disgusting, overrated, pointless

I think this is a new genre that they're all sort of working their way through it and haven't got all the kinks worked out yet but it's a genre that works for me.

Close shines in drama with strong language, adult themes.

A clunky actioner with a handful of cool moments.

This film got positive reviews when it was screened around the Christmas period last year, however I sat on it for ages since I was conscious that being a good drama around that time of year doesn't always translate into it being a good drama in and of itself. The ghostly tale of death and mystery is told by an older woman approaching her own death to a younger woman commissioned to write her story – it is a standard setup and from here the story is told across many years in a patient and reasonably engaging manner. Indeed, the telling of the tale is where the film's strengths lie because it is undeniably a well crafted affair. The casting, the locations, the production values and the general maturity of the whole film are all such that it feels much better than it actually is. Suffice to say I can understand why it went down quite well at the end of the festive period, because it does stand out as a classy and adult affair, in contrast to the lighter entertainment fare that would have dominated the previous week or so.I did find it pretty good thanks to this, with a steady approach and decent tone, but yet I never really got drawn into it in the way I would have liked for a serious drama and well-told story. There are a few moments of suspense and chills here, but generally it doesn't build into anything bigger or more dramatic – the same steady approach that helps to found it, also undoes it in this regard. It has its merits and there is a certain satisfaction to it but it never really gets beyond the quality of its build to become something where you don't see the craftsmanship because of how strong the actual story is.The cast is part of that quality build and I did enjoy both Colman and Redgrave; the rest of the cast also has good quality turns – although Game of Thrones fans may find some of the casting a bit distracting! Direction and design of the film is of a high quality as I say – it looks good and feels weighty throughout. Shame that the delivery of the material didn't build better and didn't provide more in the way of chills and emotions. Perhaps it was too much going on in the small space available (with a couple of stories here) but it does feel lacking as a whole, even if the quality of the build is enjoyable to see.

the presence of Vanessa Redgrave could be a guarantee about this film. but it is more. because it is not only a beautiful film but a wise one. not victim of many easy solutions - useful for many Gothic stories - but delicate and precise, gentle and care to each obstacle. a movie who remembers many old stories. but it has courage to not be only one of them. the key is the intelligent performance of lead actresses. and the spirit of old world - tower of secrets, deaths and the best servants. but the secret remains the clash between feelings, past and future, the limits and shadows of characters as a puzzle. that seems be all. a movie who has not ambition to be remarkable. but it is really good.

The film was pushed as a spooky, supernatural story when it is more of a thriller.Vanessa Redgrave is the dying writer. Olivia Coleman is the biographer called in to write a story of her youth in a large house with a dysfunctional family. A mother who went mad. A father on the verge of madness. Plus uncontrollable sisters who are a burden to the housekeepers.The film takes a while to get going but the book has been adapted for the screen by Oscar winner Christopher Hampton. As the film develops, secrets are revealed about the twin sisters and their effect of the people around them.The film is well acted and the story gradually draws you in and surprises you as it does not go the way you think it will. Of course I have never read the book so no comparison is made with the novel. It's a drama that stands in its own merits.

A film version of this wonderful book would be difficult to do properly. I found it adequate, but certainly not impressive. The dialog while touching on aspects of key elements from the book fell short of conveying to the viewer important points of the story. I'm not sure I would have enjoyed this film had I not read and enjoyed the book. Many compromises are necessary to transform a novel, but both the screenplay and direction were lacking.At the outset, it is offered as a ghost story and this emphasis is unnecessary. It is a mystery to unravel without ethereal suggestion. The relevance of the book lacking it's final story is brushed aside where it could have easily been developed. The strangeness of Charlie and his sister was introduced belatedly and incompletely. Margaret's wardrobe was not suitable - did she stop by on her way to the gymnasium? An actress who cared about her role might have provided better input on attire. The romantic element between Margaret and the Doctor was implied by weak smiles between them and a parting comment although not particularly important to the plot.Much of this might have been saved with an introductory voice over or even flashback dialog with Margaret's father at the bookshop to set these facts in place. For example: "The reclusive and mysterious Vida Winter's most famous work is one nobody has ever read in a book of thirteen tales containing only twelve." Likewise, a summary, perhaps as dialog between Margaret and the Doctor where she relates the missing tale as Vida's Cinderellian story of the orphan half-sister would have brought more conclusion to the viewers.