Some things I liked some I did not.

just watch it!

Amazing worth wacthing. So good. Biased but well made with many good points.

All of these films share one commonality, that being a kind of emotional center that humanizes a cast of monsters.

This is basically a piece about the filmmaker, his passion for Kansas basketball, his tons of money, and his ego. He sort of claims ownership of basketball and the document for himself and Kansas. This isn't really a film like so many other of the 30 for 30s (focusing on the connection between sports and humanity), but a way for a rich Kansas fan to stroke his ego. Complete waste of time.

I know that my review will probably offend some folks, but my summary is exactly how I feel about this episode of "30 for 30". Now I LOVE this series---and have enjoyed dozens of the shows. BUT, I can't think of a single film in the series that elicited such a strong reaction in me.Recently the original rules of basketball that were created by Dr. Naismith were coming up for auction at Sotheby's. Not surprisingly, they were expected to fetch a huge price. Now here is where it gets weird. A totally fanatical University of Kansas fan has helped the filmmaker of "There's No Place Like Home". His cause? To do everything he can to guarantee that the University of Kansas becomes the possessor of these rules. There's SOME logic behind this. Dr. Naismith was the first coach of the university's basketball program and he worked at KU for a long time. BUT, here's the problem for me....who cares?! You see this nut traveling all across America and using a TON of his energy begging for donations. Couldn't he have spent his time more wisely--such as tutoring some illiterate inner-city kid or cutting a disabled person's lawn?! And, couldn't the donors have used their money to make a difference--like curing some deadly disease?! To me, sports are okay....but there needs to be SOME perspective. This guy seems to say that the worst thing in the world would be for these rules to go to Duke. What about chemical weapons or famine?! This film, probably unintentionally, makes one of the best arguments for why we really DON'T need professional or college sports! The show was well-made but who cares? Focusing so much on this one man seemed to make the show about him and not much more. A rare misstep for this great show.

There are loads of great stories in sports; great comebacks, shock upsets, conflict, unity, obsession and intrigue – the schedules mean that we move on to the next one so quickly and it is good to have a series like this where there is room for reflection and documenting of these tales. Mostly that has been my experience with this series – that the subjects engage me. So, with so many great stories and this series trying to tell them, why does it spend an hour on story about a filmmaker making a film about himself trying to convince a very rich man to spend a chunk of his considerable wealth on a piece of paper so it can exist in his team's premises rather than another team's premises?I'm simplifying the plot here but I'm not the only one – because the film does this too. The story opens with some detail behind the team and the man in question and it is during the introduction and titles that questions are asked about the nature of this loyalty etc and I assumed that the film would be taking this approach – using the central concept as a way of exploring bigger issues. In a way I was partly right because to a point the basketball rules are a MacGuffin to allow for the real story to occur; the story of Josh. This was his idea, his passion and he needs money to do it for himself so that he can make his dream into reality and boy does he let us know it. I honestly doubt that any other word was said in this film as often as the words "I", "Me", "Mine" and a few other similar words because this film is from Josh and about Josh – and sadly not even in a meaningful way. He doesn't use himself as a microcosm of a bigger story or as an illustration of something else, he simply tries to make this idea happen by asking a couple of rich people for money in very stiff interviews.The film gives some information about the creator of basketball and Josh's team but it is very brief and focused on facts that will be known already if you know the subject well. This leaves us following Josh around for his couple of house calls, watching staged reaction shots (and if they are not staged then they are certainly very stiff). There is some drama in the actual auction at the end, but otherwise the film is very simple and really comes down to one guy telling Josh that he will pay for it as long as it doesn't go above a certain amount; nothing complex or odd – just a guy with money to spare, sparing it on a piece of sporting history. It isn't particularly good as a subject and it isn't helped by how often we have monologues and interviews with Josh (where the word "I" is the majority of what he says, since he is only ever talking about himself). Like I said, this wouldn't have mattered if he had used himself to do something of note but after 30 minutes it does start feeling like an ego trip for him – a feeling that only increases as Josh acts up in the background of someone else spending money or the scene where Josh presents the rules (which someone else bought with their money) to the University.Ultimately this film is about a rich guy spending an obscene amount of money to buy some sporting memorabilia – that's the story here but it is framed as being fan-driven to make it more palatable. Shame then that the addition to Josh to this story of a rich man spending his money, doesn't actually make the film better – it simply makes it feel weird that he is so focused on even though all he had was an idea and a few begging meetings; and then you realize that he made this film about himself – then it just feels weirder again. It should have had a wider point and should have told more stories of interest, but instead we spend loads of time with Josh chasing money.There are loads of great sporting stories in the world. I have no idea why this one got told as part of such a high-profile series.

30 for 30: There's No Place Like Home (2012) **** (out of 4) Incredibly fun documentary about the auction of James Naismith's original, two-page notes with the rules of basketball. A die-hard Kansas Jayhawks fan finds out that these legendary papers are going to be auctioned off so he heads out to try and find someone to come up with the millions to win them and return them to Kansas. Josh Swade is that fans name and I must admit that I thought he was downright crazy but in an incredibly good way. Coming from Kentucky in understand people like Josh because there are many fans here who would do whatever they could for their school. I think if you're not a fan of sports then you'll probably be confused by everything in this film but those who understand the passion should love it. The entire film was just one incredibly tense journey as Josh tries to get someone to cough up millions of dollars to get this document. We see him interview boosters, former Kansas coaches like Roy Williams and Larry Brown and then things take a sharp turn as more supporting players come in. The auction sequence is without question one of the most tense moments you're going to see from any documentary and the entire film is a just a tremendous ride. The Kansas Hall of Fame should certainly put this movie on display and I'm sure that the Duke hatred will grow even deeper. Any sport fan certainly owes it to themselves to check this film out as it's one of the best out there.