A brilliant film that helped define a genre

It's hard to see any effort in the film. There's no comedy to speak of, no real drama and, worst of all.

There are better movies of two hours length. I loved the actress'performance.

The movie's neither hopeful in contrived ways, nor hopeless in different contrived ways. Somehow it manages to be wonderful

Look, it's decent enough. It's interesting--it's cutting--but it's not funny. And isn't that the litmus test for a comedy?Every story is tragic, every character is tragic, every personality, quirk and inflection is tragic. Even the one-liners are laced with insecurity. The flimsy comedic packaging only serves to detract from what is otherwise a truly impactive tragedy. For that, I'd still give it an 8.But these are incredibly accomplished actors, capable of intensely gut-wrenching drama and seemingly effortless wit alike, yet the scenes in which they are high are no better performed than a particularly bad preteen's attempt in drama class. They are as convincing as the press release for a metal condom on the 1st of April. When portrayed well, drugs can be as everyday as a torn carrier bag or as frighteningly intense as the very best thrillers. If you're sucked out of the moment to ponder whether the actors have ever spent time with someone on drugs, or have been so wrecked themselves they only remember the glaringly obvious, it's just not done well. It's 'high' at the basest level. That's a point off.Another is removed for how blatantly political it is. The writer is painting a very clear picture of someone shouting "You ruined us! You ruined us!" with none of the accommodation of fallibility. She's right. They did ruin us, and it's a crying shame, but writing stories around an issue that all have the exact same moral doesn't give the issue any more depth. It actually does the opposite.Finally, I can't even remember smiling, much less actually laughing. Even Broadchurch gave us a couple of grins. If it's just going to make you depressed, can you really call it a comedy?

I have really enjoyed the first five episodes of this series, so much so that I have watched them all again, back to back.I largely agree with Andrew White's appraisal. I started watching because it was funny, but as the series has gone on, more and more unfunny, but deeply moving, things have happened. Characters who appeared to be quite flimsy at first become, when we know more about them, very credible people, damaged, perhaps, by what life has thrown at them, but doing their best to cope with the circumstances in which they find themselves. At the end of episode Five I am desperately keen to see the last episode - if only because there are at least two characters whose 'back stories' have not yet been disclosed.The writing both of the plot, and the dialogue, is first rate, and the timing and acting skills generally are wonderful. I would like to list my favourite characters and actors, but I cannot. This is ensemble work of the highest order - they are all excellent, and a very well balanced team.

I've not felt the need to write a review for IMDb before as there are usually hundreds most of whose authors which fall into the following categories (in order of popularity) -1) Production company ringers. 2) Trolls. 3) Bandwagon jumpers. 4) Genuine reviews. I decided I couldn't not review this show because the score so obviously suggests number one applies here.Watching Not Safe for Work I was intrigued by the amount of comedy material such an environment had the potential to produce. Having been transferred out of London many years ago when I was in the civil service I know all about the culture shock.Instead NSFW gave us a sub-Inbetweeners pile of rubbish. Drug/alcohol induced farce? Check. Nerdy/awkward coworkers? Check. Hellish living arrangements? Check. The list of clichés goes on. It's like someone read TV Tropes and wanted to see how many they could get in one series.When the "comedy" took an Eastenders style depressing bent I switched off.Actors Sacha Dhawan and Zawe Ashton are better than this dross. I can only assume there was an outstanding bill or something for them to get involved in NSFW.It's homegrown, the acting's OK and the first episode showed promise that was firmly spat out on to the floor in the second. That's worth its four stars. If you're involved with the show then by all means watch it and learn from your mistakes. Everybody else should avoid.EDIT: NSFW appears to have been cancelled after haemorrhaging viewers at the same time I quit watching. I bet all 17 people who gave my review an "unhelpful" feel a bit silly now (although I imagine one would always feel a bit silly clicking the equivalent of a 'tantrum' button). Didn't change my mind about the show and evidently didn't particularly impress Channel 4 either.

Well as a civil servant of 23 years I can tell you this is just what it is like. The blind leading the sighted. The great idea of decentralising to odd locations and filling them with clueless dullards.Pilot Episode plot. A woman is being divorced by her husband. She thinks life cannot get any worse. Then she finds she is being moved out into the sticks (Apologies to people from Northampton). She get there and nothing works. He ex junior is now running things. He spends his time getting drunk and playing games. Can she work out what is going on and save the day? Well I am sure we shall find out in future episodes.This is a dystopian version of the future which brings to mind Philip K Dicks Flow my tears. As we are all now trapped in this nightmare future of normalcy where nothing is normal any more.I was laughing all the way through it. It is well worth a watch.