Pretty good movie overall. First half was nothing special but it got better as it went along.

The acting in this movie is really good.

Great story, amazing characters, superb action, enthralling cinematography. Yes, this is something I am glad I spent money on.

The story, direction, characters, and writing/dialogue is akin to taking a tranquilizer shot to the neck, but everything else was so well done.

"Strings" is an animated short film from 1991, so this one is already over 25 years old and it was written and directed by Canadian Wendy Tilby and yes this is another NFB production and like many others this also managed to get in at the Oscars. It runs for 10 minutes, slightly over, and was seemingly the first filmmaking effort by Tilby and she's on it still today having scored two more Oscar nominations in the last decades. If you take a look at the animation style, you can easily see that they weren't even trying to compete with the glory days of Disney, WB and others and they were just going for new approaches. It is all subjective how you will like them, but I personally didn't too much sadly. Especially the character animation of the old lady I found particularly unappealing. I can see the efforts without a doubt and those were massive, but the overall outcome leaves me as unimpressed as the actual Oscar winner that year. Yet to see the third nominee. As for this one here, neither story nor animation I found memorable enough to give it a thumbs-up or a positive recommendation. My suggestion is you watch something else instead. The Oscar nomination is definitely way too much and it can impossibly have been a year this weak for animated shorts. Oh yeah final note the good news is that if you still wanna watch it, then you can wherever you are from and which languages you speak because there is no audible dialogue in here. But like I said best is to skip it and I hope Tilby stepped things up since then.

This is one of two short animated films that were nominated for the 1992 Oscar for this category. It seems that the Canadian National Film Board sponsors many animated shorts and this is one of many I have seen from them that was Oscar nominated--my favorite of which might just be THE BIG SNIT from 1985. However, in most ways this older and the newer films are like complete opposites. THE BIG SNIT has only passable animation but the story is so funny and the humor so bizarre I couldn't help but like it. With STRINGS, the story really didn't seem all that important--I was taken in more by the exceptional and striking graphics.As for whether I liked the film, it was nice but not one to get terribly excited about and in retrospect, all three Oscar nominees that year were rather limp. Of the three, my favorite is STRINGS and is worth a peek.

Another good short animated by the National Film Board of Canada. In her 3rd floor apartment, a woman works on a miniature version of the Titanic. She takes a bath with it. In the apartment below her, a man is hosting a dinner with members of a string quartet. And they play music. The kind of music that was probably playing on the famous boat before it sank. Back on the 3rd floor, there's a leak. It will get to the point that the chandelier downstairs will just fall, like the ones in the Titanic after the encounter with the iceberg. But the ending brings doubt. What to make of it? That is the question...Seen at home, on January 25th, 2005.81/100 (***)

This short, nominated for an Academy Award, is a story first and foremost, for all that there's no notable dialogue. The animation is relatively simple and straightforward (although the detail of the backgrounds is quite good) and the events unfold as the short goes on. I'm still not quite sure what to make of the ending and find the short a trifle unsettling, but it's well worth watching. Produced by the National Film Board of Canada, it used to run on the Cartoon Network periodically on O Canada. Recommended.