Load of rubbish!!

The plot isn't so bad, but the pace of storytelling is too slow which makes people bored. Certain moments are so obvious and unnecessary for the main plot. I would've fast-forwarded those moments if it was an online streaming. The ending looks like implying a sequel, not sure if this movie will get one

There is, somehow, an interesting story here, as well as some good acting. There are also some good scenes

The thing I enjoyed most about the film is the fact that it doesn't shy away from being a super-sized-cliche;

We got Witchcraft X: Mistress of the Craft with a boxed package titled "Hotter Than Hell". It also contained Witchcraft XI: Sisters of the Blood. We have to insist that MOTC is far superior to SOTB, and this is why.1) MOTC makes no bones about the fact that it's an excruciatingly bad B-movie. SOTB, however, takes itself too seriously and, because of that, fails. Just as other posters have stated, MOTC is watchable because it's so funny. SOTB doesn't have that luxury.2) Another saving grace to MOTC is that the nude scenes are also far superior to those in SOTB. Lots of nice nipple play, and the actors in MOTC have no aversion in letting their hands wander. The actors in SOTB were unbelievably staid in their nude scenes. Yawn. We propose that the superiority of the MOTC cast could be because they're European. And the sex scene between Raven and the abominable Kerry Knowlton (as Hyde) was quite good.3) Eileen Daly as Raven was not as bad as everyone claims. It's a bad movie and she was cranking up the camp. Ain't no shame, and it was funny. It's what happens when older fans of The Cure decide to act in movies.4) The fight scenes (as others have mentioned) were exceptional in their poor quality. Our favorites— a. when Hyde slaps the junkies in the inexplicably abandoned beautiful British manor in the countryside; b. when the blonde vampire coyly climbs up a ladder and then abruptly extends her leg to kick Celeste in the face; c. an unnamed vampire tries to harm Celeste by gently nudging flipping her elbow against her breast; and d. when Celeste cuts "Jennifer Garner"'s head off.5) Quit harping on Sean Harry. Yes, he was bad, but he was in equal company.6) While "Scream Queen" Stephanie Beaton only got to shout once, it was well executed.7) Emily Bouffante also must worship The Cure. She was phenomenal with the ham.

Yeah i saw the rough cuts. The unedited sex scenes. The dire cut scenes. Almost on a par with the film 'The Need' for awful acting. This movie is as bad as bad films get.the bad script, bad acting, bad effects, bad locations, bad stunts bad everything. The best 'actors' in the film were the lap dancers they hired for the vampire extras!Sean Harry, the 'foppish actor' as someone else put it, makes a matchstick look talented here. His amazing ability to badly drive a car, when it is obviously being shook by people on the bonnet (check out the reflection in the windscreen), his inability to turn left, which is class. OH and don't forget the sex scene. plus his noteworthy use of a toy gun which the props guys couldn't even be bothered to disguise as a real gun. The other actors on screen could barely deliver their lines.It was as if half the time they were waiting for a line that wasn't there!The 'special effects' were soooo good to the point that the guys who did it took their real names off the credits!If you want a laugh at a party then rent this movie...then again there are plenty of good comedies that are just as funny and don't give money to people who don't deserve it.

Once again, the worst actress alive, messes up an even messier flick. How is that possible? Without Eileen Daly, this would just have been bad, but her "acting" plus "story" plus a production team and director with the talent of a vacuum cleaner, makes this about the worst movie ever made, next to Oasis of the Zombies. I normally like low budget, or even no budget, but this is just a waste of time.Oh, one plus: Some of the chicks have quite nice bodies. That's about it... AVOID!!!

I still can't believe how bad this movie was. If I wasn't a massochist I don't know if I would have survived the viewing. It looks like it cost about $1000 to make, but it wasn't the money that brought them down. The acting was horrid - not just bad, 3rd graders could have read the lines better. Second, the only other reason to watch this kind of movie is the skin, and that is sorely lacking in this flick. We don't even get to see the more attractive chicas in the buff. Ahh well, better luck next time eh?