One of my all time favorites.

It is a performances centric movie

Excellent but underrated film

Blistering performances.

This film is incredibly logical.Follow the money--this "climate change" fraud (note how it morphed from "global warming" when empirical evidence showed the earth in a cooling trend) is enriching the few at the expense of the peoples of the planet.Don't mistake me for some right wing zealot either, I'm a person who vociferously believes in not wasting resources or polluting the planet. I haven't had trash service for about 18 years because I recycle virtually everything, drive an electric car, designed & built my own passive/active solar home.Al Gore is the ultimate hypocrite. At the time of filming, he was living in a mansion in Tennessee that consumed 28 times the energy of other homes in his neighborhood, buying "carbon offset credits," and flying private jets around the globe to grandstand with a Nobel Prize--makes me wanna puke. "Carbon offset credits?!" That is a colossal WTF where any logical person comes from...And finally, most of the argument for "climate change" is based on static analysis. The world is changing rapidly and technology and innovation will NATURALLY render many of the pollutants obsolete in the future, without massive governmental control and manipulation. If the government wants to steer than innovation, there is a fantastic alternative to their current folly of "picking winners and losers" (a euphemism for crony politics) and that is:Create bounties or prizes for the entities that solve the puzzles of helping make this a better planet. What is a billion dollar prize for a desalination technology or fuel cell in the grand scheme of governmental waste and corruption? You get no reward unless you make some positive change and can prove that you've built a better mousetrap!

I love pollution and don't care what I do to the environment, and when people see me littering or spraying pesticides, they shout at me and start their hippie lectures, it's highly pathetic and annoying. So I was trying to find a film that explained the other side of the global warming issue, and like this film says...There is no 'global warming issue!' Global warming is a natural cycle, not caused by man but on its own, and this film has the scientific data to back this up. Not only is it informative but it is also not biased the way Al Gore's 'an Inconvenient Truth' was. Decide for yourself which one you'd rather be; uninformed environmentalist hippie fighting for a cause that isn't there, or an educated individual who learns that there are two sides to every story. This is an excellent film and it deserves a 10/10.

A scientist's job is to question everything, even himself, so I thought this will be a documentary about how our understanding about Earth's climate may be wrong... you know... about science. What in fact I got was a big propaganda trying to discredit the work of environmentalists blaming that they do what they do for profit. That was pretty funny. Although it may be true but it is negligible to the profit of the oil industry. Let's see some other BSes in the movie:First of all the charts. Many other comments tell you about the charts, I just want to add one more thing: the fact that the CO2 quantity followed the temperature (with a lag) in the past does not say anything about the effects of adding more CO2 artificially into the atmosphere.Another argument is that CO2 comprises only a very minuscule amount of Earth's atmosphere. All right, but this means absolutely nothing. For example I have a medical condition that requires me to take 40mg of omeprasole every day. That is less then 0.00005% of my total body weight and yet it helps me.They claim that environmentalists are anti-technology, anti-development and anti-American. This can't be further away from the truth; just have a look at the Venus project, they claim that the only thing that can save us is technology (and engineers not politicians) - and they are in the US!Killing the African dream of development. Now this is the best part! They suggest that environmentalists don't allow them to use their own oil. This claim is so pathetic that I did not know whether to laugh or cry. Those poor people are really suppressed, but not by environmentalists but the powerful countries who want their oil.

I'll start talking about this documentary as it should be, honestly: it is a fraud.It's presented as a serious movie, but it doesn't take long until you realize that there's something wrong about it. Anybody who has already made a little research about Global Warming know that today's temperature are higher than in the so called "Medieval Warm Period". The graph this movie shows about the recorded temperature shows us that the temperature nowadays are way lower than in that period. I thought myself: "there's something wrong about that", and I decided to make again, a little research about it. Yes, it is a LIE. Pure, unmasked LIE. The period showed by the graph as "NOW" is actually about 1990~1995. Woah, a movie made in 2007 using a 12~15 year-old graph? That doesn't make sense. Why? Because if they had used the graph showing the temperature in, say, 2005, it wouldn't fit to their claims.There's a lot more misinformation about it than just that. I'll just leave here a link for those interested: http://www.durangobill.com/Swindle_Swindle.htmlIf you think that this movie is real, please, read the information on that link. Please! Don't let people fool yourself. Also, there was a debate on the Australian Television "ABC" about this movie with real experts which debunked almost everything in this pseudo-documentary. Look for it over at google and you'll find.