This movie feels like it was made purely to piss off people who want good shows

The story, direction, characters, and writing/dialogue is akin to taking a tranquilizer shot to the neck, but everything else was so well done.

Close shines in drama with strong language, adult themes.

This movie feels like it was made purely to piss off people who want good shows

it is only a word. defining a state more than the film itself. because the film is more than seductive. not only for the science to propose another side of a well known story. but for the impeccable cast, costumes, atmosphere, for the art to change the perspective about myth and suggest the frame and the traits of a religious conflict. a film about women and hers universe, power and decisions. not only admirable job but great example of inspired way to use a beautiful book for recreate a world of desires, fights and values. a film who change many old pictures about King Arthur legend. in convincing and subtle and admirable manner. like the novel.

...you will probably NOT enjoy the movie adaptation. Although the movie starts out well enough and I could easily ignore some of the exclusions to the story with the understanding that it was only three hours long, the changes to the plot in the last hour infuriated me. It almost seemed like they took the concept (a woman's report of the King Arthur legend) and glossed it over for a cheap rendition of the classic tale. Much of the personal strife experienced by Morgaine was glossed over and the ridiculous piousness and prejudice of Gwenevere was missing completely. One of the most moving parts of the book for me was Viviaine's demise and it was re-scripted to make it "idiot proof". The acting of the ladies particularly Anjelica Huston and Juliana Margolis was very good but the male ensemble was weak and unbelievable to me. Also one of the starkest omissions was the circumstances surrounding Gwenevere's betrothal. (no horses? what on earth?!?) Anyway to end my rambling it wasn't a great adaptation of the book, but stand alone it wasn't a terrible movie...

The Mists of Avalon (2001): Starring Angelica Houston, Joan Allen, Julianna Margulies, Michael Byrne, Edward Atterton, Samantha Mathis, Michael Vartan, Hans Matheson, Mark Lewis Jones, Clive Russell, Ian Duncan, David Calder, John Comer, Tony Curran, Karel Dobry, Biddy Hodson, Noah Huntley, Klara Issova, Edward Jewsbury, Christopher Fulford, Hugh Ross....Director Uli Edel...Screenplay Gavin Scott.Based on the popular novels by Marion Zimmer Bradley, "Mists of Avalon" was adapted into a successful, cable mini-series that nevertheless strayed from the original literary source but turned out to be a grand cinematic affair, complete with a superb and talented cast, stunning visual effects and artistic direction. The familiar legend of King Arthur, Camelot and the Knights of the Round Table is approached in a radically different manner. It has been revised so as to appear closer to the historical period where the myth of Arthur developed, the time of the warring Anglos and Saxons, as well as revised so that the female characters that figure in the legends are even more significant. Angelica Houston delivers a strong performance as the spiritual, matriarch figure "Lady of the Lake Vivien", the High Prietess of Avalon. Avalon is an eternally beautiful island, hidden in the mists, where the ancient, mysterious, primeval Goddess is worshipped. She has under her tutelege two women- Morgaine (Julianna Margulies) who is the most qualified to succeed her as High Priestess, and the darker, more ambitious sorceress Morgause (Joan Allen). While much of the same content from the old legends remain intact - i.e. Uther Pendragon beds Igraine to conceive Arthur, Arthur grows up to be king after receiving the sword Excalibur, Lancelot and Guenevere are accused of committing adultery and treason, Mordred battles Arthur, the wounded and dying Arthur is transported to Avalon - the events are manipulated behind-the-scenes by the cunning magic and influence of the women, each who have wills of their own and envision a Camelot of their own making. Morgaine and Arthur commit incest without knowing it during a pagan fertility ritual, the result of this union is the evil Mordred, who is himself reared to be king by the evil Morgause. King Arthur (Edward Atterton) finds that he loves both his friend and champion knight Lancelot (Michael Vartan) and his wife Guenevere who is bitter because she cannot bare his children. The result of this- a threesome between the three of them. Guenevere (Samantha Mathis) finds that she cannot have children, cannot have a proper husband in a king with too many loads on his back, nor a lover in Lancelot, so she retires to a convent. Morgaine learns to value spiritual matters over material ones, and throughout the film grows as a woman. Despite the attempt at a feminist version of the Arthur saga, the women cannot take matters into their own hands and instead scheme and use witchcraft to do their work, far from true feminism in which a woman proves herself worthy on her own. But even with this turn-off, the film is excessively beautiful and contains a magical, mysterious quality that takes you to another world and time. With music by Lee Holdrige and Loreena McKennitt, a popular Celtic-blooded singer of the late 90's, this is a story of interest to women, Arthurian legend lovers and Wiccans whose rites, like Beltane as depicted in the movie, are still very much a part of their religion. This movie is powerful, emotional and perhaps the only real fault is that, as many viewers have noted, the series stray from the original novel.

When I watch ''The Mists of Avalon'', I always try to think that this is a movie version, and all the reasons why the story was changed was because of it would be impossible to tell all the story from the books in just one movie. (It would be better if it was a trilogy, like Lord of the Rings in my opinion)The movie itself is good. Not great, but good. The main theme is about the ''Old Religion'',more know as Paganism, trying to resist the big amount of people becoming Christians in the old times. The end of the movie,does not have much in common with the end of the books, as well as many facts and even characters doesn't have a significant importance or even are not mentioned in the film.In the Mists of Avalon,different from many classic versions of the Arthurian legends like ''Merlin'', we have a good Morgaine, a pagan Uther,an annoying and detestable Gwenwyfar(Guinevere), as well as different facts, like Lancelot being Morgaine's and Arthur's cousin, the lady of the lake is Morgaine's aunt and the existence of Morgause, a real villain of the story. Looking more real in some facts, the Mists of Avalon has women having a real power,specially concerning the priestesses. I think the movie is worthwhile,but the books are much better.aka "As Brumas de Avalon" - Brazil