Purely Joyful Movie!

The movie is wonderful and true, an act of love in all its contradictions and complexity

Great story, amazing characters, superb action, enthralling cinematography. Yes, this is something I am glad I spent money on.

The movie really just wants to entertain people.

"Der Totmacher" or "Deathmaker" is a German 110-minute movie from 1995, so it had its 20th anniversary last year. The writer and director is Romuald Karmakar and it is easily the most known work by him. A lot of that also has to do with the film's success in terms of awards recognition. It won the grand prize at the German Film Awards (Outstanding Feature Film), brought Karmakar, who was only 30 back then, the directors' trophy and lead actor Götz George also won, while his co-lead Jürgen Hentsch was "only" nominated. This film is about Fritz Haarmann, one of Germany's most notorious serial killers and he was also the main inspiration for Fritz Lang's "M". over half a century before this film already. But back to this one here. It is really all about George's performance and he can let it all out without ever seeming desperate, cringeworthy or hammy in my opinion. Hentsch was good too and he was in basically every scene of this film as he was the guy interrogating Haarmann from start to finish. But he was really just a trigger that got the best out of George on many occasions.Do not be fooled here: This is a very dark film that takes us into the abyss of a deranged human soul, namely Haarmann's. Theer is lots of profanity in here, but the talk about how people were graphically murdered and also the talk about many sexual references (very explicit!) is nothing for the easily offended. But it is essential as it helps a lot in finding out who Haarmann really was. George died earlier this year and this work from over 2 decades ago is without a doubt one of the finest things he left us. I am not surprised the film was submitted by Germany to the Oscars, but I am not really surprised it did not get nominated as I can see some people not finding access to the material in terms of the dramatic impact it makes. But those who (like myself) will be really rewarded with a quality piece. Maybe the premise also was too simple for the Academy voters. It is basically from start to finish 2 people (sometimes more) in an interrogation chamber and a film cannot really be more dialogue-driven than this one here. What Haarmann says and how he says it are easily the heart and soul of the movie. I also believe, due to the setting, that this is a perfect film to turn into a play on the theater stage, but I have not really come across many approaches from that direction sadly. Maybe they were just scared because they probably never would be as good as the original. But it's fine, they don't have to be in my opinion. They can still be good and another approach on the subject would be interesting to see. Anyway, about this film here, I highly recommend the watch to everybody who likes psychological thrillers, crime movies or just lead actor Götz George. They will be really well-entertained by this bold and relentless (positively meant of course) achievement. You really do not want to miss out.

Would a different translation have made it chillier or scarier? Are the subtitles too compact to convey the nuances of the original language? Does it even matter? You may have heard that great actors can make reading a phone book exciting. Well, this is an opportunity to judge for yourself. If this isn't about homosexuality, murder, dismemberment, psychopaths, insanity, deviant psychology, then it is about acting - acting helped along with lots of dialog, So, enjoy the acting or muse about how titillating the dialog actually is.For English speakers, "Twelve Angry Men" might be a better choice. There's a bit more interaction, and you can judge if the acting is consistent with the dialog. You don't have to wonder if you're missing something.I would recommend Andy Warhol's "Empire" to those who like this film.

"Deathmaker" is an outstanding movie. It's psychologically intense and very well played, BUT...The major problem of this feature is that the director chose the wrong medium for his project. The story told in "Deathmaker" would fit better into a (classical) theater. The whole setting is placed in one room only, there are less than a dozen actors needed and no (!) optical and only few sound effects are used. Nothing indicates that this story needs all the technical possibilities of cinematography. So this movie is - in my eyes - nothing more than a theater play filmed for distribution of the piece beyond theaters The story itself is quiet slow - many will find it boring or too long. There is nearly no action at all in it. Majorly three people sitting on chairs in a room together and talking. If you can sympathize with this kind of storytelling, then you should watch this movie. Else I can not recommend it.

George realy did a perfect job in this! Based on the historical examination script they deliver a film that comes very close to your stomach. Some people I know couldn´t stand it and turned it off and some turned the video off, because they were bored. Try it yourself! This is absolutely an about average view on the so popular subject "serial killer". I watched it late at night with 100 percent thrill and interest.