Some things I liked some I did not.

Self-important, over-dramatic, uninspired.

It's a mild crowd pleaser for people who are exhausted by blockbusters.

As somebody who had not heard any of this before, it became a curious phenomenon to sit and watch a film and slowly have the realities begin to click into place.

i have to say, the koreans know how to make a good movie. i think that for every 10 i watch maybe only 2 are bad and the rest are all very good. this particular movie was no exception. it was a very well made movie with a very good cast. the girl that plays the missing little sister is probably one of the hottest acting commodities in Korea right now. she is a great actress already at such a young age. there's at least 2 other movies that she was the main lead that i can recall and both were even better than this( sunny and hansel&gretel ). she could have won awards for either one of those movies.hmmm..., what genre to put this movie in? it has got elements of religious fanaticism, supernatural elements, eastern Asian mysticism, a decent detective and mystery story...oh well, who cares...it is just a good movie that is all. the movie was paced fairly well and the story was not too convoluted. it wasn't too scary or creepy to me like some reviewers have said, although i think it will scare some people.i personally enjoy these types of movies with east-Asian mysticism, Christian fanatics and supernatural elements and it was a fairly entertaining movie and i always wanted to find out what was going to happen next.

I saw this film at the Tribeca film festival and it really knocked my socks off. Its a slowly building film that messes with your head, isn't gory and manages to through in notions of religious faith. It made me and the audience I saw it with jump several times (even when we saw it coming). Its a masterpiece of its kind. And the best of the 8 films I've seen so far at the Tribeca Film Festival.The plot has a college girl go home because something has happened to her sister. When she gets home she finds her sister missing and her mother possessed by an even stronger Christian belief. As she pleads with the police to help find her sister people in her apartment complex begin dying, all are some how connected to her sister.I know this film isn't going to please people who need blood and guts and ooze to be scared. There are no axe wielding maniacs or typical things one associates with modern horror. Instead we have a film that shows a world askew and builds menace from that. Sure there are shocks and death, but at the same time they are subtly done, look away and you'll miss an eye that moves exactly the way eyes can't, or a mouth that's a little too wide.I love that this film has ideas in its head beyond just being scary. This is a film that is very much rooted in the worlds of Christianity, atheism and shamanism. It's a film that relies on the struggles of the three points of view to create a very tense atmosphere. Ultimately the film is not so much a horror film as a meditation on the nature of faith.For one of the few times since Silence of the Lambs I saw a horror movie with an audience that was wound up tight as a drum. Only one time, after a very strange passage was there any sort of "unintentional laughter" which seemed from what I could hear to come from unease at what some people were experiencing. I don't know when was the last time that I jumped as many times as I did here. to be certain I could see the jumps coming but I still leapt out of my seat.If there are any flaws its that toward the end there a couple of small moments where things happen that aren't explained, why is the time of death questioned? (I'm guessing an autopsy report but its not spelled out). The very end of the film also doesn't have an ending that is completely satisfying, the tension isn't released but rather dissipates (on the other hand if you see the film as not just a horror film it makes more sense.) Still this film knocked my socks off. I stared at the screen wanting to know what was coming and dreading the possibilities.This is a must see film for those who don't need the blood and the body parts.

The previous reviewer is one of those guys that I disagree with most of the time. "Faithless Hell" (aka "Possessed", aka "Living Death") (2009) is a shining example, because it's difficult to comprehend how someone could bash this as being a "bad" horror movie.First of all, the acting and camera-work are both top notch, which automatically raises "Faithless Hell" to a respectable level that should disqualify any assertions that it is somehow poorly made. The performance of the lead actress is no less than fantastic, and is most definitely deserving of a "2009 Best Actress In Horror" nomination (if there was one) alongside OK-bin Kim who gave us a blistering performance in "Thirst" (2009). Sang-Mi Nam plays the concerned elder sister in the kind of professional, restrained manner that is sorely lacking in genre films from the west. The supporting cast also does an admirable job. You really can't ask for much more than this in terms of acting quality. It's first rate.I find that those who dislike South Korean horror tend to go in with the same expectations as when they watch modern Hollywood or European horror movies, which is a major problem considering the massive chasm of differences between the industries. For example, Hollywood horror will frequently resort to jump scares and loud noises in overly repetitive ways, but you're not going to get this kind of talentless hackery in "Faithless Hell." I can remember only one jump scare in the entire film (near the beginning). Consequently, viewers who come out of this aggravated that "Not once did I jump in my seat" really have no idea what to look for in a slow-burning horror film such as this. "Faithless Hell" does an exquisite job at building an interesting, occultish mystery surrounding the disappearance of a young girl while peppering in some cool nightmarish visions along the way.And that brings us to another issue, the alleged "confusing" nature of this film. Let me tell you this: "Faithless Hell" is a very straight-forward movie because the narrative is shown (and at times even explained) clearly to the viewer with little in terms of ambiguity. BRIEF SPOILER The crane bite, the leg-scratching scene, and the potato sack scene were all nightmarish visions brought about by the Crane Spirit as it attempts to make its transition from the dead girl to her older sister. There are also a number of appearances by crane footprints (talismans, foggy windows, etc.) for emphasis, and the very end where the detective's child becomes miraculously healthy acts as confirmation that the possession is complete. END BRIEF SPOILER Much of this is explained by one the characters at the police station, so there shouldn't be much confusion here at all. Sure, the visions themselves are kinda freaky and incomprehensible, but they only occupy a few minutes of running time and serve a purpose outside of narrative drive – they provide the visuals that communicate the effects of the Crane Spirit on the lead protagonist.With regards to the relationships between the protagonists, it's underscored and subtly expressed through day-to-day interaction. It's obvious that the friction between the lead protagonist and her mother is due to the mother's fanaticism, and it's obvious that the lead protagonist is open to non-fanatical forms of religion. There's nothing confusing about this relationship, and "Faithless Hell" is under no obligation to offer a "protest against religious fanaticism" or "speak in favor of faith." In fact, I personally find it much more interesting and realistic when such themes are explored but not fully answered or pushed by the filmmakers.As I've mentioned before in my IMDb comments – especially the one for Kiyoshi Kurosawa's "Retribution" (2006) – audiences really need to start using their brain cells while watching Asian horror movies. Almost none of them are as confusing as reviewers make them out to be. If you want a confusing Asian horror film, watch "Spider Forest" (2004) or "Marebito" (2004). I'll give you those, but "Faithless Hell" is not even remotely close to being confusing.In terms of industry trends, South Korean horror has been solid from 2008-2010. "Missing" (2009) and "Blood Pledge" (2009) were both mediocre, "G.P. 506" (2008) was dreadfully boring, and "Death Bell" (2008) was frankly incompetent. Fortunately, we have "I Saw the Devil" (2010), "Faithless Hell" (2009), "Thirst" (2009), "Midnight F.M." (2010), "Yoga Institute" (2009), "Chaw" (2009), "Bedevilled" (2010), and "Loner" (2008) to enjoy.

First off there is one particular nasty scene that served no other purpose than to shock the viewer (And by nasty I mean disgusting not gruesome). While I have no problems with using such methods I do think it has to build up to something. Sadly there is no real climax or wtf moment to speak of. Well,there is one little scene that truly belongs to the genre,only it comes far too late. And when this scene plays out you just don't care anymore. Like many Korean horror movies this one is slow and very confusing. And it is maybe somewhat commendable that this director tries to do something new. But would it have hurt to put in some decent scares. Not once did I jump from my seat. Not that it is always required. But in this case much needed since the suspense is seriously lacking. There is a drama element that could have been used more to provide more impact. The relationship between the mother and the daughter(s) seems to be at the core of the few events that are played out. The background on this relationship is so minimal that it made it real hard for me to care for these persons. (I sense some sort of protest against Religious fanaticism. But on the other hand it also speaks in favor of faith.What do you mean confusing?) Had the director put in more depth into the main characters then maybe all of it would have made much more sense. "Living Death" doesn't offer anything else to redeem itself. So why invest time in this movie.Edit:People who judge others based on one written review and think to know what kind of person it is because he expressed his dislike for a movie they liked, need to take a look at themselves.Especially when is implied that braincells aren't used.Funny how this always applies to the so called art house titles and festival movies that are pretentious and ambiguous on purpose so that it can be interpreted in many ways.In some cases that surely could be a positive thing since it makes you think.Or it could be perceived as a bad thing since it masks the fact that the director could not decide or be bothered to give a solution.It all comes down to the interpretation of the viewer or the willingness of the viewer for that interpretation.I surely can appreciate subtleness in certain genres.But that does depend on the execution and the style it is presented in.If some of the story or dialogue is lost on the viewer one does have to ask whether this is because of the inability from the viewer to comprehend or that the director fails to tell the story adequately.In my opinion a brilliant film maker is someone who knows how to deliver the message to every man.It's not that difficult to be vague even when they are under the impression it is obvious.People like me who deal with real life as real as it can get don't need to look for that kind of substance in books or movies.For me movies are pure escapism.That doesn't mean I don't appreciate it if a movie makes you think.I applaud it providing it is something I can relate to.But for each person this is different of course.This is only an excerpt of the million thoughts I have.But for the sake of humanity I will save those for myself.Why bother you with this particular thought then?To make it clear that each opinion is valid and that one's intelligence can't be measured based on this one opinion. Back to the movie. In my opinion Living Death doesn't offer enough for me to like it wholeheartedly.It did not impress me as it did with others on this board.I saw some elements like the mother daughter relationship that needed exploring.Some people do need more to be convinced especially when it is branded a horror movie.There are some conventions you can't escape from when it comes to horror.In that aspect it doesn't matter if we are talking about Hollywood type horror or Asian Horror.I sometimes favour Asian Horror because it usually knows how to build up tension and suspense in subtle ways.Living Death fails to do that.Here endeth the sermon!