Memorable, crazy movie

Best movie of this year hands down!

It's entirely possible that sending the audience out feeling lousy was intentional

It's the kind of movie you'll want to see a second time with someone who hasn't seen it yet, to remember what it was like to watch it for the first time.

This felt like a cross between 'Need for Speed' and 'Fast and the Furious' with a touch of 'The Transporter' thrown in the mix. It was loaded with great music, and I absolutely loved the cars. The acting and dialogue was very cheesy, though, but the actors were likable enough. It was much better than 'Need for Speed', but not nearly as good as the first 'Fast and the Furious'. It seemed more aimed at a teenage demographic and not really for a mature audience. There were also way too many characters involved who did not really have roles. I found Clemens Schick rather good as Max Klemp. The action sequences were great, as well.

Classic old school plot. Classic getaway. Classic cars. Classic chases but with beautiful shots of tight mountain roads. Pretty girls (only two of them). Nice soundtrack.The makers of this movie failed to add depth to the main characters, because they shouldn't have even tried. The movie has enough pretty cars, two(yes, only two) pretty girls, decent pace which was watered down with shallow love stories. For some reason it gives the feeling that they cannot fail which spoils the thrill: "How are they gonna make it now!?". Yes, acting was cheesy, but convincing enough so you can bare it before the next chase. Clint Eastwood's son was so stiff, that I was expecting him to spit tobacco and to get on the horse at any moment now. The good thing - every single stunt was very real. No zero gravity, no "turn off the physics for a while" moments. Engine roar, rubber and grip. I would prefer this one before any of the last FF movies.

This movie reminds me the French "Taxi" movie series (from Luc Besson): bad action scenes, bad acting, bad script, bad camera work.... I don't know how Scott Eastwood got involved in this movie. Because he can have a pretty good acting career like his father by selecting better projects.Ana De Armas is not good either (before her big break in Blade Runner 2049). Surely because of the crappy and unoriginal script.And I don't know how this movie got funded. Surely it can be a nice TV movie, so forgettable.

A lot has been covered by other reviewers so I'll just add the two things that bothered me the most.You can't go and steal extremely rare cars. A random Ferrari; sure you can steal it and sell it in another country. But every Ferrari 250 GTO is numbered and known about. You can't just go and steal Nick Mason's 250 GTO and sell it to someone random. Interpol will be on you in no time.Also, was Kemp a bad guy or a good guy? Did he kill the pilot? Did Andrew just think that was ay-okay? And how did they end up with the GTO in the end? Steal it from the guy that played along? Very confusing.