Waste of time
... View MoreCharming and brutal
... View MoreI enjoyed watching this film and would recommend other to give it a try , (as I am) but this movie, although enjoyable to watch due to the better than average acting fails to add anything new to its storyline that is all too familiar to these types of movies.
... View MoreThrough painfully honest and emotional moments, the movie becomes irresistibly relatable
... View MoreIdea was really good but I had stop watching it at half of episode. I just cannot watch even single episode this poorly edited show. Repeating and repeating same clips and explaining same things again and again. Just worst direction what I had EVER seen at any series. If this series come back with new script I totally want see. Currently it is just abysmal. Acting is not really good neither and some of content are quite surrealistic, but at this kind documentary it does not matter. What matter is that whole thing is just ruined so badly that I don't know how that editor and director even have the face to do that kind "job".
... View MoreThe editing has nothing to do with the FORMAT. The editing is very strong. The show is edited for performance, pacing, and story. The repetitive nature of the show, that reviewers don't like, is dictated by the network and NOT the editor. The editor is told to repeat moments at the head of every story, throughout the show. No editor in his or her right mind would repeat story beats as often as you are seeing. It's NOT the editor who is to blame. If performance is your issue, editors pick the best takes. The director is to blame for those problems. Accordingly, your comments should reflect how the show is "produced" which is where the show style begins and ends.
... View MoreI really got a kick out of watching the first three episodes. It was funny, shocking and embarrassing and the segments were actually real but for TV they are re-enacted versions of what really took place. I'm all okay with that. My only criticism is the editing of the show itself. Why? Two reasons: 1. It makes the show hard to follow and 2: They do too much repeating of what we already saw. For example, when I watch one show, they do a lot of jumping back and forth between segments, they have about 3 or 4 ER segments to fill the one hour show.One of the things that drives me crazy is that they keep replaying a lot of what was already saw which is a horrible waste of time. Each 1 hour alloted show runs about 41 minutes so when you factor in all the replaying that goes on, that cuts the show down to something like 39 or 38 minutes, which is crazy. For that reason, I'm knocking off 2 stars. My suggestion would be for them to complete one segment of the show before moving on to the next one. Doing it that way would make it much more easier to follow the show than the way they're doing it now.
... View MoreI understand that there will be commercials but there are way too many. On top of that, when the commercial break is over they repeat what I have already seen at least two to three times on each story. Most people will not forget what just happened 10 minutes earlier. The show is interesting but they switch back and forth between cases. I would like it better if they would just film one story at a time and quit repeating just to use up air time. They should put more substance in it. If they would, I would definitely raise the ratings. I am a great fan of Untold Stories of the E.R., Moonshiners and Say Yes To The dress.
... View More