White Rabbit Project
White Rabbit Project
TV-PG | 09 December 2016 (USA)
SEASON & EPISODES
  • 1
  • Reviews
    Jeanskynebu

    the audience applauded

    ... View More
    Taraparain

    Tells a fascinating and unsettling true story, and does so well, without pretending to have all the answers.

    ... View More
    Dirtylogy

    It's funny, it's tense, it features two great performances from two actors and the director expertly creates a web of odd tension where you actually don't know what is happening for the majority of the run time.

    ... View More
    Philippa

    All of these films share one commonality, that being a kind of emotional center that humanizes a cast of monsters.

    ... View More
    Cookington12

    I'm really disappointed White Rabbit Project ended up as meh as it was. I've always enjoyed the trio's segments on Mythbusters and while it was sad to see them leave the show, I was excited to see what they could accomplish with their freedom on Netflix. Instead, the show feels like a very high budget YouTube top ten list with occasional experiments here and there.Each episode focuses on a general theme, such as superhero powers. Each of the three have two entries out of 6, generally with one being an experiment and the other being some small research and storytelling. At the end of every episode, the 6 entries are (supposedly?) averaged out and ranked on three criteria, like "how similar is it to the actual superpower." The problem I have with White Rabbit Project is that it doesn't play to the strengths that the trio had back in Mythbusters. Everybody works separately here, maybe showing up to an experiment as a test subject every once in a while, which is a far cry from their work in Mythbusters.I would only recommend watching this if you have nothing else to watch and you liked the trio's work back in Mythbusters. There's definitely some good episodes in here, don't get me wrong, but even despite those good episodes, the majority of this show is forgettable.

    ... View More
    Jared Reabow

    I am a tech enthusiast with qualifications in History, Physics, Engineering and Computing. I know what I am talking about and loved Mythbusters because so did they, but this show is like Mythbusters crossed with a tabloid and a reality TV show.This is the show a 8 to 16 year old could watch but for most other people is is dull.It is painful to watch the BAD CGI, I mean really bad mostly because it is so stupid and pointless! Floating screens and bad holograms that grant , Tory and Kari pretend to interact with just look so bad, it is really disappointing how much rubbish is in this show, the creators really banked on the Mythbusters trio attracting viewership but they don't have the quality of content to hold us.They trio said it best in the first episode when the mocked Tori's short movie clip, everything they said applies so strongly to the show itself.Then there is some stupid stuff they do, most is just funny or harmless but some is trash. In one episode they promote shooting down, smashing or otherwise disabling other peoples property which is very illegal and selfish! Or there is point where they pick trash situations over interesting ones like Hitler on estrogen when they could have picked something much more ludicrous and interesting.

    ... View More
    jensstark

    Mythbusters found out that you could not take the Build Team out of the show. Can you run a show using only the Build Team? And doing things similar to Mythbusters, without outright plagiarizing it? That's not an easy task.And, for season one, it didn't go too well. If there is to be a second season, it will need some adjustments here and there.The premise? Take a topic (Weirdest weapons of WW II, g-force and it's influence on humans, great escapes, just to give you examples) and pick six items related to it. Six weird weapons for example. Then, find three criteria to judge them by. Each of the three cast members takes two of them and demonstrates them. This can involve building something, like an electric car, it can be documentary footage, play scenes (some good, some bad) or a mix.But - less nerd porn. Slightly more Byron cleavage, though (and a looong sequence of her in underwear). While Mythbusters tried, in a scientific way, to prove or disprove a myth, explaining the science behind it and showing different methods of testing them (with varying success), the White Rabbit Project lacks experimentation. More often than not, you will see experts in their fields and hobbyists demonstrating something. Quite interesting, but as six different aspects of the episode topic need their time, instead of just two or three myths, it lacks depth there.Something is not quite right with the show. Yet. I'd love to see it succeed, though.

    ... View More
    Sam Cannon

    White Rabbit Project is the next project out of the "B team" of the now-finished show Mythbusters. Grant, Tori and Kari team up again to explore a variety of different themes and scenarios, with the same amount of stunts and gadgets.Essentially, each episode explores a certain topic. For example, episode 2 explores six different prison breaks, before ranking them on an arbitrary scale from worst to best. In order to do this, the show uses a mixture of replicating the thing in question, docu-drama style explorations of the history/origin of the thing in question, comedy skits with the team and/or actors, and interviews with experts in the field.The most pressing issue is that in many ways the show feels downscaled compared to mythbusters. There are less 'experiments' in this show compared to mythbusters, the show uses a lot more stock footage and low budget docu-drama segments than mythbusters ever did, which kinda sucks to be honest. In many ways, the show talks more than shows.While that is a letdown, it doesn't make the show 'bad' in any way. Tori, Grant and Kari are all still highly entertaining to watch. Their on-screen chemistry holds up, cheesy jokes and all, and when they do do stunts, those stunts are pretty impressive. Stuff like re-making a makeshift hot-air balloon, for example, or training a pigeon to drive a drone by tapping on a touchscreen. There's some good stuff in here.Also, a MAJOR plus due to the Netflix format is that the editing is far better and less annoying. If you remember Mythbusters, there was a lot of repetition in that show due to the ad breaks. If you were watching the show on DVD, the narrator would often say the same thing twice in a row because an ad break was supposed to be there in between. There's no issue here, and the show flows perfectly with no breaks or issues in pacing.If you have a Netflix account, this is certainly worth the watch, especially if you or your kid liked Mythbusters back in the day.

    ... View More