I don't have all the words right now but this film is a work of art.

In truth, there is barely enough story here to make a film.

I enjoyed watching this film and would recommend other to give it a try , (as I am) but this movie, although enjoyable to watch due to the better than average acting fails to add anything new to its storyline that is all too familiar to these types of movies.

The story, direction, characters, and writing/dialogue is akin to taking a tranquilizer shot to the neck, but everything else was so well done.

I really liked the two stories of this series, if only because the past one is an almost forgotten piece of history in terms of films and TV series whereas the present story is told in a quite unbiased line; at least, as much unbiased as any story dealing with such conflict can be.While I write this review, Israel is striking Gaza with their planes, ships and artillery while Gaza is striking Israel with their rockets. It is very difficult to adopt an objective point of view of the conflict; once you get into it, you always have a tendency to lean towards one side or the other. "The Promise" criticises present-day Israeli policies in the occupied territories as well as the old days terrorist actions of the Irgun (a Jewish terrorist group), but it also creates good Israeli characters and others full of inner contradictions and moral conflicts. The Palestinian side goes cleverly untouched, with only a couple of characters with some meaning in the story. So, as a whole, I don't think it's biased at all. It just tells some uncomfortable truths.There are several striking similarities between the times of the Mandate and present-day Palestine. To begin with, Israelis achieved independence thanks to terrorism, something that Palestinians are now somehow imitating. You can choose to call them "freedom fighters" or "terrorists", but you'll have to choose the same term for both, and this is an uncomfortable truth. Other examples which have a very clear resemblance with present days Palestine resistance: Irgun kidnapping soldiers or hiding weapons in schools. All that part of the story has been forgotten for such a long time that, once rediscovered, one needs to review and update his former ideas about the conflict.Now, about the differences. The British Mandate is portrayed as a peace-keeper force supported by international law, whereas Israel in the occupied territories are portrayed as a brutal force acting against all international laws. However uncomfortable they might be, these differences are essentially true, uncomfortable truths once again. The Nakba ethnic cleansing (recently admitted and explored by Israeli historians), the suicide bombers, the deep division among the Palestinian ranks, the wall dividing Palestinian populations, the illegal settlements in the occupied territories, the underlying racism of Israeli society... all of them uncomfortable truths. Even the British abandoning the land even knowing of the massacres that were about to happen (it reminded me of the Dutch in Srebrenica). No one is left untouched in "The Promise".By the way, to conclude, what I liked the most was the extremely beautiful parallelism between the broken promise of the protagonist (Len) to protect the Arab child and the broken promise of the British troops to protect the Arab population. I somehow think that Len's tears at the end of the film were even more related to that second broken promise than to the first. A beautiful moment, I must admit.

This is the most biased and hate filled series that has ever disgraced televisions and computers.The series' thin attempt at remaining impartial in a complicated conflict only demonizes Israelis. I believe it to be the worst example of anti-Israel propaganda that's ever seen on television.Every Palestinian is portrayed as a victim, ever Israeli as their callous oppressors. I understand that this is a mini-series not a documentary, but depicting a situation the way the director and production staff has done only adds fuel to an already warm fire. If you have had the misfortune of watching this film, please research your facts properly.

I had reservations about THE PROMISE. After all, this is a four-part, eight-hour long miniseries, taking part in two time periods about the Israel-Palestine conflict. This tricky issue tends to be reduced to propaganda by partisans from both sides. Unfortunately Peter Kosminsky is such a partisan and he delivers a rant in the form of melodrama, not helped by tired direction, a thin script and poor history.The story is partly set in 2005 and partly in the period 1945-8. In 2005 a young British student named Erin finds her grandfather's diary. Through the diary we follow Len, her grandfather, as he serves with the British Army in Palestine from 1945 to 1948. This becomes significant as Erin travels to Israel with a friend and finds herself trying to fulfil a promise her grandfather made all those years ago.Kosminsky's pitch is essentially ethnic Jewish self-criticism in which he castigates the Israelis for the bloody way in which they founded and have maintained their state. Unfortunately this means that he isn't really very interested in either the Palestinians or the British. The Palestinians appear only as victims and exercise no agency of their own. Erin/Len largely act as eyes for the viewer. By far the most interesting parts concern the Israeli family of Erin's friend and their internal dynamics (grandfather is an ex-Irgun, the parents are good liberal Israelis, the son is a former soldier working for peace, the daughter has just been conscripted for the IDF). Erin (apparently based on Kosminsky's daughters - God help them) is an ignorant slag who manages to sleep with most of the cast for no discernible reason, who is often bafflingly obtuse (demanding driving lessons from a Palestinian when her epilepsy means she isn't allowed to drive) and spends most of her time in a sullen pout. She's also a bit of an idiot - when the Israeli's try to bulldoze a Palestinian house she chains herself and a young child to a pillar inside. Endangering kids much? The whole thing is then rendered instantly facile when her Israeli chum promptly gets out a pair of wire- cutters and breaks the chain before taking her outside. Much of her time is spent prompting people to provide long, boring exposition in case the audience are idiots. Incidentally her epilepsy almost never features in the story and serves no purpose.Len meanwhile is a such a mass of contradictions as to not exist as a proper character. Supposedly a veteran of Arnhem, a tough Para and a working class lad from Leeds, he is played with a doe eyed passivity, broken only by moments of shrill anger and unconvincing heroics (all the combat scenes are silly and exist only to liven up the trailers). His loyalties are supposed to be tested but really he just rolls with the flow, transferring his loyalties to whichever side (Arab or Jew) has received the most victim points that episode. Rather than bother to build a character Kosminsky just manufactures scenes every so often where Brits are beastly to Arabs/Jews so that Len can swan in and save them so that we know he's a hero. Probably his finest moment is when finds his Jewish girlfriend tarred and feathered and promptly decides that what a traumatised woman needs is...yet another painfully ugly sex scene.The script makes very little pretence to be even handed, picking (rightly)on every Israeli fault whilst ignoring Arab ones. Both Len and Erin go on a learning journey from pro-Israeli/Jewish to anti- Israeli/Jewish (as opposed to pro-Palestinian/Arab). In Erin's timeline this works OK as she meets the Jewish religious settlers (not very nice people), sees the humiliating checkpoint system, the chronic discrimination against Palestinians and discovers the results of the ethnic cleansing from 1948. However this method works very badly for Len's story. So you get the arrival of the Holocaust survivors, the King David Hotel bombing, the Affair of the Sergeants and the ethnic cleansing of Arab villages in 1948. But there is little else but these big events and as a result the whole narrative is very jumpy, with no sense of the passage of time.A lot of the problems are down to the ham-handedness of the direction and deeply mediocre work by the DP. There is no feel for the period 1945-8 and the impression is often of children playing dress-up. Many scenes are risibly bad with pride of place going to a terrible exploding CGI door that flies straight at the viewer like one of those gimmick shots from a 3D movie. There is also precious little tension, mood- building, immediacy or physicality. Moments that ought to be shocking or scary or blood-pumping are instead flat. There is also a tendency to manufacture fake drama, as when Len leaves his unit (who are under attack) to rescue the son of his Arab friend, escorts him several miles and then abandons him 100 feet from safety whereupon the kid is promptly shot by a sniper. It makes no sense and is utterly contrived. Incidentally, Len then returns to his unit, with several hours having passed, to discover that...literally nothing has changed.There are numerous historical oddities. For instance, Len is a Sergeant but appears to have no officer and is casually let into high-ranking meetings. For instance, the impression is given that Israel started the 1948 war and that it was a purely Israeli-Palestinian fight. For instance, Kosminsky's belief that the use of collective punishment by the Brits against Jews and by Israelis against Palestinians is unique (it's as old as time).I don't have a side in the Israel-Palestine dispute and frankly don't care. My interest was largely in the British.This is poor history, poor writing and poor drama.

I have a thing about miniseries as much more can be put into 6-8hrs that can be packed into the 2hrs of a feature length story. IMO almost all of televisions greatest works are in mini-series such as 'Boys from the Black Stuff', Traffic' & 'Edge of Darkness'. Alan Bleasdale has always been the master of this format but, with 'The Promise', Peter Kosminsky joins him at the top. All 8hrs is used to maximum effect.'The Promise' shows how Israel was born in violence & how the violence is maintained in the present day. Around this Kosminsky has drawn a gripping storyline of the granddaughter of a soldier in the British Protectorate searching out the mystery of her grandfathers story. Thus Erin, the granddaughter travels modern Israel while her grandfathers story shows late '40s Palestine & the birth of Israel.Kosminsky has been accused of taking an anti-Jewish stance with this series but I cannot agree with this. The British & Israeli forces are everywhere and very prominent while the modern Palestinian terrorist is a small minority. This is how Kosminsky shows it and I believe that to have given more prominence to the Palestinian violence would have introduced a pro-Israeli bias.I do not give 10/10 lightly but 'The Promise' has earnt it as absolute top quality viewing.