Why so much hype?

People are voting emotionally.

The joyful confection is coated in a sparkly gloss, bright enough to gleam from the darkest, most cynical corners.

The movie's not perfect, but it sticks the landing of its message. It was engaging - thrilling at times - and I personally thought it was a great time.

A bit of an odd duck of a Newspaper noir. Cy Endfield's film begins promisingly with big city muck, but then detours into the New England countryside. It's more than a bit jarring in tone, as the small town 'quaintness' takes over much of the middle section of the film. Dan Duryea is a noir icon, but, he comes on a bit too strong as the scheming newspaper man (Gale Storm's character should have called the cops and put a restraining order on him).Things pick up when a black maid is falsely accused of murder (not a spoiler). All of a sudden, the movie returns to its crime roots, and it becomes more than a subtle McCarthy red baiting tale (indeed, several of the filmmakers were soon ensnared, including DaSilva and Endfield). Herbert Marshall is fine as is the full supporting cast, but Howard DaSilva steals the show as a jovial mobster - the more he smiles, the more menacing he becomes.UNDERWORLD STORY is a mixed bag, but still effective enough in the end, even if the climactic scene is bit too brief. One of the other oddities is that the accused (Mary Anderson) is not only an obviously white actress, but, given precious little screen time. It's been written that the Red Scare aspect gave UNDERWORLD STORY a taint that kept it from being more seen over the years (Warner Classics has re-issued it, and TCM runs the pretty good-looking transfer; a bit noisy on the sound end, though). Would make a good double bill with the similar superior Robert Wise film CAPTIVE CITY (1952) with John Forsythe as a small town newspaper man batting the mob.

One might choose to ponder the social messages that this film supposedly contains---witch hunts, HUAC investigations, etc---but I'd recommend that you just sit back and enjoy a terrific, well-plotted and fast-moving film.Not to ignore any social issues that the film might have intended to address, but you're really spinning yer' wheels over very little if you spend too much time looking for them. True, the innocent black maid is framed for murder (and, indeed, Gar Moore's despicable character even utters the "N" word), but it strikes me as just another compelling element in this very intense drama (and if they wanted to make a big social point, why didn't they hire an actual black actress for the part, I wonder?)Dan Duryea was born to play the role of Mike Reese; he totally dominates the film, and brilliantly. Gale Storm is pretty and has a nice, simple charm about her, but she's totally out of her league alongside Duryea, Herbert Marshall, Howard da Sylva, and Michael O'Shea.Speaking of da Sylva's role, several other reviewers have cited his "scenery chewing"; I disagree, and strongly. DaSylva, a first-rate actor, is a model of control: suave, witty, affable...a facade which barely manages to conceal a razor-sharp hostility just beneath the surface. It's a masterful, if fairly brief, performance. Also, it's fascinating to watch "Underworld Story" and discover why the classic "Night of the Hunter" (1955) looks the way it does. Stanley Cortez's bleak, stylized cinematography adds immensely to the atmosphere of "Underworld", especially the near-expressionistic look of the streets and buildings of the town where most of the action takes place."Underworld Story" should be regarded as a stand-out example of classic, late 40-s noir.

Dan Duryea is one of the best actors out there, able to play the slimiest slime-ball and the staunchest of heroes. Here he does a little of both and you're never sure which side he's on. The movie starts as a Noir Crime Thriller, then becomes a 30's-style social drama, then switches back to noir and crime -- but it never loses its style, its verve and its pace. Constantly fun and involving, due to Duryea's movable morals -- and to Stanley Cortez's gorgeous black-and-white cinematography. Director/Writer Endfield does a fine job keeping things going, setting up interesting shots and corralling a cast that's great down to every tiny part. Bad Guy Howard Da Silva chews the scenery with relaxed gusto and is a joy to watch. Highly recommended.

What makes this little crime movie as effective as it is, has something to do with the casting of unconventional Dan Duryea in the lead as the unscrupulous reporter. He's a lot like Willem Dafoe with the way he talks out of the bottom of his mouth - like a ventriloquist's dummy - and I mean that in a good way. Had they cast a more conventional leading man in the part like a Jimmy Stewart, for example, I don't think it would've worked as well, because Duryea really does come across as quite a heel, a low-life. It just isn't clear to the viewer if he should root for him or not, so that when he does undergo a change in character, it comes as a surprise rather than a foregone conclusion.The movie also provides Howard Da Silva with one of his last roles before he was to be blacklisted for over 10 years. Always good at playing thugs, he's quite colorful and does a lot of scenery chewing as a powerful crime figure.The script is intelligent and gritty, and the photography is appropriately stark and oppressive.