A waste of 90 minutes of my life

This is one of the few movies I've ever seen where the whole audience broke into spontaneous, loud applause a third of the way in.

This is one of the best movies I’ve seen in a very long time. You have to go and see this on the big screen.

It is neither dumb nor smart enough to be fun, and spends way too much time with its boring human characters.

Terrorists making devastating weapons of mass destruction, but don't want to kill people even after setting the devices, so why do it, was your journey necessary.Cleric who deliberately sabotages his own terrorist's plots, what's the point of plotting.Strong female characters, unable to do any wrong, worrying about security failures, which of course cannot be their fault.That just leaves a CIA splinter group to be the brutal baddies and take all the hits.Point about political propaganda is that is supposed to be subtle and if Hollywood is getting this desperate, they must think they are failing to get their PC message across, as if shouting even louder will work.Otherwise, the movie is well made and nicely shot, with some gritty London scenes, but why ruin it by mindless preaching.

Entertaining several twists. Female lead is a bit of prodigy like the main character in "Covert Action". Some differences, i.e. is already in field, no mention of personal history on the main character, except that she is depressed by inability to stop a bombing in time, and how she came to be sourced by CIA. Character development could be better. More flashbacks, fleshing out would have been good for identifying with characters. Follow up (what outcome) on some of the supporting cast would be nice as well. I'd like to see this arrangement again though in sequel - think it could do well.

This is an OK well paced spy thriller. It is somewhat predictable and weak in places but has what should be at least a B+ cast. Some are excellent, and Naomi Rapace continues to impress. It could have been better but I did enjoy it. However why on earth was Orlando Bloom chosen to have a "Cockney accent" as in the title it is embarrassing. There was almost no need for it, or maybe even get an English actor.

This movie was riveting. The plot twists and double crossings were, to my mind, totally unexpected. The casting was superb, and the actors did a damn good job. Noomi Rapace, Orlando Bloom, John Malkovich, Michael Douglas - all excellent. The writing (Peter O'Brien) and direction (Michael Apted) was excellent. This brings me to my main point; are movie critics and/or audiences becoming stupider? How can this EXCELLENT movie receive a Rotten Tomatoes critics rating of 25% and an audience rating of 40%? Maybe the critical reviewers have conscious/ unconscious biases themselves; perhaps related to their own activities? Poor critical reviews by media influencers directly affects the profit margin of a movie. If we can no longer trust media influencers to provide honest assessments of movies (partially because of their own treasonous deeds), then it follows that we need Goy-only media, and Goy-only systematic rating platforms.