One of the wrost movies I have ever seen
... View MoreDon't listen to the Hype. It's awful
... View MoreThe film makes a home in your brain and the only cure is to see it again.
... View MoreAmazing worth wacthing. So good. Biased but well made with many good points.
... View MoreSometimes, the background story of a certain film production is more interesting than the actual film itself. This is definitely the case here. "The Brute Man" and the more or less simultaneously produced "House of Horror" both star Rondo Hatton and only got released after his death at the age of 51. Hatton suffered from Acromegaly, a terrible illness which caused for the bones in his body to deform badly. As an effect from his Acromegaly, Hatton looked like an authentic boogeyman without make-up and thus he quickly got typecast as monstrous and merciless killer, like The Creeper in the two aforementioned titles. Allegedly the good people at Universal Studios became so ashamed and remorseful about exploiting Hatton's looks and condition that they decided to sell the rights of "The Brute Man" to an inferior yet more unscrupulous production company. Is it immoral and completely insensitive to cash in on the physical handicaps of actors and deliberately use their disfigurements to frighten viewers? Yes, probably On the other hand, it was Hatton's looks that put the food on the table during the last years of his life and made him a cult monument. If he was a "regular" actor, Hatton would have been long forgotten, but now – more than sixty years after his death – he's still a genre legend almost as famous as Boris Karloff or Lon Chaney even though he starred in a lot less films. "The Brute Man" on itself, with its running time of barely 1 hour, is actually a very passable and unmemorable film. Hatton stars as Hal Moffat, but the tabloids and news bulletins baptized him as The Creeper. Moffat is out on a vengeance spree to kill all the people that he holds responsible for the chemistry lab accident that mutilated his face. Whilst on the run for the police, he breaks into the apartment of blind but beautiful and gentle piano teacher Helen Paige. Since she can't see his face and refuses to judge him, a tender friendship develops between them. The plot – as far as there is one – makes very little sense. The film somehow wants us to believe that Hal Moffat is basically a good and gracious person who got wronged by various opponents. But, quite frankly, what happened to him at school is ludicrous and he was responsible for his accident himself. Also, even though he's being sensitive and warm to Helen he still continues his murder spree and also kills innocent people like grocery delivery boys. The police hunt for The Creeper is dull and the entire story is pretty much told in a mere ten minutes.
... View MoreSolid chiller, capitalizing on the popularity of Rondo Hatton's creeper character made popular in the Sherlock Holmes classic, "The Pearl of Death", has The Creeper on the rampage breaking the backs of those he deems responsible for his facial abnormalities, which occurred when a college rival infuriates his temper (both were affectionate for a beauty in their same graduation class) causing a mishap in the chemistry lab. The police have a city-wide manhunt in place, with lots of pressure on Captain MJ Donelly (Donald MacBride) to find The Creeper with the public in a state of panic, the psychopath a media sensation, making all the headlines. The police continue to have a black eye with the city mayor becoming more and more frustrated the longer The Creeper remains at large and not arrested. The possible key to The Creeper's capture is his utter hatred for the former rival, Clifford Scott (Tom Neal) and his wife, Virginia (Jan Wiley), the two he especially holds responsible for his ugly facial scars. Hatton's Hal Moffet was once a rising football star and Clifford was his scholarly tutor, both in love with Virginia. However, Clifford was the man she was in love with and the nerd made sure Hal got placed in the lab thanks to a failing grade. Jane Adams (the lovely hunchback nurse who met a gruesome fate in "House of Dracula") has a crucial role in the potential apprehension of The Creeper as a blind piano instructor he falls in love with (she cannot see his face, therefore does not frighten at his hideous visage). The Creeper wants her to get an eye operation and will try to finagle money from Clifford, with problems ensuing Like other movies in the same vein, "The Brute Man" sympathizes with a beastly man suffering from the unpleasantness of fate, whether it is a hunched back, ugliness in appearance, or some other bodily malformation that horrifies "normal society". While acknowledging his crimes and not making excuses for them, this film still empathizes with Hatton's grotesque features (not exactly a comment directly from me, but just in the way movies imply how unpleasant he looks), and having him befriending a kindly blind woman who probably would not judge his looks if she had sight just further elaborates a sense of mourning for his predicament, asking us to at least invest emotionally in the way society cringes at his presence, screaming out instead of simply listening to him before doing so. Still, he kills a woman who cries out because she feels threatened and a teenage grocery courier, so Hal isn't a completely sympathetic figure; he's a bonafide killer who needs to be taken off the streets. This movie definitely has the look and feel of a Universal Studios release, with Hatton's involvement a major factor in its appeal to fans of classic horror. Not deserved of such a low rating, I think "The Brute Man" is worthy of discovery.It is so tragic that Hatton did not live long enough to see how much people enjoyed his brief work in the movies--yes, his condition was exploited in a manner that turned him into almost a sideshow, but I think "The Brute Man" establishes that the actor could in fact earn pathos instead of just walking around as a hulking brute destroying people.
... View MoreWhile it's by no means a classic of any kind, THE BRUTE MAN nonetheless rates a look- primarily because of its star, Rondo Hatton. Soft spoken and intelligent, he gives an understated performance that, in its own limited way, rivals that of Charlie Chaplin in CITY LIGHTS. I cite the Chaplin movie only because of the similarity in the storyline: both deal with men who fall for blind women (both of whom need "an operation" to restore their sight) and fear that, once able to see, the women will reject them (Chaplin because he's down and out, Hatton because he's "disfigured"). The direction as well as the supporting performances are something less than stellar (this is the guy who gave us the motionless picture SHE-WOLF OF London, one of the biggest cheats to come down the pike since MARK OF THE VAMPIRE), but Hatton as "The Creeper" comes across as somewhat sympathetic- especially when the blind girl attempts to touch his face: he turns away abruptly, and one can't help but factor his action(s) into his Real World experiences.
... View MoreBefore I begin talking about BRUTE MAN, there's some important information you should know about the star of the film, Rondo Hatton. Earlier in life, he's led a rather normal existence, though he later developed acromegaly--which caused his features to become disproportional and deformed. He was truly an ugly man in need of work and Universal Studios thought he'd be a natural to play monsters, as he needed no makeup. Considering how exploitational this seems, I couldn't help but feeling sorry for the guy and thinking about this throughout BRUTE MAN. As a result, though it wasn't a bad little B-film, I couldn't really enjoy it very much. I felt like a customer at a freak show, gawking at this poor guy.As for the film, it's a very short and not especially memorable suspense film. A guy was disfigured in a laboratory accident and since then, he has been rather indiscriminately killing people. The police dub him "The Creeper" and despite being exceptionally noticeable, the police have a heck of a time catching him.The acting is fine and the production is fine--not distinguished but acceptable for a B. However, as I said above, I had a hard time enjoying it knowing that around the time the film was completed, Hatton died from his illness.
... View More