The Worst Film Ever

Simple and well acted, it has tension enough to knot the stomach.

If you're interested in the topic at hand, you should just watch it and judge yourself because the reviews have gone very biased by people that didn't even watch it and just hate (or love) the creator. I liked it, it was well written, narrated, and directed and it was about a topic that interests me.

Let me be very fair here, this is not the best movie in my opinion. But, this movie is fun, it has purpose and is very enjoyable to watch.

Synchromy (1971) *** (out of 4)This Norman McLaren short certainly won't appeal to everyone but I must say that I found it to be rather hypnotic in its own way. There's really not too much of a plot but there's an original score that gets played with various colorful images in the background being synced to it. Again, if it's plot you're wanting then you're not going to find it here but the film works on many different levels. For starters, the score itself is quite good and there's just a certain feel to it that drags you into the movie and keeps you mind solely on what you're listening to. Visually the film is also quite impressive because of how the shapes fit the music. I'd also argue that the actual colors and shapes used were quite creative and I really thought the brown up against the pink looked excellent.

"Synchromy" is a 7.5-minute animated short film by Norman McLaren from 1971. It is already 45 years ago since he made this one and still it was one of his final works. This is a bit surprising as this one here is also a contender for what would be his most energetic film. It is colorful, bright and the soundtrack is very wild. Sadly, it wasn't working for me at all and this may possibly be the worst film I have seen from McLaren so far. Watching it is almost painful on the eye and the annoying music is not helping at all either. I really wished this could have been shorter and I usually do not have that attitude when it comes to Norman McLaren's work. I certainly cannot recommend this one. Thumbs down from me and I suggest you check out some of his earlier work.

The plot synopsis says the visuals are an "artistic representation of the sound track".I'd venture to say that the visuals ARE the soundtrack, optically printed into the frame. The frequencies look correct, and the widths look like normal 35mm soundtracks. Given that McLaren often hand-painted his soundtracks, this would not be too far a stretch. It would have been a simple matter to use an optical printer and expose the tracks in the picture area of the film. This was my first thought when viewing the film. I can't imagine him painting the soundtrack, and then going back and making pictures over again to "represent" the track, when the artwork was already there for the taking.

McLaren mixes coloured horizontal bands of varying width (depending on the tibre of the music) across the screen. Albeit basic visuals he mixes visual pace with sounds represented by thin and thick stripes ,it looks like how you would imagine hard drives to sound like when processing information. Great stuff