The performances transcend the film's tropes, grounding it in characters that feel more complete than this subgenre often produces.

In truth, there is barely enough story here to make a film.

This movie feels like it was made purely to piss off people who want good shows

The storyline feels a little thin and moth-eaten in parts but this sequel is plenty of fun.

Danny (Holton) is a champion snowboarder who loves nothing more than being a radically awesome dude with an attitude. His idea of a perfect life would undoubtedly be jumping out of a helicopter on his snowboard and "slamming" a can of Mountain Dew. He takes his girlfriend Christine (Shinn) and his pals Greg (Berg) and Lesley (Hammons) to a remote cabin in snowy Colorado. They think they're going to get some nice rest and relaxation, but something goes awry...Tyler Bennett (Anderson) and his accomplice Marcus (Kaskel) are amoral bank robbers on the run. To escape from the heat of their latest job, they head out to the country and somehow find the aforementioned cabin. They hole up there and generally terrorize the four young adults. But they didn't count on one thing: a "bounty hunter outta Detroit" named Martin Towers. This grizzled, bearded man is relentless and has been tracking Tyler for years. Armed with a missile launcher and his own determination, will Towers finally get his man...? This one was pretty junky, even by AIP standards. It's a fairly basic hostage drama, married with some shreddin' snowboards. The main problem with White Fury is that its very simple idea overstays its welcome. Due to its pacing issues, when it seems the movie is going to end, it just keeps going with no new ideas to sustain it. Its threadbare plot is running on fumes. And having a wildly overlong snowmobile/snowboard chase/gunfight - which could have been a lot cooler had it been handled differently - doesn't really help matters. The same song playing over and over again in the background during the scene is kind of a red flag that it might be going on too long. Plus there are plenty of "gaffes" throughout the film that give away its no-budget status. So it's hard to shake the feeling that you're watching some bare-bones boring crud.On the bright side, there are some great late-80's fashions on display, and most of the cast does their absolute best under trying circumstances. Have you ever seen Ben Stiller's impression of Tom Cruise? That seems to be the acting style of Deke Anderson as the main baddie Tyler. Much of the rest of the cast seem to be non-actors, so no harsh criticism is coming their way, at least not here. Plus, there might be more subtext here than you might think. Due to some subtle clues, there might be a chance that this is actually a story of the forbidden love between Martin Towers and Danny. Truly one of the great star-crossed love stories of our time, I tell ya. If you ever watch the movie (or see it again if you already have), just take note of the dialogue and interactions between Martin and Danny. You'll see what we mean. Maybe it's not so far-fetched.While we wouldn't recommend it be the first AIP movie you ever see, if you can't get enough of that AIP style, you'll find some familiar entertainment in White Fury.For more insanity, please visit: comeuppancereviews.com

My time writing about the movies of David A. Prior is nearly done. With only one more planned review after this one, I thought it proper to write on the film that, after seeing a string of really poor Prior movies, made me want to see more because I liked it so much. Actually, I liked `White Fury' enough to see it a second time; quite a rare thing for me. It's not a film that the majority of people are going to enjoy. It's budget, like all of Prior's AIP films, is incredibly low. There are no A-list or even B-list actors in it. And the plot is nothing special. Yet I found it to be a special movie. I found myself strangely engrossed by what was unfolding onscreen, regardless of its flaws.The film is about two snowboarders that bring their girlfriends to a cabin in the mountains for a weekend of fun and relaxation. However, two murderous thieves that have been on a bank robbing spree are fleeing from authorities, and they stumble upon the cabin not long after the kids arrive. They hold them hostage until they can decide on a way of escaping. What they don't count on is Martin Towers, a Southern bounty hunter that has been trailing the crooks for awhile now. He figures out where they are and shows up to disrupt their plans. The kids also snatch the bank money and hide it. That's when we get a series of chases and shootouts both in the cabin and on the snowy mountain.I think that Prior did a splendid job here considering his budget. The villains are both realistic and scary, especially the lead villain. Prior used one of his regulars for the main kid: Sean Holton, who also often doubles as Prior's weapons and special effects man. Most surprising of all is Prior's choice for Towers. Douglas Harter is another Prior regular that often gets a small supporting role and provides food for the cast and crew (craft service). He is great as Martin Towers; his gruff look is just perfect for a grizzled old guy. He adds in elements to the film that aren't usually present, like the conversations he has with the police, the snowmobile dealer, and Holton. Even at the end there is a nice touch, with Towers in his van, watching Holton snowboard from a distance. Though there is no dialogue in that scene, the actors' still manage to give visual exchanges that work just right. Of course, Prior and John Cianetti (yet another regular) also get credit for a good script. Prior even gives us some good action scenes, like the fistfight in the cabin and a chase down the mountain with snowboards and snowmobiles. That isn't saying everything is done right, as some little nitpicks spoil a perfect score. This is frustrating because they are things that could have been avoided: Holton's snowboarding stunt double has to hide his face with a scarf and glasses, but when Holton appears, he isn't wearing these things; Holton never seen reloading the gun that he has fired multiple times; characters appearing at the bottom of a hill where they couldn't have gotten to in the amount of time given. The neat thing about writing little reviews for these small movies as compared to the big movies is that people that have worked on some of these movies have read my reviews and e-mailed me. Sometimes they don't like what I wrote, other times they are thankful anyone said anything good about them at all. I hope someday someone involved with this film stumbles across this review just so that they know someone enjoyed it twice. And I hope that Douglas Harter is one of them (I forgive you for `Maximum Breakout,' Doug). Upon seeing so many AIP films and seeing his name and face so many times, I have been the person that added most of his credits to this site. Thanks for the fun, Doug. Zantara's score: 8 out of 10.

I used to make fun of the preview of this movie that was on a copy of Split (another great AIP release). When I finally found a copy of this movie (many years later) I laughed at the price. Ninety-nine bright shiny pennies later I was the proud owner of this steaming pile. The cover of the VHS tape had a sticker on it that said "Four for 18 cents". That should give you an example of the quality.The movie was filmed in the 80s, so if the terrible script and acting doesn't do it, the clothing (shoestring bracelets, spandex dresses with tears in the side, white leather jackets, acid washed jeans, etc) definately will. I could keep going, but I can't. I can't bear to think about it any more.

Eldora, Colorado. There are two young couples, namely, Danny, the award-winning snowboarder and his lover Christine, and Greg, the award-loosing snowboarder and his new girlfriend Lesley. And the four go to the villa of Danny's uncle. And in the city of Boulder, Colorado, there is a group of bank robbers, namely, Tyler, Marcus and Marvin. They kill sixteen people in the bank and, after Tyler executes Marvin for the wrong information about the bank, go to the problematic villa in Eldora... First of all, it should be stressed this action film is laughably cheap and therefore neither building nor vehicle is cinematically destroyed. When the robbers wildly machine-gun in the bank, the building is, strangely enough, not damaged at all. And when the snowmobile is close to the explosion point, it transforms into a toy. And the screenplay is so unrealistic that every civilian character in this film knows how to use the bazooka, and every weapon has countless bullets. To make matters worse, the direction is too naive to make any kind of suspense, cinematography is TV-like, music is amateurish, dialogue is stereo-typed, and acting is simply bad. For good or bad, this film has two young actresses, namely, Christine Shinn and Chasity Hammons, who play almost opposite types of post-feministic girl. And partly because the two are not desirably beautiful, and partly because their acting is pretty bad, it can be said they have some familiarness rather than attractiveness. But that's all this film has, and even their familiarness is too weak to make the film recommendable.