What on Earth?
What on Earth?
TV-14 | 10 February 2015 (USA)
SEASON & EPISODES
  • 12
  • 11
  • 10
  • 9
  • 8
  • 7
  • 6
  • 5
  • 4
  • 3
  • 2
  • 1
  • 0
  • Reviews
    ThiefHott

    Too much of everything

    ... View More
    Matrixiole

    Simple and well acted, it has tension enough to knot the stomach.

    ... View More
    Donald Seymour

    This is one of the best movies I’ve seen in a very long time. You have to go and see this on the big screen.

    ... View More
    Kaydan Christian

    A terrific literary drama and character piece that shows how the process of creating art can be seen differently by those doing it and those looking at it from the outside.

    ... View More
    michaeldecker-09230

    Granted, this show isn't GREAT, it makes me laugh reading the rest of the reviews here. I mean, I had no idea there was so many people that knew exactly what this show brings to the table in every episode! I mean, "what a sad excuse" of a show that talks about things that exist on Earth that can be seen from earth!

    ... View More
    adampadum

    Interesting show very thought provoking.and not everything can be easily explained

    ... View More
    Ethan E

    So I like this show sometimes. I am often pretty skeptical about what they say, but some of it ends up being interesting enough. My main issue with this show is there are WAY too many segments that they present a "mystery" and don't get to the bottom of it at all! And it seems like they should be able to many of these times. But it's pretty unsatisfying when so many stories just end up being "we don't really know the answer... but here's a bunch of nonsense".

    ... View More
    Joseph Pelatohri

    Here's the formula for this show:1. Search high and low for any sort of satellite image that can possibly be presented in an anomalous context.2. Omit key information / observations / facts, while using the narrator to mislead the viewers / present said "anomaly" as something extraordinary (e.g. aliens, government secrets, the end of the world).3. Present several (typically idiotic / ludicrous) possibilities (to eat up time), and then proceed to discredit said idiotic / ludicrous possibilities (e.g. Narrator's Voice (hyperbole): "A satellite caught glimpse of a giant pink blob in the sky over the Pacific Ocean, which has experts baffled. Some have suggested it could be a giant herd of pigs. This would certainly explain the pink appearance, but upon further inspection, seems unlikely as pigs aren't known to fly. Further, the blob covers an area of 100,000 square miles. If it is a herd of flying pigs, it would consist of more pigs than are known to exist in the observable universe").4. Present all the (initially omitted) facts / details, revealing the anomaly's true, (underwhelming) identity (e.g. Narrator's Voice: "When orbiting the earth, a satellite witnesses a sunset and sunrise every 90 minutes. At the time the anomalous satellite image was taken, the sun just so happened to be setting behind the Earth, resulting in a spectacular sunset, which manifests itself as a (wait for it)… pink… blob…").There might be one legitimate / actually interesting case presented every couple of episodes. Aside from that, it's just a bunch of lazy / manufactured, (often) downright idiotic filler content… Then again, I suppose that's pretty much all television these days

    ... View More