I love this movie so much

Terrible acting, screenplay and direction.

I wanted to but couldn't!

It's entirely possible that sending the audience out feeling lousy was intentional

Does some of these critics actively just want to see their reviews as decent reviews, it wasn't typical run of the mill adventure, , didn't anyone just enjoy the ENTERTAINMENT ffs, instead of picking up every tiny flaw they could nibble at all day and night long

I am gobsmacked at the idea that this film actually made its way to any screen, let alone mine. From as early as the title, I knew not to expect much. I was wrong. This film delivered. And what it delivered is a stunning example of film-making so fantastically bad that, ninety minutes earlier, I wouldn't have thought it possible.within the unmitigated failure of this project, it would seem that they threw lines of dialog on a page and then counted on the CGI to carry the rest. Unfortunately, the CGI in this film is close, but not as good as when I learned to use the numbers on my pocket calculator to spell out "BOOBS".Filmed half in a dank basement, the rest was filmed on the Queen Mary, using tilting cameras to pronounce the ever increasing, yet entirely inconsistent list of this most fictional of ships (it's a shame the extras weren't told which way to lean). The CGI effects enveloped what remained, and to the credit of the makers, it was too dark to really see anything at all. For that, I'm eternally grateful.There are precious moments to be cherished. One which comes to mind was when the protagonist and her young Richard Branson-ish love interest are stymied by an errant extension cord poised over a dollop of sea-water. Or better, when a helicopter carrying the well-meaning scientist is confronted by an impossibly tall wave and must climb in order to avoid being swallowed whole. The pilot is seen to cry out, "Pull up!! I repeat - pull up!!", and then sure enough, he pulls back on the stick, leaving us to wonder, "who the hell was he taking to?" There is a place for films like these. No, no, I don't mean in theaters - God no. Films like these are an inspiration to the rest of us, giving a very clear assurance that indeed we really could do a better job, even with sock-puppets and a cardboard box. Otherwise, films like these are a simple and special form of entertainment for those times when the bottle is nearly empty and you can't see much anyway.

**** May contain strong spoilers ****This is a review made by StoneDraim... and that means that if you want to read a probably different kind of review, keep reading....This is my personal experience, my personal point of view/perspective and my personal opinion... and my opinion is just one of like 7 billions in this world.First off, I thought the whole concept and the movie itself of Titanic 2 was a joke. Like a "trailer joke". Then I heard that there really is a movie called Titanic 2. After that.... I heard some things about this movie and looked it up on IMDb... and....well.... 1.8 says a lot. Anyway; to get more understanding and appreciation of really good productions and a total quality of a motion picture, I went on and watched it.The ONLY thing that is of near approved quality in this one is Bruce Davison. How he accepted this production is a enormous enigma. Sad.Take the adult industry and how the production use to be. This is in many cases even worse. If you are a serious movie viewer, see this one as education. Otherwise; you have been warned.Over to the movie as a product: - The production : Awful balance of picture and music. Music itself low budget overall, and... well....bad. The animations and special effects; the concepts of animations and special effects should be ashamed to allow this kind of amateur work. Movie recording quality is similar from an 1980 poor example of an adult production. - The actors : Actors...? Where....? (Bruce Davison is maybe the exception.) Bad boy, Shane Van Dyke, bad boy! - The story : Did anyone give it a real reflection on how reprehensible the small adjustment from the storyline of "Titanic" this is...? Well...?! ....exactly....so I thought. - Entertainment : Entertainment. Yes. I want that too. - Age : 112,0 out of 10. (The final rate is based most on my own entertainment of the movie. Short elucidation of the rating: 4 Failed. Lacking in character. 3 Bad. Weak. Foul. 2 Amateur, small-time, bad... and misconduct. 1 Poor. Lousy. There should be proper laws against this. Press delete. 0 Ignoble... and jail time should be served.)

I'm torn. If this was meant to be a spoof or a sublime comedy, than my rating would be an 8 or 9. As a serious movie - this has got to be one of the worst constructed movies in history. Acting, script, plot, dialogue, sets, effects, soundtrack - you name it - is just abhorrent. Utter ridiculousness. There is no possible way someone signed off on this and thought it would work as a drama. It has to be a joke. It just has to. No sane industry executive would dare put there name on this otherwise. If it indeed was meant as a comedy - then - hats off. It's hilarious. And you have my apologies. Watch it as a comedy and have a good laugh, watch it as a drama and you'll be hard pressed to make it to the end credits.