People are voting emotionally.

One of the most extraordinary films you will see this year. Take that as you want.

This movie tries so hard to be funny, yet it falls flat every time. Just another example of recycled ideas repackaged with women in an attempt to appeal to a certain audience.

An old-fashioned movie made with new-fashioned finesse.

This movie is obviously supposed to be social commentary more than horror. And this could be fine only it doesn't work out for me. It is about evils of technology but also about the evil rich (and of course white) society. I think it was overdone watching the girls showing how horrible they are. Them talking about their parents was a pretty eye rolling scene.When it comes to acting the young girls did a good job especially considering that for most of them this is pretty much the beginning of acting experience. Timothy Hutton who we know is a great actor seemed to be awful but this was just because of how his part was written. All that knife wielding at 12 year olds was just bizarre and seemed out of character. Chloë Sevigny was lucky she actually got a good character so she could actually show that she is good. Natasha Lyonne and Taryn Manning probably just know the director and wanted to give her their names as they are on screen for about 15 seconds. So yes it was pretty disappointing. Just a nice setting and camerawork which saves this movie from being a 1/10.

#Horror is a who-dun-it or 12 year old girls whose parents have no issue with a little swearing. The opening credits are done in about 30 seconds and are geared toward an audience that lives on their smart phone.A group of 12 year old over privileged girls are having a dress up party at Sophia's (Bridget McGarry) upscale house once owned by an artist who killed his guests and is still at large. Sam (Sadie Seelert) is the first out cast to the clique. She is a scholar student from the less than snob area of Greenwich (?), Conn. She was invited by Kat (Haley Murphy) our second outcast. She was picked on when her mother died and has returned the favor. She is bitter and angry. Our third outcast is the stereotypical fat girl ( Emma Adler). The girls pick on each other and they all agree "Being 12 sucks."Most of the film consists of a group of girls doing what unsupervised girls do being allowed to play with art, dress up with real diamonds and furs, and drink straight vodka. And in one case...eat cupcakes. There is a murder that happens in the opening scene, a man having sex in a Ferrari. Most people garage their Ferrari and Jaguars in the winter in Connecticut due to the salt thrown on the highways. Just saying.The movie was a bunch of young looking 18 year old girls acting as if they were 12. The irony is when they cast teen girls, they normally cast women in their twenties. The film contrasts how the girls act when they have their electronic devices living in their own world and when they experiment living without them sharing their lives. While this is a who-dun-it, I never really concentrated on that aspect.Your 12 year old might like it, if your are willing to let them watch it.Guide: F-word. Brief implied sex. no nudity.

#Horror is a movie that so desperately tries to be relevant, but falls short in so, so many ways. It is a movie that has many "artistic" features, many themes that it "explores", and so many terrible chracters to hate. The film attempts to be artistic, and in these attempts it tries to blur out the camera to "heighten" the "tension", and sporadically throws in shots of a supposed website that these girls use. However, this website does not look like any functional website, and I stared at it for most of the movie, attempting to figure out exactlky what it was and what purpose it served in the movie. And while you can justify footage of this website being thrown in, there is no way to justify the horrible design of it, and ultimately it just feels like the movie threw it in there hoping the critics would call the film "artsy". As stated before, the film has many different messages it attempts to get through with this film. The core one is bullying, however, it makes so many mistakes in the process. Firstly, the audience that is going to get the most out of the message have nobody to relate to. Preteens and teenagers who suffer bullying the most are the ones who can gleen from the anti-bullying message of the film the most. However, we are shown a bunch of rich, overpriveledged girls. These aren't the types of girls who are going to watch a film like this. Even the character that doesn't come from a rich background blends in with the rich kids. Second, you are given nobody to sympathise with because everybody is both a victim and a bully. Every single character (even the adults) join in the bullying to some extent. So where does that leave your characters? Who are you supposed to sympathise with? The answer is supposed to be the main characters, but after a while, you begin to wonder who the main chracter is supposed to be, and ultimately, you have nobody to sympathise with. The worst aspect of the movie by far is the character of Cat's father. When Cat gets lost in the woods after being thrown out of the house for how mean she is being, her father arrives at the house. He barges in and instantly begins shouting at the girls. Eventually one of the girls runs off into the woods to look for Cat, and he just lets her leave (which is what he is yelling at the girls for letting his daughter do in the first place). He grabs these girls by the head, and even by the necklace at some point, he slaps them, and even goes as far as to threaten them with a knife. And he isn't even the villain! The movie doesn't even work as a horror. The first hour and fifteen minutes is so heavily focused on the bullying drama that it forgets to create any ammount of tension. All of the killings of this "slasher" happen in the last twenty minutes And the reveal of the killer doesn't even make much sense. She kills people that have nothing to do with any of this. But why wouldn't it be her? After all, she is the meanest one who gets thrown out of the house. She is the one who is shown to be mentally unhinged from the beginning. So, why not her? Really there is no answer to this, but it would have been nice to have been offered some explanation as to why she killed everybody. If it's because she feels bullied, her rage is unjustified because she is the first one to be a true bully in the movie. It also wouldn't explain why she would have killed the couple at the beginning of the movie or even how she did it considering she was held up at school. It is such a shame considering these girls can act. They all portray themselves well as bullies and victims adding at least a small glimmer of realism to this movie, but their talent is completely wasted.

This movie is a confused, jumbled mess. It looks like the dialogue was mostly improvised on the spot. Worst thing I've sat all the way through in a long time. The 12 year old teeny bopper girls are downright annoying. The visual effects are headache inducing. The opening credits flash by so quickly that I had to look up on IMDb to confirm that I saw Timothy Hutton's name. Do yourself a favor and skip this. It's awful.