SERIOUSLY. This is what the crap Hollywood still puts out?

Best movie ever!

Although it has its amusing moments, in eneral the plot does not convince.

This is a small, humorous movie in some ways, but it has a huge heart. What a nice experience.

I like B-grade sci-fi, but this one is even below my standards. I can't think of anything good to say about it but this - if you can find the MST3K production you'll have a great time. The movie is terrible, but the terribleness can't be fully appreciated until you see Joel and the Robots give their inimitable critique. They nail some rip-snorters out of this one. Sadly, all I have is a VHS version recorded from TV that I ripped onto a DVD (yuck) and I've never found it on any of their compilations. It's disappointing because along with "It Conquered the World" it's my MST3K guilty-pleasure favorite.As far as the stand-alone movie, forget about it - unless you like really bad directing, acting and unlikable characters.

Just recently, I wrote some comments on director Larry Buchanan's abysmal sci-fi outing "Zontar, The Thing From Venus" (1966), a made-for-TV product that was a scene-for-scene remake of Roger Corman's infinitely superior "It Conquered the World" (1956). But "Zontar" wasn't the first time that Buchanan had turned a beloved piece of sci-fi shlock into televised dreck. In 1965, he had taken the tacky but enjoyable 1957 film "Invasion of the Saucer Men" and transformed it, for AIP, into "The Eye Creatures," and the resultant picture is one that manages the near-impossible feat of being even lamer than "Zontar," and, concomitantly, even harder to sit through...while awake, that is. As was the case with "Zontar," this is a completely unnecessary remake that is an affront to a beloved original; one that is vastly inferior in all departments, as well. And like the 1966 film, "TEC" is virtually a scene-for-scene rehash of its original, with even lamer special FX, weaker acting and all-around inept filmmaking, as compared to its predecessor; the use of color film in both does absolutely nothing to improve on their B&W originals.In "The Eye Creatures," the titular invaders from outer space land their flying saucer in the heartland of good ol' U.S.A. (No, wait a minute...strike that. It's impossible to say whether or not these alien beings are "invaders" or not, as all the poor things do is land their craft, get out and lumber around. Their only real crime is their alien physiognomy....) While the military blunders around trying to track the ship and later vainly attempts an entry, a pair of teens, Stan (John Ashley) and Susan (Cynthia Hull), actually smash into one of the aliens while driving on a nighttime country road. This leads to all sorts of problems with the local cops, a crusty old nearby hermit, and a pair of drifters in town, all culminating in a showdown between Stan and Susie, their fellow teens, and the doddering starmen, who, as in the original film, have an unfortunate Achilles' heel in the form of...automobile headlights! Even Jim Stark and his galpal Judy never encountered a situation like this!As I've mentioned elsewhere, director Buchanan is now a very solid 4 for 4 with me; besides "TEC" and "Zontar," the other films that I've seen from this "auteur"--1966's "Curse of the Swamp Creature" and 1967's "Mars Needs Women"--have also been rock-bottom deplorable, practically comprising a loosely connected quartet of sci-fi crud. And sad to say, "The Eye Creatures" may very well be the worst of this sorry lot. But don't blame John Ashley; he is as likable as ever here, and the only real pro in this cast of amateurs. Ms. Hull isn't quite as bad as she might have been, but her character is a shrill, weak and unattractive mess; Stan could have done SO much better. (On a side note, the real-life Ashley apparently DID do a lot better, as this DVD features a lengthy interview with his former Mrs., who turns out to be both beautiful and well spoken.) All of the film's other actors are simply embarrassing; Tony Huston, who was so remarkably bad in "Zontar," appears here again to discomfit and appall the viewer. The film insists on regaling the audience with "comedy" segments of a very low order, all of which bomb completely. Thus, we see Houston and another Army imbecile use their infrared scanner not to look for the alien craft, but rather to peep on the teenagers necking in their cars on Lovers Lane, and are treated to the sight of a bald, goofy-looking general emerging from his bedroom wearing a leopard-skin bathrobe! The FX in the film, as mentioned, are also horrendous (you'll wonder just what the picture's reputed $40,000 budget was spent on!). Just observe the sight of that alien spaceship orbiting the Earth; it looks like a child's top set against a cardboard diorama; the kind of thing a 4th grader might come up with for a science project. (The exact same special effect, flabbergastingly, was used in "Zontar" to depict the "laser satellite" that that film's alien hitches a ride in!) And as for those eye creatures themselves, they are something of a sorry misnomer; white, bipedal and covered with innumerable lumps, not eyes, they fail to engender even the slightest shudder. (But I suppose a title such as "The Lumpy Creatures" might have smacked a little too much of "Leave it to Beaver"!) Paul Blaisdell's memorable monsters for "It Conquered" and "Saucer Men" are in another league entirely compared to those found in the two remakes, to put it mildly! As in the "Saucer Men" film, "TEC" gives a nod to the 1946 horror classic "The Beast With Five Fingers"--as well as to the 1963 shlocker "The Crawling Hand"--in the form of a detached alien, um, crawling hand, and poorly done as this special effect is here, it yet serves to generate the film's only moment of suspense, as we await Susie's inevitable, hysterical scream of terror when she discovers the darn thing on her. Surprisingly, the revered "Maltin Movie Guide" calls "The Eye Creatures," inept sci-fi dreck that it is, a "gory horror film," when in fact there is only a single scene with any blood whatsoever, and even that is hard to discern during one of the nighttime lensings. What's more surprising is the fact that "Maltin" gives the film 1 1/2 stars to begin with, rather than its lowest BOMB rating. Go figure!For those who care, "The Eye Creatures" comes to us today via a RetroMedia Entertainment DVD. Residing on the flip side of this disc is the "Zontar" film itself, resulting in one truly deadly double feature. I have said elsewhere that these two awful films result in a disc only suitable for use as skeet, but perhaps I was being a bit unfair. This DVD disc can also serve as a decorative cocktail coaster, as well!

*Spoiler/plot- The Eye Creatures, 1965. Several teenagers in cars are out at night for some fun. They come across some strange happenings and find out about an invasion of space aliens. They try but have difficulties to get the word to the police authorities and fight the invaders themselves.*Special Stars- John Ashley, Cynthia Hull, Warren Hammack, Chet Davis.*Theme- Nighttime is the best time for seeing alien creatures.*Trivia/location/goofs- B & W. Day and night scenes change in the middle of dialog. Some eye creatures are only wearing a head mask only with black shirts and pants and sneakers.*Emotion- This film is unfortunately an obvious film plot 'by formula'. It's simplistic, and very boring to watch. 'The Blob' was a huge movie hit years before and this film copied almost every plot scene by scene from 'The Blob' only changing the incidental monster and very few trivial movie elements. So this 50's B-movie spin-off is not worth your viewing time or energies. See 'The Blob' original instead with Steven McQueen(And yes, that McQueen).

First of all,this is a remake of Invasion of the Saucer Men,but this movie isn't near as good as that one.Why? Lousy script.Bad "special" effects and last,you can SEE that some of the Eye Creatures only have the headpiece on and that's it! Some are wearing black shirt and pants and tennis shoes.Plus,it goes from day to night and back again in one shot! The so-called "night" shots look as though they were filmed in the afternoon.And let's not forget the title either.The original title was The Eye Creatures,but I think when it was re-released,some idiot decided to add "Attack of the" on the front to make it "Attack of the the Eye Creatures"..I've seen this by way of Mystery Science Theater 3000 and believe me,that's the only way to view this.Not unless you like movies that move slowly..Bad? Yes.Fun to watch on a rainy night? Maybe.As bad as "Plan 9"??? You be the judge..Have fun!!