People are voting emotionally.

It’s an especially fun movie from a director and cast who are clearly having a good time allowing themselves to let loose.

Through painfully honest and emotional moments, the movie becomes irresistibly relatable

I didn’t really have many expectations going into the movie (good or bad), but I actually really enjoyed it. I really liked the characters and the banter between them.

RAIDERS OF BUDDHIST KUNG FU is another very poor quality film from director Godfrey Ho, who seems to have taken an old-fashioned South Korean martial arts movie and spliced in his own footage featuring Gordon Liu in a role that amounts to little more than a brief cameo as a villain who goes around looking brooding. The whole production is nonsensical and largely dull, featuring a general lack of coherence and entertainment value for the fans.A lot of films made during this era seem to feature a young guy dressed up as an old master, Simon Yuen style, complete with a bedraggled grey wig, and this movie is no exception. Mike Wong is the hero of the piece, injured by villains but recovering and gunning for revenge. The film is one of those that features inserted shots of a circling hawk replaced by a very obvious dummy for the scenes in which it attacks. This is virtually unintelligible garbage.

This film has everything you need for a hilarious night indoors with your friends.Poor film quality? Cringe-worthy Kung-fu choreography? Hilarious dubbing? Awkward and disjointed dialogue? Cameraman incapable of keeping the camera still or focused on the right characters? Cliché characters including samurai and plucky child side-kick? Plucky child side-kick has a dead bird on his shoulder which is actually meant to be a live pet? Random white guy with an afro appears from a bush in the middle of a fight scene and joins in? Absolutely ridiculous and memorable ending? All of these aforementioned qualities, and more, are all available for your viewing pleasure throughout the course of this movie.To be sincere for a moment, this is an absolutely appalling film which is barely worthy of a single star. As soon as it begins, one can hardly believe that this was a genuine attempt at a serious movie. You can only reason that films back in 1980s had especially low standards. But if you do not take it seriously and simply relish the examples of pure incompetence both on the part of the actors and director, this film will have the entire room roaring with laughter.Essential viewing.8/10 - A film that simply surpasses the level of "Terrible" and transcends into the realm of "Beautiful" (marked down from 10. Regardless of how funny it is, points must be deducted simply because of how terrible it is)

The recent retitled release of this film on DVD isn't very good; they don't even seem to be using the print that was once used for release of tape, but an inferior copy.Many of the old school Hong Kong chop socky films that Americans think are just so bad they're funny, are actually rather good, once the viewer gets what it is the filmmakers themselves think they're doing, and what audience they think they are doing it for. But that is not the case here. This really is so bad it's funny. Cardboard characters portrayed by hammy actors; unconnected scenes strung together for no apparent rhyme or reason; absurd stereotypes like the slavering hunchbacked would-be rapist; dialog that seems to have been copied off a bubblegum wrapper by a scribe on acid; cheesy special effects (like the trained "hawk" that is clearly stuffed and hanging from a wire); yep, this film has it all.It must be said that fight scenes are pretty good; nonetheless, even in these one finds reason to chuckle. During a duel with staffs, the bad-guy knocks the good-guy's staff away, then steps away to boasts "At the long-staff I am the master!' Then he - throws his staff away! Heck, how dumb can a fighter get? If you have a weapon for which your opponent has no defense, the first thing you do is get rid of it?! The film has tens of little bits like that, and grand ones too. I'm sure there's a plot here, but i could never figure out what it was. best seen at three in the morning and you're suffering from insomnia and your brain's numb. Whew! from the creative team Joseph lai and Godfrey Ho, of course. Special guest star Gordon Liu, who looks like he's rehearsing for the role of Yul Brynner's corpse - a must see-to-believe, at least once.

This film was bad. I believe Elton (or is it Mike) Wong starred in it. Anyway it was the Wong that didn't have that goofy grin and looks meaner. He plays a man who is hit over the head and suffers brain damage. He recovers and gets revenge. Gordon Liu is the only one worth seeing in this film, but he doesn't get to do much. But what little he does seems to make theothers pale in comparison. Also, the film has some cheesy rubber hawk that the Wong guy controls. This film is not worth renting or buying.