The Worst Film Ever

Good films always raise compelling questions, whether the format is fiction or documentary fact.

Very good movie overall, highly recommended. Most of the negative reviews don't have any merit and are all pollitically based. Give this movie a chance at least, and it might give you a different perspective.

The film's masterful storytelling did its job. The message was clear. No need to overdo.

The defeated South tries to win back their dignity after the Civil War when smug Yankees begin a nasty little change called the re-construction. Brothers against brother during the war left many dead on both sides, and the resentments are strong. For elderly ranch widow May Robson, all she has is the massive cattle herds that the North tries to tax her on. Robson's granddaughter (Joan Bennett) is a belle on a mission: get arms to the surviving Southern soldiers so they can keep their own. Pretty crafty even against the more powerful North (obviously intent on humiliating their former enemy), the South hold on and even win sympathy as they deal with some pretty vindictive men.This is quite different than usual westerns in the fact that it presents a part of history almost entirely overlooked in film. The beautiful Bennett may seem more Brooklyneese than Texan but is still a force to be reckoned with as she fights feelings for two men-the rugged Randolph Scott and the more gentlemanly Robert Cummings who goes off on a secret mission against the re-construction. Robson delivers an entirely convincing portrait of an aging matron refusing to lie down and die after loosing almost everything. Supporting players include the likes of Walter Brennan, Raymond Hatton and Robert Barrat who add authenticity to the proceedings. The lesser known character actress Esther Howard has a memorable cameo as an obvious madam. A few homey ditties are tossed in (including a song with lyrics by Frank Loesser).The only problem is that the film tries too hard to cover too many issues in 90 minutes, including a brief mention of the Klu Klux Klan and their arrival in the declining town of Abilene. Had the story stuck to one or two themes and not (even briefly) mentioned important issues not explored, it would have been an even better film.

"The south was ruled as a conquered enemy. Northern politicians wallowed in an orgy of power--of plunder by organized mobs--of tribute and tyranny and death." This is taken from the prologue to this film. From the early 20th century until about 1960, there was a revisionist view of the Reconstruction years in which the Southerners were all portrayed as victims of evil Yankees and 'uppity' blacks! It turns out that this really is NOT what this era was like but it sure dominated films from "Birth of a Nation" (1915) through "Gallant Legion" (1948)--see David Blight and Eric Foner as well as the Nebraska Partnership for American History Education for more information about this). "The Texans" carries on this tradition of carpetbaggers (Northerners whose sole aims are to get rich and mistreat the Southerners) and scallywags (Southernerswho would betray their neighbors by working with the evil carpetbaggers).The film begins with the Yankee soldiers doing all kinds of injustices to Southerners. Randolph Scott, Walter Brennan and the other good guys are all ex-Confederate soldiers who can only look on in horror as the occupying Northern soldiers do their worst. However, Joan Bennett (sporting blonde hair as she did early in her career) and May Robson have an idea--to sell guns to their Southern friends, hide cattle from greedy Northern tax collectors and sow discord against evil Yankee oppression. While completely wrong, at least this film doesn't credit the wonderful KKK with being heroes of the post-war South (like in "Birth of a Nation"!)! During this portion of the film, oddly, Randolph Scott seems to be strangely absent from the plot. He's there but doesn't do a whole lot. Later, however, he's a little more obvious in the film and convinces a group of angry ex-Confederates to relocate to Abilene--and to get away from the repressive Yanks. After a long and arduous journey through Indian attacks and a pursuit by carpetbaggers intent on jailing the lot on trumped up charges, they arrive in Abilene at the exact perfect time. And, everyone lives happily ever after.As far as this film goes, with so many westerns like it, it didn't do a whole lot to stand out from the crowd. Heck, even Randolph Scott made at least one other film with the same plot idea ("Thunder Over the Plains"). In addition, Errol Flynn and several other actors have made similar films--it was an awfully familiar theme. While I am a huge fan of Randolph Scott westerns, this one is amazingly ordinary despite some nice scenes and acting here and there and is far from being a must-see film. If you do watch it, just don't think it's in any way a history lesson!

Some of today's viewers might be a bit put off by what they see as racism in the beginning. Just remember not to judge other times by the current time in which you dwell. Black Union soldiers did make themselves unwelcome in post Civil War South. Carpetbaggers did go to the South to take advantage. The South WAS desperately poor after the war and unfair taxes were levied. These are historical facts which do not take sides. The writer took the facts and the attitudes, of both sides, and wove them into this story. Randolph Scott as a former Confederate who wanted the country reunited instead of taken over by Mexico. He said that all Yankees were not like the ones pushing their way around Texas, as he had met them in the war. The Union officer felt the same about many former Confederates. The movie showed this as the beginning of understanding between former foes. The acting was good. Perhaps one of Scott's better performances. Mae Robson was great and reminded me of Beula Bondi. Robert Cummings (well before his TV successes) was the former Confederate officer who could not accept the loss of the war. Joan Bennett was beautiful as the center of the love triangle between Scott, Cummings and herself. Character actors brought the film along quite well as they often do - Walter Brennan, Raymond Hatton, Frances Ford, Robert Barrat, Harvey Stephens. And there was Richard Denning with a small speaking part before his Mr. North fame. There was a most believable fight scene in the streets between Union troops and former confederates. It was well directed. There was an action scene of wagons, horses and cattle running from brush fire set by Indians that was very well done considering this was before digital special effects. The movie moved along nicely from the very beginning with plenty of Western excitement. Be sure to catch this Western if you get the chance. Although it has some twists and turns, it is still a good old fashioned Western.

"The Texans" is a post civil war picture that is set in Texas. The story centers around carpetbaggers trying to cheat Texas ranchers out of their land which eventually forces them to undertake a cattle drive to Abeline. The movie has the look and feel of a classic western but there's something missing. It has plenty of action to be sure, but the action sequences have the look of stock footage which Paramount was fond of using during the 30's. The Zane Grey series, most of which starred Randolph Scott is a case in point. The chief villain (Robert Barrat) is presented alternately as a heartless villain and buffoon, a major weakness in the story line. There are also too many obvious "studio exterior" shots for my liking.In a major case of miscasting, Joan Bennett plays the heroine who we are to believe is a gun runner and large ranch owner. Why during her escape from town even gets a smudge of dirt on her pretty face, but not a hair is out of place. Somebody like Jean Arthur would have been more convincing. Randolph Scott is good as the hero, and May Robson as "Granna" virtually steals the picture. Robert Cummings as Scott's rival for the affections of Ms. Bennett, Walter Brennan as Bennett's crusty foreman and Raymond Hatton as Scott's sidekick are also along for the ride. Francis Ford (brother of John) stands out in a featured role as "Uncle Dud". If you look real close, you might spot Clayton Moore and Richard Denning in bit parts.But as I suggested earlier, the picture suffers from the lack of a strong villain. A good western, but could have been much better.