I saw this movie before reading any reviews, and I thought it was very funny. I was very surprised to see the overwhelmingly negative reviews this film received from critics.

Each character in this movie — down to the smallest one — is an individual rather than a type, prone to spontaneous changes of mood and sometimes amusing outbursts of pettiness or ill humor.

The biggest problem with this movie is it’s a little better than you think it might be, which somehow makes it worse. As in, it takes itself a bit too seriously, which makes most of the movie feel kind of dull.

Mostly, the movie is committed to the value of a good time.

This is really a film aimed at a children's audience which is maybe why I didn't go to see it when it was released.Then again it may be that it only got a limited release on the National circuit.Directed by Ealing alumni Charles Crichton and featuring just two actors familiar to UK audiences in Warren Mitchell and George Coulouris.There is a lot of Spanish location work with the interiors and a lot of post sync- hing done at Pinewood..The story is a bit simple minded with the child stealing money from the bank where he works in order to pay for the repairs to his father's dog.Throughout his adventures he is accompanied by a rather fetching terrier.

Charles Crichton directed Ealing classics such as The Titfield Thunderbolt, The Lavender Hill Mob as well as his earlier "Hue and Cry". These latter two have similarities to TBWSAM in having an extended chase sequence. However Crichton forsakes his customary very English locations for Spain. The film consists, with a brief preamble scene setting, of an hour long chase filmed in out and through the streets of Valencia as the young thief evades his pursuers. It must be the longest and one of the most inventive and superbly directed chase scenes in film history.The chase involves the young "thief", his dog, crowds, cars, bicycles, groups on foot, animals, trams; apparently covering much of Valencia. It is a masterful handling of all these very different independent elements involved in the chase, the flow appearing seamlessly but of course infinitely choreographed by Crichton in an eclectic range of city locations. I am not sure that this combination of splendid cinematography, choice of location, direction and editing has been equalled. A great performance from the lead, the young boy, Pasco, and (again a seamless) ensemble of British and Spanish cast. It is however rather let down by the writing, it is rather pedestrian and the resolution at the end disappointing.Why it is never seen is a mystery. However at least it is being screened by Talking Pictures in the UK who seem to have a unique talent for picking out the gems that others have entirely missed. Why it received no awards is another mystery - perhaps connected with the first. The film so closely resembles one of those Continent classics of the era by one of the directorial Masters. Is it that only the Continentals are acceptable doing The Continental - by the British as much as by anyone else?

Paco's father needs 10,000 Ptas to get his taxi back from the mechanic, and Paco has a job in a bank. In this fairy tale of early 60's Spain, the little boy just walks off with the money, and virtually the whole of the wrong side of town go looking for him, along with the police. Socially the film touches on the differences between the lives of the wealthy and the poor, the scavengers who live from sorting through rubbish dumps, the extravagant fiestas with their music, fireworks and dancing.