Too much about the plot just didn't add up, the writing was bad, some of the scenes were cringey and awkward,

Your blood may run cold, but you now find yourself pinioned to the story.

if their story seems completely bonkers, almost like a feverish work of fiction, you ain't heard nothing yet.

It’s fine. It's literally the definition of a fine movie. You’ve seen it before, you know every beat and outcome before the characters even do. Only question is how much escapism you’re looking for.

Even without a missing "s", audiences will probably know immediately what this movie "Sisi" is about, namely the young Elizabeth, the character that defined Romy Schneider's career. The director here is Sisi and the script comes from a bunch of Italian writers. Another Italian is lead actress Cristiana Capotondi who plays the title character here. It is a television production from 2009, so 7 years old by now and it was aired in 2 parts of 100 minutes each, which means that this film (/ these films) runs for considerable longer than 3 hours: But I guess they needed that time as the original trilogy makes it past the 4.5-hour mark and this one here is of course a remake that takes us from the first meeting between Sisi and Franz Joseph over them becoming a married couple and parents (of a sick child) and finally ends with Sissi creating peace between Austrians and Hungarians.So much for the plot. I guess everybody who considers seeing this not too known film here has probably seen the old films at least once, so no need to go into detail. And that reference to the old films is crucial. Schneider and Marischka get away with a lot that seems out-dated and over-the-top by today's standards, but this new film here has no excuse for certain moments and scenes I have to say. Also the film lacks (like the old) one characters that have shades really. You could probably make an argument for Franz Joseph, but the way Sissi is depicted, she is such a perfect saint and woman of everybody's dreams (I am not talking about her looks in this case) that her perfection is really utterly cringeworthy. The exact opposite is Martina Gedeck's character who has no shades either and is depicted as pure evil and her dedication to the crown is not really working as an excuse to justify her character's actions.I would call this film (these two parts) gooey schmaltz and drama that rarely felt authentic. I wish they could have tried to make a more relevant films in terms of today's film and not just basically make a copy in terms of story, emotions and characters. All this has been done and has been done better for the most part. The best thing here is probably that Capotondi was a decent choice for the main part, even if she is not the greatest actress either. But she does not need to be to make most of her character work, also because the other actors are not exactly convincing either. Rott was pretty bad occasionally and very forgettable, while Gedeck, a great actress in fact, was entirely wasted with stereotypical material. This was not a good watch and only the people I mentioned in the title may want to check it out. Everybody else skip it.

For many people ,Sissi is Romy Schneider,who portrayed the empress four times ,in the Marischka trilogy and in Visconti's "Ludwig" (1972) which the actress considered the true historically accurate portrait of Elisabeth.The Marischka trilogy was closer to fairy tale,avoiding all the tragic moments (Sophie's death,Solferino,Sadowa,the war and its horrors);it also flouted chronology -for instance ,Rudolph was not at the ceremony in Hungary whereas he was already a little boy.This MTV work is enjoyable,because,by and large,chronology is respected ;it must have been hard for C. Catopondi to reprise such a part ,but she managed quite well in her portrayal ,which's got something of dear Romy;David Rott,on the other hand ,if you look at the monarch's early pictures, is physically closer to young Francis- Joseph than Karl Heinz Boehm.Here,the screenwriters put the emperor in a slightly less charming light than we've been used to seeing him in ;he is self- conscious,cheated by Napoleon the third -whereas his wife knows better-;although he hated war,he waged two of them ,filling the hospitals where they gathered the crippled,the maimed,the wounded,the legless,and the armless.On the other hand ,the movie does not depict the people's poverty (Sissi hints at these women who fight against hunger,visits an orphanage ,and that's it:note the sharp contrast with Schneider's visit to the crèche ,in "Sissi Die Junge Kaiserin")All that concerns the emperor and his brother Max does not ring true;after Solferino disaster,Maximilian was very popular and Franz- Joseph did not like him that much;he did not really urge him to give up on his dream:to become a true emperor himself;he actually wanted to get rid of him ,and before he left for his doomed fate,made sure he would lose his rights and titles in Austria,a deprivation which would extend to his heirs if his wife Charlotte -who has some brief appearances in the movie-had children (which did not happen ).The two persons who tried to make Max change his mind were Sissi and mainly Archduchess Sophie (Max was her favorite child,and it shows in the movie).Some people complain that the saga should stop with the coronation ceremony in Hungary;but it is actually a smart decision:Sissi's political role and involvement in the government became slowly but inexorably nonexistent afterward;she was the official empress,but ,most of the time ,she was away from the court she always shunned because she could not stand the etiquette (in his "Ludwig",Visconti showed this vital side of the character)The movie does not pass over in silence Rudolph's "education" before Sissi showed her strong will over his upbringing;the movie does not ,however,show the worst "Knocking into shape" :"blank cartridges were fired without warning in his room to test his reactions ,an experiment which may have had disastrous effects on the Crown Prince in later life" (Alan Palmer,"twilight of the Habsburgs,the life and times of emperor FJ")It is no masterpiece ,but it's a movie which possesses considerable appeal for people who saw the mushy trilogy when they were younger.People hungry for more ,as far as the Mexican adventure is concerned ,should try and see William Dieterle's "Juarez" (1939),in which Bette Davis portrays Charlotte ,although modern studies have shown that the emperor's brother's and wife's relationship was actually extremely ambiguous.

I fully agree with the previous review by Marcin. Although the series has some qualities and is " watchable " for a viewer with an average knowledge of the KuK era and the Habsburg history, for an "advanced" viewer with background knowledge there are additional inconsistencies with the reality, some of which could easily be avoided, like ommitance of mustache/beard of the emperor: Through the whole series until its end by the coronation in Budapest (1867) the emperor Franz Joseph has no mustache/beard although his portraits and coins clearly show that he had grown the mustache already by 1855 and beard by early 1860.More annoyingly than a detail - I do not understand why the series ends in 1867/8 ? Sisi lived for 30 more years (assasinated in 1898) and many more important milestones of her life and marriage happened after 1868: Mayerling tragedy - suicide of Rudolph, her stay in Corfu, her travelling around the world etc. Was budget the reason ? To show her complete picture the series should have at least 4 - 5 parts.

Since the 1950s when the Christmas times of 1955, 1956, 1957 began and SISSI Trilogy premiered, the charming role of Romy Schneider has captivated various viewers. Romy's youthful face has been so deeply associated with the face of young Elizabeth of Austria (1837-1898) that hardly anyone could imagine a different Sissi on screen. Any remake was bound to failure from the very start because Marischka gave viewers what they wanted: a glamorous dreamlike picture with the heights of splendor and delicacy. That dreamlike picture, though sometimes considered as "kitschy," has stood a test of time as "classic." And yet, after more than 50 years, when the Christmas time 2009 began, a new SISI has premiered on ZDF, not a spectacular remake but a cure to the "kitsch" of saccharine sweetness and a challenging insight into the personality of Kaiserin Von Oesterreich. What has come out of it? Since the result has occurred ambiguous, let me first concentrate on the strong points of the movie.Cristiana Capotondi in the lead emphasizes more a modern woman than the historical figure, though both aspects are there and they are considerably manifested. We get an insight into a spontaneous personality but also a very tactful politician, a sensible woman and a brave defender of personal freedom, the wife who stands at the side of her imperial husband but who does not agree to be a marionette...as the emperor nicely puts it, she is "the only monarch in Europe who says to her husband 'You must!'" Sisi is assertive and very up-to-date. At the same time, she is a good hearted empress who visits the orphanage and lovingly says "It is you who are beautiful," she is a caring mother who considers her son's psychological health superior to military career; yet, she is not a naive young "maeddel" (girl) who runs in a night dress through the corridors of the imperial court to tell her husband unbelievable news about...pregnancy... She is an emotionally mature mother and wife who understands the needs of her husband and of her kids. And that insight, which makes it more appealing psychologically than spectacularly (which is accurate historically) is really worth appraisal! Ms Capotondi does a fine job in this film! As for Sisi's appearance, the director clearly took into consideration the famous portraits of Elizabeth, particularly the one by Franz Xaver Winterhalter but he also aimed at making the character look less melancholic and more practical. Ms Capotondi is definitely not Ms Schneider but...Ms Schneider was also not Elizabeth (the pressure she detested throughout her life and career). It is only what we, viewers, got used to and what some people still appear to do when associating Elizabeth with Ms Schneider. Therefore, by some, Ms Capotondi will never be accepted as new Sisi.As for the rest of the characters and cast, David Rott is pretty good as emperor Franz Josef: quite sympathetic and talented yet I have some doubts concerning certain moments with him. Among other cast, I found Martina Gedeck as Sophie pretty accurate considering her appearance (similar to original pictures of Sophie Wittelsbach) and dominant style of behavior. She is Sisi's strict mother-in-law who can justify anything with the rules of the imperial court of the Habsburgs. Franziska Stavjanik as Countess Esterhazy also does a memorable job in her role of a secret informer that turns into an empathetic friend. Yet, there is one case with the cast: whoever will see the film in the original (German) will mostly hear the German accent rather than the Viennese one (= the desirable one in such a movie).The film's another merit is the whole atmosphere supplied by sentimental soundtrack, wit (consider, for instance, the hilarious scene of imperial bath or a parrot saying the name of the empress during the imperial couple's incognito visit to the streets of Vienna), the authentic sets. As far as the locations are concerned, there are however, two inaccuracies: first Bad Ischl which shows no single indication of the Kaiservilla; second, St Michael's Church for the imperial wedding. As for the former, it is a serious shortcoming, as for the latter, the producers, perhaps, wanted to create a sort of reference to Marischka's SISSI (1955) where the splendid wedding scene (the final scene of the 1955 movie) was also filmed in Michaelerkirche near the Hofburg Palace, not in Augustinerkirche (Vienna) where the historical wedding of the imperial couple actually took place.Yet, I have two major complaints about the movie. The first one is the neglect of the significant aspect at the court that was "Spanische Hofzeremoniell" - Spanish court ceremony - so much promoted at the time by the Habsburgs (in this case, Marischka's 1950s classic stands out as extraordinary and very accurate while SISI remains merely laughable); the second one is the depiction of Count Andrassy and his patriotic quest. Elizabeth is showed to meet him in various unpredictable places, including Posenhofen or a ball during the carnival in Venice. The empress wearing a mask is recognized by Andrassy and walks with him in the streets of Venice at night... My goodness, what have they thought? (ambiguous, laughable fantasy...)All things considered, in order to like this film, you have to get rid of all previous expectations, interpretations, fantasies about Elizabeth of Austria and look at her from a new perspective, as a modern viewer. Indeed, there is one success of the film: SISI is a film about a 19th century woman whom the 21st century viewers will surely understand no matter if their tribute to her sounds like the Italian "E Viva La Mama!", German "Es Lebe Die Kaiserin Von Oesterreich!" or Hungarian "Elyen!" 6/10