Good story, Not enough for a whole film

Excellent, Without a doubt!!

Absolutely the worst movie.

Pretty good movie overall. First half was nothing special but it got better as it went along.

Producers: H.G. Inglis and J. Lee-Thompson. An Associated British picture, made at the Associated British Elstree Studios, England. Copyright 1956 by Associated British Pictures Corp. No trace of any U.S. release. U.K. release through Associated British-Pathé: 22 April 1957. Australian release through Warner Bros Pictures: 20 November 1958. 9,413 feet. 104 minutes.SYNOPSIS: Susie Dean is a young, talented singer and dancer, who is determined to become a great star, but the touring company in which she works, "The Dinky Doos", far from setting the world alight, is on the point of closing down. Then three strangers enter Susie's life and convince her to try again. The new company, christened "The Good Companions", sets to work to put together a new show.COMMENT: As the 1933 "Good Companions" is one of my favorite films, I know that my readers will not expect me to like, let alone endorse this version. The story line is exactly the same — omitting of course many of the brightest touches and embellishments, whilst at the same time substituting the original's lively songs by parades of musical rubbish so unmemorable that even the film's producers made absolute no attempts to market them with disc jockeys.As for the players in this tedious "revival", let me quote the Monthly Film Bulletin: "Janette Scott, though conceivably a Dinky Doo, hardly convinces as a potential West End star." Hardly is exactly right! Aside from the principals, I will admit that some of the support artists do turn in some engaging portrayals: Bobby Howes, Rachel Roberts, Mona Washbourne, Thora Hird, Anthony Newley. But are they worth sitting through the rest of "The Good Companions"?

If you have seen the original 1933 version of the Good Companions then you will understand why I say that this is a vastly inferior remake.True it is in colour,but if anything it detracts rather than adds to the film.In any event by the time this film was$ made concert parties had virtually died out.The two leads are very poor.Jeanette Scott cannot sing or dance which makes her appearance rather pointless.John Fraser is an inadequate leading man.The film differs from the original in a number of ways,all to its own disadvantage.There is the tacked on show at the end which is truly dreadful and represents all that is worst in fifties British musicals.So not surprising that in the final credits it is the dancers who take the top credits.Definitely not one of Associated British Pictures better efforts

The 1957 color film is a disappointment (no real surprise), an attempt to produce a big Hollywood musical when the story didn't call for one. The re-do keeps the basic story but loses all the heart and soul of the original film.Janette Scott (daughter of Thora Hird and a one-time wife of Mel Torme!) is a pallid replacement for the ethereal Jessie Matthews. John Fraser has the John Gielgud role. Celia Johnson has the Mary Glynne role, and Eric Portman the Edmund Gwenn. Others in the cast include Mona Washbourne, Bobby Howes, Rachel Roberts, Thora Hird, Anthony Newley, Hugh Griffith, Joyce Grenfell, Marjorie Rhodes, Fabia Drake, Shirley Anne Field, Beatrice Varley, Alec McCowan, John Le Mesurier and dancers Beryl Kaye, Paddy Stone, and Irving Davies.Most notable changes in plot include Miss Trant (Celia Johnson) not having a reunion with her one-time flame. The flame here is Joyce Grenfell pursuing the dancer Jerry (Paddy Stone), thus depriving the Trant character of any kind of development. The big night for Susie Dean (Janette Scott) is turned into a comic free-for-all, thus depriving the Dean character of the astonishing sequence enjoyed by Jessie Matthews of singing amid the debris (the show must go on). The finale instead is an interminable sequence of musical numbers that show Scott as a combination Debbie Reynolds/Connie Stevens without the singing or dancing talent (she's dubbed, and her dancing is pretty much limited to being hauled around by Stone and Davies).Eric Portman serves as a would-be love interest for Johnson, but of course he's married, so that's a dead end. John Fraser seems totally lost in the John Gielgud role of Inigo Jollifant (funny no one ever asks him to repeat his odd name). Most of the remainder have little to do.Then there's the usually dour Rachel Roberts who explodes in a solo number "The Gentleman Is a Heel." Who knew she could sing? The ever lovable Joyce Grenfell has a great scene with a cake. Her final line there is something like "Take this away, it's of no use now." When this came out in 1957, the original film had likely been unseen since 1933 so comparisons were unlikely. Taking that into consideration this was probably seen as a serviceable musical for the times, and definitely a star vehicle for 19-year-old Scott.Grenfell had hit stage show a few years earlier in London and New York. Cast members included the film's dancers: Irving Davies, Paddy Stone, and Beryl Kaye.

I considered "The Good Companions" simply made and entertaining, as was the novel. The actors were well cast and each played their part to perfection. It was unusual for a British studio to 'try' a musical at that period of time, and I think it came off pretty well. For me it is an unexpected, delightful offering such as "Curtain Up".