recommended

In truth, there is barely enough story here to make a film.

The acting is good, and the firecracker script has some excellent ideas.

The film's masterful storytelling did its job. The message was clear. No need to overdo.

It is not surprising that this biography of Ben Franklin received an Emmy Award as Outstanding Non-Fiction Special. After all, the show is a quality production throughout and has more than enough of the usual PBS polish and glitz to many anyone happy.This documentary consists of narration, paintings and historical recreations. And, much of the narration is based on the actual writings of the various folks. So, while you often see an actor very ably play Franklin, you also see actors as his sons, friends, foreign acquaintances and the like. It tends to make the story a lot more real--like the real life folks are talking directly to us--as if we are confidants.Content-wise, this is also an exceptional film. Being so long was important, as too often biographies of larger than life people are too short. This on allows a deeper exploration of the man and covers much of the same material in the masterful biography "The First American: The Life and Times of Benjamin Franklin"--which would make for great reading AFTER you see this film. Wonderful and expertly made in every way--this is simply terrific.By the way, the best part, to me, was in the second half when Franklin did a wonderfully witty dialog with 'Madame Gout'--as if his gout pains were alive and having a conversation with him. It's quite clever and made me laugh. I also appreciated the insight from the lady who explained why she thinks that Franklin never received as much acclaim as George Washington in this country--it made sense and made me think.

I cannot speak to the entire series, as I saw only "The Chessmaster". However, I saw enough to get a sense of what the creators were trying to do. In addition to the period images shown with 'Ken Burns effect' and commentaries by historians, there are soundbites from the historical figures (played, of course, by actors). Some of their texts these actors speak are clearly from diary entries or letters, and others are probably built from scholarship.It is, in my opinion, a very clever way of presenting history to people who are used to modern biopics with their interviews and all those 20th Century War shoes on the History Channel which can interview survivors. Engaging, well done, although undoubtedly too sedate for many.