I think this is a new genre that they're all sort of working their way through it and haven't got all the kinks worked out yet but it's a genre that works for me.

SERIOUSLY. This is what the crap Hollywood still puts out?

Easily the biggest piece of Right wing non sense propaganda I ever saw.

This movie tries so hard to be funny, yet it falls flat every time. Just another example of recycled ideas repackaged with women in an attempt to appeal to a certain audience.

***SPOILERS*** Somewhat far fetched, in just how naive those in it are, made for TV movie about these three girls in their early 20's taking a trip to the notorious San Diego Mittner Cove for spring brake where anything goes who end up getting themselves good and smashed. And in the case of pretty 22 year old 2nd grade school teacher Emma Norman, Odette Annable, video taped supposedly doing it, having wild and crazy sex, with a number of the students partying there. It's later back home in Prairie Minnesota that a tape of the action is seen on the Internet with Emma looking both drunk and high on drugs moaning and groaning on the beach with an unidentified, his head is turned from the camera, and seemingly very happy and aroused young man.In no time at all Emma's life is turned upside down losing her job as a teacher as well as having her boyfriend David the Fireman, John Baker, cut off all communications, on the phone & Internet, with her. Among Emma's other problems is her dad's business is torched and she' stalked by this degenerated who after seeing her on the net and how hot she is, and by thinking that she's easy, trying to get very friendly with her as well as getting into her jogging sweat pants. Feeling that she was set up in all this by a group of horny guys back at Mittner's Cove Emma tries to get proof that she in fact is not the girl having sex on the internet porno movie. Something that's so obvious in seeing that it's her head not her body, that's seen having sex on the video, on the tape that it can be proved by anyone not just photographic computer and video tape expert Mr. Raviphamai, Colin Mathura-Jeffree, that she traveled all the way to L.A to have him analyzed.****SPOILERS*** With no one willing to help her Emma goes on her own doing a little detective work in tracking down those who video taped her without her consent to not only bring them to justice but clear her good name as well. In the end Emma gets justice in her own way but most of all convinces herself that she was a victim not a willing participant in the mess that she got herself into. Even though she had to break the law and an apartment filled with computers video and tape splicing machines to do it.P.S The movie sadly depicts what's become so common in this computer and technical age in how easy it is to invade someone's privacy and use that information to be spread across the globe via the internet which knows no boundaries and, in those illegally using it, respects no laws.

Comments that blame the victim are exactly what the film was preaching against. No, this is no Academy Award-winning film. It didn't win any critics' award, or Sundance, or Golden Globe, but it has a point. Many people are hypocrites and they will find it difficult to find in favor of women who show any sexuality. To the poster who dismissed the girl because she took a drink from a stranger--imagine your daughter forgetting that rule for one moment--here are two quotes for you to chew on: Hell is the theological equivalent of "Boy are you gonna get it when your dad gets home!" - Jack Carlson The infliction of cruelty with a good conscience is a delight to moralists--that is why they invented hell. - Bertrand Russell

I would give this turkey 2*, because it does have the capability of enabling a viewer to recall some of those words we seldom use on a day-to-day basis, but which have a place in our vocabulary:VACUOUS - Stupid; senseless. INSIPID - Tasteless; dull. MORONIC - Foolish; stupid. VAPID - (also...) Tateless; dull.We could add several others, but these pretty-well sum-up all which is necessary to describe this flick.I caught this on a Friday mid-day, with a friend who wanted to continue viewing it more than I - but I was frankly fascinated also by its awfulness..I'd rather have Forrest Gump or Goober from Mayberry teaching a child of mine than the airhead lead actress here. Even when she supposedly was being serious in her effort and being lauded by her superiors, there wan't anything in her persona to evoke the least bit of empathy or interest - zilch! I'm sure the writers/producer/director intended her fiancé to be portrayed a "hunk" -- try "nerd" instead, and see definitions above.The guys who perpetrated the supposedly scandalous tape, and who I'm sure the director intended to be nefarious and clever, were as idiotic as the rest of the cast, about as believable, The group of guys and gals in "Porky's" portrayed characters who seemed "deep" compared with those here -- and their performances were closer those one might expect, say, from Brando, Olivier and Bette Davis by comparison.As far as the ending and all of the scenes following "spring break," who-in-the-hell could possibly give a tinker's damn??The most interesting thing I have from this film, and the only thing which provides anything worth subsequent discussion is this (and I feel provides a somewhat interesting dilemma).Which was worse? The lead actress' performance on the video tape where she was faking an orgasm for the others on vacation, or her actual performance in this opus?

When my husband makes fun of my Lifetime movie addiction, most of the time I laugh off his comments. But his mocking comments on this movie were right on target: it was really awful. I thought the plot had promise: the dangers of going wild on Spring Break trips, and how what seems fun while you're drunk can seem trashy and tawdry the next day. But instead we got a really clichéd story of a woman/girl who made some really terrible choices, then, beyond all odds, got her "revenge" in the last five minutes of the movie. What a waste of two hours. Bad acting and even worse writing, and I hated the voice-over lecture at the end. I completely agree with Kimberly's review (above), so read her review on why you should steer clear of this piece of junk.