It's fun, it's light, [but] it has a hard time when its tries to get heavy.

I like movies that are aware of what they are selling... without [any] greater aspirations than to make people laugh and that's it.

It's funny watching the elements come together in this complicated scam. On one hand, the set-up isn't quite as complex as it seems, but there's an easy sense of fun in every exchange.

Close shines in drama with strong language, adult themes.

Same idea as it's 2011 counterpart, but more poorly executed. Further, the actor they found to fill Freddy's role just didn't fit very well. The dialog is largely boring. I wasn't invested at all in this film and they did very little to try and capture my attention.As a huge fan of the franchise, you would think it'd be awfully hard to make Freddy Krueger and his story boring and yet somehow they managed to do just that. The best part of the film was the art they did for the cover/poster. You can find it for free on YouTube, you be the judge, but I feel it's a waste of a half an hour.

The writer/director of this rubbish obviously has good friends, but bad skills in film-making... why else would an atrocious viewing experience like this get such high ratings.Do people actually like these poorly made fan-films? Do they not have access to the REAL productions that these are based on, and can only watch free videos online? I for one, think that I am pretty much done with these fan-films. They are becoming a pain to watch. Out of the dozens I've seen, only a few of them are tolerable to watch and actually entertaining. Seems like, for being "fans", they are completely missing the point of the source material and taking their stories in the wrong direction(in my opinion).Why do I loathe this so? Well, above all else, the over-acting... especially from the lead Freddy wanna-be is so appalling and literally hurt my soul to watch. The only reason that this short got a 2 star rating from me and not the lowest one star, is because I thought the production value(for the most part) was relatively decent, as opposed to the billions of fan shorts out there that look like they were filmed with a cellphone camera from the '90s. Which, honestly, isn't hard to pull off with the extremely affordable digital cameras these days that all have great video capturing abilities.I usually try not to be so negative in my reviews, but this was so bad in my eyes that I seriously can't think of any other way to put it. It's just plain BAD! All in all, nice try, Milliner. But... FAIL! Next time, try to tackle something original and DO NOT try and put your own spin on a horror icon that we all know and love all too well. Like they always say, "don't fix it if it ain't broke". 'Nuff said!

With the recent passing of horror master Wes Craven, you don't have to search hard to find people talking about the legacy and mark he's left on horror, filmmakers, and stories. His original Nightmare, released in 1984, introduced us to one of the most prolific characters in modern film, Freddy Krueger, who was played as equal parts dark, demented, and hilarious by Robert Englund.It's disappointing that Craven never got to see the mark he left on artist and filmmaker Nathan Thomas Milliner, whose 30-minute love letter to the series is truly one of the greatest fan films ever made. Set in the 1970s, after Kruger is found and arrested for his crimes, Milliner's Confession focuses on Freddy the man, who is still a monster, but before he became the creature of literal nightmares, as he describes the heinous acts he has committed to a police detective during interrogation.Fanboys will surely cringe to hear it, but watching Milliner's take on the stories and characters, it's clear that Englund is not the only actor who could ever play Freddy properly. He may, indeed, be the man who brought to life the boiler room devil behind the makeup, but in actor Kevin Roach, Milliner may have found the perfect man to portray Freddy as a sadistic killer. Roach's portrayal is one that should be praised, as he takes bits of what Englund did for the character, but makes it his own, bringing to life an intensity and intelligence in Kruger we don't get to always see, all the while keeping the subtle humor intact.Watching the film as someone who highly appreciates not only the original Nightmare series, but also of Craven's work in general, it's clear as day that Milliner is a die-hard fan of the legendary filmmaker. Between the research that must have gone into this short to keep it canon, to the bits of dialog ripped straight from non-Nightmare Craven films, it was one of the most enjoyable films I've had the pleasure of watching this year.It's great that with such a small budget, Milliner was able to create a film that feels very much like a full-blown studio production. Obviously his talents as an artist (especially in the horror genre; Milliner has drawn covers for over a dozen Scream! Factory releases of cult horror films) help him in visualizing the look of his film, because it's got the polished look of a big budget masterpiece while maintaining the dark, dingy feel of A Nightmare on Elm Street. The costumes and settings really added to the perfect look of an incredible short.Personally, I would love to see more filmmakers not just create homages to the films that inspired them, but to actually take up a bit of the story and make it their own in this way. What Milliner has done for the characters and the films with his Confession was inspired by his love of horror and of Wes Craven's A Nightmare on Elm Street, but what it seems he has done is make a piece worthy in itself of being inspiration.

and it's partially hit, mostly miss for me.I watched the trailer when it came out and I thought it was derivative of other projects, but seemed to be shot well. The film was released online recently so I decided to give it a watch.Well... I think this is a fairly decent attempt, but I think I was right about it borrowing a bit too much from what's already been done in regard to a prequel to A Nightmare on Elm Street.Three things about the film stick out in my mind.1) The grungy, dirty homeless outcast Freddy was attempted a few years ago in a film called "Son of a Hundred Maniacs" that was never made. I didn't think that version of Freddy worked then and I don't now. It's way too obvious that this drifter version of Freddy would be the Springwood Slasher. It would be no surprise and way less frightening to the police and the people of Springwood and what child would be lured away by this Freddy? Yes, I know that there is a short story that portrays Fred this way but it is not canon.2) There are quite a few scenes that seem lifted directly out of the short film series "Krueger: Tales from Elm Street". Most of "The Confession of Fred Krueger" revolves around an interrogation scene (done in "A Tale from Elm Street"), plus there's some exact same cinematography such as Freddy stalking in a playground (done in "Another Tale from Elm Street"), Freddy slinking along a building in daylight (done in "A Walk Through Elm Street", the detective being dragged out of the interrogation room (again done in "A Tale from Elm Street") and more. Confessions even has it's Freddy say "pretty please" during the interrogation, lifting dialogue directly from the Krueger series.3) The film is decently shot, the score is great, but the acting is very singular. Not a cut on the actor who plays Freddy as the character was written that way, but again, it's not canon and leaves no room for the actor to really show any versatility. All of this, of course, is just my opinion. I felt the Krueger series did all of the above better. They also did it first.