This Movie Can Only Be Described With One Word.

Strong and Moving!

Blistering performances.

The plot isn't so bad, but the pace of storytelling is too slow which makes people bored. Certain moments are so obvious and unnecessary for the main plot. I would've fast-forwarded those moments if it was an online streaming. The ending looks like implying a sequel, not sure if this movie will get one

This is not a good movie. It has an awful ending and an awful story line. The original Night of the living dead from 1968 is a good movie. The first remake of Night of the living dead from 1990 is also a good movie. But this second remake of the Night of the living dead is not very good. The sequel to Night of the living dead Dawn of the Dead (1978) is a very good movie. The third movie Day of the Dead (1985) is also a good movie. The fourth movie Land of the dead is also a good movie. But not this movie. 3.2 is overrating it. This a bad movie. Do not waste your time. And do not waste your money. This is a very bad remake.

Brilliantly directed by Jeff Broadstreet and with a screenplay by the visionary George Romero himself, this features a magnificent utilization of 3D and the undead have never been more intensely depicted. This is nothing less than a truly majestic entry in the Dead Canon and no one who sees this will ever forget the haunting imagery of this film. The legendary Sid Haig gives a superb performance and the entire cast is uniformly excellent. This is not a remake but a re-imagining of the original groundbreaking masterpiece and it is a very lovely homage to that black and white landmark. Those who have studied the 1968 motion picture and hold that film sacred will find this 3D movie a stunning, incredibly exquisite tribute to mother ship film. The casual audience member will simply be astonished by the horror, the suspense, and overwhelming apocalyptic intensity that is Night of the Living Dead 3D.

When I saw John Russo's raping of Night of the Living dead, laughingly released as the 30th Anniversary edition, I sat back, shook my head, took the VHS out of my machine and tossed it in a corner thinking, "No one can possibly screw up what is a classic film ever again." Wow, was I wrong. I saw this horrendous abortion of a film in 2-D, since it was released to a movie theater within 500 miles of where I live. Luckily for any theater, since I would certainly have demanded my money back. This was a horrid, terrible, stupid movie. How can anyone sit around and go "Yeah, we made a winner here." This, along with Dawn of the Dead 2: Contagium and Day of the Dead (2008), should all be taken, piled up and burned, the better that no one ever remembers them ever. They should be erased from the collective memory of humanity, yes they are that bad. Acting, bad. Story (Laughable) Bad. SFX. Bad. Even the momentary nudity from an obviously enhanced woman was bad. Just do yourself a favor. Watch the original or the 1990 remake and avoid all this garbage. Your brain will thank you.

This movie was absolutely terrible. Bad acting, bad special effects, ridiculous uninspired writing, truly an insult to legacy of Romero in every way.Not much more to be said, an embarrassing effort not even worthy of scifi channel status.Do yourself a favor and pass this weak effort by. I diddn't even want to finish it, but I did and I can honestly say it never gets any better.The only way to make this enjoyable would be to give it the Mystery Science Theater treatment, then it would be tolerable. No one in this movie was even slightly believable and had the combined acting depth of a puddle, INCLUDING their poster boy.