've ever seen
... View MoreFantastic!
... View MoreAs somebody who had not heard any of this before, it became a curious phenomenon to sit and watch a film and slowly have the realities begin to click into place.
... View MoreThe story, direction, characters, and writing/dialogue is akin to taking a tranquilizer shot to the neck, but everything else was so well done.
... View More"A Stranger is Watching" from 1982, is a gritty story and manages to be a cut above the usual film versions of Mary Higgins Clark's book. Normally these have been produced by Grosso-Jacobsen, and the films are made in Canada and use Psycho-type screechy music. They have one B or C-list American star, and the rest are Canadian actors.This film, made earlier than many of the others, stars Rip Torn and a young Kate Mulgrew in her "Ryan's Hope" days, wearing more dead animals than I've ever seen. It also features James Naughton and my old acting teacher, Stephen Strimpell, and is filmed in New York.The story concerns the aftermath of the horrid rape and murder of a woman while her 8 year old daughter, Julie, watched helplessly from the stairs.It's three years later, and that man is going to be sentenced to death. However, the now 11-year-old girl and a reporter, Sharon (Mulgrew), who is also her father's girlfriend, are kidnapped. The kidnapper (Torn) holds the dad (Naughton) up for $180,000, the money put in trust for his daughter from his wife's estate. The kidnapper has great familiarity with the bowels of the city, where the subway runs, and that's where he hides his victims. Can they escape? Or can someone find them?There are tense and suspenseful parts of this film, but it moves slowly. As to being a cut above, one might ask why it's only getting a 6, which is what I usually give Mary Higgins Clark's films. Well, it's only getting a 6 because this is a violent and sleazy story. There is no character development. I'm sure the book is better.
... View MoreSeeking out "A Stranger is Watching" was somewhat of a new experience for me I'm a big movie fanatic and I hardly read any books, but in this case I was familiar with the work of novelist Mary Higgins Clark before I ever saw a movie that was based on her writings. Clark certainly isn't the greatest suspense fiction writer in the world, as her books are often clichéd and predictable, but at least everything that I read from her was easy to digest, unpretentious and occasionally very tense (like for example the novels "I heard that song before" and "Two girls in Blue"). I haven't read the novel on which "A Stranger is Watching" is based, but it sure had an interesting synopsis that fits right into her area of expertise. The film is directed by Sean S. Cunningham, whose name is irreversibly linked to the slasher pioneer "Friday the 13th". Although often also quite sick and very exploitative, "A Stranger is Watching" is totally different and incomparable to "Friday the 13th", since the story centers on just a handful of people in a devastating situation, whereas "Friday the 13th" is simply about horny teenagers getting slaughtered. 9-year-old Julie Peterson traumatically witnesses how her mother fiercely gets murdered in her own house. Two years later, when an innocent person is about to be sentenced for the crime, the real killer returns to kidnap both little Julie as well as her father's new girlfriend Sharon. The psychopath, Artie Taggart, imprisons the two ladies in a hideout place underneath New York's central station and demands a 180k$ ransom. Julie's father and the police attempt to collect the money, while Sharon – as well as a couple of observing New York homeless people – battles her repulsive kidnapper. "A Stranger is Watching" is mostly tedious and not at all suspenseful, mainly because the identity and lame motives of the kidnapper are immediately revealed. Some sequences are quite grotesque, like for example when Taggart calmly walks across the crowded train station carrying a large bag on his shoulder with his sedated victims in it, but most of the time the film is overly talkative and dull. The surprise twists in the plot come across as forced and implausible and – as a viewer – you feel very little affection or compassion for the two damsels in distress. The killing sequences are vile and nasty, though, and the underrated Rip Torn depicts an extremely sadist & menacing villain, so "A Stranger is Watching" definitely holds some interest for 80's horror fanatics.
... View More"A Stranger is Watching" is a tale of a parent's worst nightmare, a film so angry and horrific, with graphic violence that doesn't really move the plot forward. It seems like a television movie with graphic footage thrown in to give it a movie theater release, taking it from a "parental guidance suggested" television warning to an "R". This is a shame because a few similar movies which told the human side of similar tales were able to be touching rather than exploitive. Another shame is the fact that the film is so well acted that you can't fault the stars, only the writers who took this down a road of ugliness from which it has not escaped.Young Shawn von Schreiber is extremely memorable as the early teen who as a child witnessed the rape and murder of her mother. Now on the verge of becoming a young lady, she is forced to re-live the situation with the public exposition over the upcoming execution of the man she insisted was the killer. But, as the title says, "A Stranger is Watching", and he has no intention of letting her live in peace even though up to this point he has pretty much gotten away with murder.Schreiber's father (James Naughton) is dating a pretty television reporter (Kate Mulgrew) who upsets him by recapping all of the details of the killing. His daughter hasn't quite accepted her as the new lady in his life, but when a mysterious stranger (Rip Torn) breaks into Naughton's home and kidnaps both Schreiber and a visiting Mulgrew, they are tossed together in a situation which can't help but make them closer, no matter how hard Schreiber resists.If only there had been more focus on the two women bonding and less emphasis on the violence which erupts when they end up in the bowels of Grand Central where arriving trains go through a seemingly endless tunnel filled with hidden nooks and crannies where homeless mole people reside and Torn keeps them prisoner. The two make various attempts to escape, but as per usual in films like this, they are just one step towards freedom when the villain strikes again.Mulgrew, just on the threshold of stardom, is excellent, and for "Ryan's Hope" fans, it is a thrill to see the original Mary Ryan playing a New York City reporter (just like Mary was) just a few years after that character's untimely demise. Mulgrew is unconventionally beautiful, her gorgeousness a combination of spunkiness, wisdom, a huge heart and eyes that speak volumes even without words. Schreiber is also very good too, and Torn is a horrific villain that is as scary as Freddy Krueger and Jason, even without a hockey mask or a scarred face. Some great character performances (Roy Poole, Stephen Joyce, Maggie Trask) are also worth mentioning, but when surrounded by such ugliness, that quality is lessened and you wish that they had been given a better script so this film could have been more memorable than it was.
... View MoreThirteen years before sitting in a Star Fleet captain's chair and going up against such alien homicidal monstrosities as the Borg, the Kazon, the Hirogen and Species 8472, Kate Mulgrew did battle with a homicidal monster of a much more mundane nature, in 1982's "A Stranger Is Watching." Based on Mary Higgins Clark's best seller of 1977 (which, to be honest, I've never read), the film shows us what happens when 11-year-old Julie Peterson (well played by Shawn von Schreiber)--who had seen her mother brutally raped and killed two years earlier--is kidnapped along with the woman (Mulgrew) who is dating her widower dad. The thuggish lout (Rip Torn) hauls the pair to the underground labyrinth beneath Grand Central Station, a hellish world unto itself, where he caches them and schemes to acquire his ransom. The film is a fairly taut thriller, into which director Sean S. Cunningham manages to generate more suspense than he had two years earlier in the overrated "Friday the 13th." A background score by the great Lalo Schifrin adds immeasurably to the tension on screen, and all four principals--including James Naughton as Julie's understandably desperate dad--turn in fine performances. Unfortunately, the story is a tad too simplistic for this viewer's taste. We never learn anything about the nutjob Artie Taggart, other than the fact that he wants to raise horses in Arizona; his background, and why he's chosen this particular moment to kidnap Julie, remain mysteries. If only the film's screenplay were as multilayered as Grand Central Station itself seems to be! Still, despite the unfleshed-out nature of the picture's most interesting character, the film does manage to keep the viewer riveted. Kate, post-"Ryan's Hope" here but still hardly a household name, is always wonderful to watch, and looks quite beautiful in this early screen role. And while Artie Taggart may not be as relentless as one of the Borg, he still manages to give the old girl a pretty tough time....
... View More