Sex Sent Me to the ER
Sex Sent Me to the ER
TV-MA | 28 December 2013 (USA)
SEASON & EPISODES
  • 2
  • 1
  • Reviews
    Redwarmin

    This movie is the proof that the world is becoming a sick and dumb place

    ... View More
    StyleSk8r

    At first rather annoying in its heavy emphasis on reenactments, this movie ultimately proves fascinating, simply because the complicated, highly dramatic tale it tells still almost defies belief.

    ... View More
    Taha Avalos

    The best films of this genre always show a path and provide a takeaway for being a better person.

    ... View More
    Dana

    An old-fashioned movie made with new-fashioned finesse.

    ... View More
    Tapio Haapala

    Idea was really good but I had stop watching it at half of episode. I just cannot watch even single episode this poorly edited show. Repeating and repeating same clips and explaining same things again and again. Just worst direction what I had EVER seen at any series. If this series come back with new script I totally want see. Currently it is just abysmal. Acting is not really good neither and some of content are quite surrealistic, but at this kind documentary it does not matter. What matter is that whole thing is just ruined so badly that I don't know how that editor and director even have the face to do that kind "job".

    ... View More
    3acts

    The editing has nothing to do with the FORMAT. The editing is very strong. The show is edited for performance, pacing, and story. The repetitive nature of the show, that reviewers don't like, is dictated by the network and NOT the editor. The editor is told to repeat moments at the head of every story, throughout the show. No editor in his or her right mind would repeat story beats as often as you are seeing. It's NOT the editor who is to blame. If performance is your issue, editors pick the best takes. The director is to blame for those problems. Accordingly, your comments should reflect how the show is "produced" which is where the show style begins and ends.

    ... View More
    llamkuf

    The content is acceptable, throw-away entertainment.However, it was either edited by a child, or somebody trying to be clever. Each episode usually has 3 separate stories. Unfortunately, somebody thought it'd be a great idea to have a maximum of 2-3 minutes per story before switching over to a different story. It'd then chop back to the original, and then back to one of the others. There was nothing fluid or consistent with it. It becomes irritating and frustrating trying to follow each story. Additionally, there are too many repeats of what just happened.If they just split each story into two halves it'd be much better and less frustrating. I've watched 2 episodes, got annoyed, now I've deleted the series link and won't be watching any more. Which is a shame, because it could otherwise have be a good show and been scored 6+.

    ... View More
    omegal

    I really got a kick out of watching the first three episodes. It was funny, shocking and embarrassing and the segments were actually real but for TV they are re-enacted versions of what really took place. I'm all okay with that. My only criticism is the editing of the show itself. Why? Two reasons: 1. It makes the show hard to follow and 2: They do too much repeating of what we already saw. For example, when I watch one show, they do a lot of jumping back and forth between segments, they have about 3 or 4 ER segments to fill the one hour show.One of the things that drives me crazy is that they keep replaying a lot of what was already saw which is a horrible waste of time. Each 1 hour alloted show runs about 41 minutes so when you factor in all the replaying that goes on, that cuts the show down to something like 39 or 38 minutes, which is crazy. For that reason, I'm knocking off 2 stars. My suggestion would be for them to complete one segment of the show before moving on to the next one. Doing it that way would make it much more easier to follow the show than the way they're doing it now.

    ... View More