Touches You

I wanted to but couldn't!

Fantastic!

This is a must-see and one of the best documentaries - and films - of this year.

I would have loved to have given this movie a 9 or 10, but couldn't. First, the wonderful elements of this movie (two categories), from lesser to greater: 1. Four great roles, with four great actors, doing wonderful work: Jason Sudeikis, Jennifer Aniston, Timothy Olyphant, and Julia Roberts, all doing some wonderful work in their characters' roles, whenever the script and plot will allow them to do so; 2. The fantastic, real-life themes this movie addresses: grieving for a deceased spouse who was greatly loved, grieving over a marriage now in divorce, the pain of rejection (in several characters in several ways), the pain of an ex-spouse's remarriage, being a single dad, being a single mom, conflicted feelings about an ex's new spouse, struggles with the unfairness of life, experiencing lack of appreciation from one's kids, insecurities that come with being adopted, deep regret over giving a child up for adoption, the hardship of divorce and the post-divorce relationship, and the fear of being rejected a second time by meeting one's biological parent(s). Wow: what a list. And all these are done well and mostly very honestly--really, really, with high quality. This is real-life stuff--stuff of real pain and sadness--and this movie nearly "knocks it out of the park" on these things, both in plot and acting. However, the plot fails many times these themes and does not allow these actors to bring the themes to the great, cathartic end they should have had. That said, there's another 50% of the movie that deals with other characters, unsupported changes-of-heart and renewed relationships, and plot-lines (huge cast; many stories going on at once, and that's OK) that I considered "throw-away." The story line of worth is that with the four characters I've named. 20% of the movie had me rolling my eyes, but the good parts, the good acting, the good lines, the real-life themes with which the movie deals make that WELL worth it, and push an otherwise "4" movie all the way to a "7" in my book. I almost gave it an "8." The movie's downfall is from its lack of awareness of what it is--the writer and director (mostly writer) didn't know if he/she was making a comedy, a tragedy, or a drama of mixed measures of hope. The movie is the latter two, but attempts comedy, with stupid characters (yes, I'm looking at you, sisters' parents, Dr., and Dr.'s mom). Fortunately, these things don't get in the way too much of the good half of the movie and plot-ilnes. Were the bad-half of the movie/characters removed, there would have been room (time) to develop the good half 40% more. This is going on my list of great movies that show the value of marriage and the hurt of broken relationships therein. Incidentally, Jason Sudeikis's "Hall Pass" not only has a similar feel, but also a good message in the same direction.

The comedy wasn't funny, the drama and the resolutions were all predictable, and most of the performances made me feel uncomfortable. Not sure who owed who a favor, but this should have never been a feature film. It's basically an average Lifetime movie, but gets a slight bump only because of Jennifer Aniston, who always pulls off these safe familiar roles with some spark and even some depth, but that isnt enough to help save an otherwise horribly predictable and flat script.

Fist clue: Jen Aniston stars in it which means the movie will be PURE CRAP.Second clue: Oh dear, Jason Sudeikis also stars in it, how coincidental, Jen and him are former colleagues from We're the Millers and Horrible Bosses. Smells like deja vu.Kate Hudson is cool but there is no proof of chemistry between her and her husband played by Aasif Mandvi, who can't act well enough to sell a happy marriage.Then Julia Roberts' scenes last less than 10 minutes during the whole movie, so explain why-why-oh my god why she was on the movie poster and not Sarah Chalke??!! Plus her character is as cold as her in real life. You know what Julia, we've seen Notting Hill in 1999, we've moved on.The only characters that kept me going were the least famous but the most gifted: Jack Whitehall as Zack and Margo Martindale as Flo.To sum up, wait until your local TV shows it, don't even bother paying for it.Not.worth.a.single.penny

I actually enjoyed this movie more than some of the other similar Gary Marshall ensemble comedies. The cast is as likable as any you can get together in a movie and the scenarios are quite funny.Shay Mitchell of PLL is a scene stealer as younger second wife and she can hold her own in both looks and acting ability with the A list cast. Jennifer Aniston looks comfortably older as divorcée first wife. The funny situation is Kate Hudson's character hiding her Indian husband from her racist white trash parents. Brit Robertson never seems to look older than a teenager plays a woman with commitment issues. Julia Roberts looks deliberately I think a bit garish as a home shopping queen.Don't understand why people criticized this movie so badly. It's actually okay.