Very disappointed :(

Good story, Not enough for a whole film

Simple and well acted, it has tension enough to knot the stomach.

It is not only a funny movie, but it allows a great amount of joy for anyone who watches it.

We rented this movie and "21" as preparation for a trip to Vegas in a few weeks for our friend's wedding and bachelor party. We tried "21" first and got about, maybe, 30 minutes into it and had to shut it off. Too damn slow! How is a movie about Vegas that boring? So, we popped in this flick and, low and behold, it was damn good. Well, it certainly got us jazzed about going to Vegas anyway. We laughed our asses off in several spots, especially at the end and the movie makes you want to run out to Vegas and rob the casinos...or at least win big! My girlfriend is cool and would probably like it, but there is a lot of nudity, so bear that in mind if your girl isn't as cool as mine! I figure "21" probably cost $50 million to make and this film was probably $1 million and ten times better so I give it a big thumbs up.

This was simply a great movie to watch. There was a great plot of the casino heist type and the use of interesting characters really pulled the whole production together. The length was just right and it keeps you interested all the way until the end. Simply a great low budget movie without the low budget feel.One highlight was the use of Jay Anthony Franke from the days of California Dreams, he played Jake. I thought the guy looked familiar and then found out who he was. If you have interest in film making, listen to the director commentary, it was very well thought out and you can learn a lot about what was going on during the production. It really puts the movie in a new light.

I thought the film overall was a decent one. Not the greatest but decent. You can totally tell it is a low budget film, yet does what it needs to do. Entertain. I watched it with my boyfriend and while there is a lot of nudity, that kind of stuff does not bother me. It had an entertaining story, somewhat likable characters, and some funny moments. Was it perfect? No, but it was decent for about an hour and a half. I would give it around a 6.5 on a 1-10 scale. If you get easily offended by nudity this is not for you. If you want a popcorn flick with good looking women and a fun story, pop it in. I think some of the people here expect too much from movies nowadays. It did not appear to have a huge budget. If this were a 10 million dollar film, OK then...i'd agree. But I think they did the best with what they had. The director seems to be new along with most of the cast. Decent job overall. Not perfect but decent. 6.5 out of 10 from me.

I got the chance to see this film at a sneak preview last week here in Las Vegas. It was a lot of fun and much funnier than I expected. The story is really good and entertaining and the robbery itself is original and very clever (although a bit complicated for someone who doesn't go to casinos). There were a number of twists toward the end that I never saw coming which always scores big points for me. The only two little criticisms I could name would be that one of the actors came across as a little weak and there was a decent amount of nudity that was probably not completely necessary. I was told by one of the crew that their budget was about the same as "Blair Witch". If that's true, this film was a GREAT accomplishment for the level they were able to achieve on that alone!