Watch something else. There are very few redeeming qualities to this film.

Excellent and certainly provocative... If nothing else, the film is a real conversation starter.

Amazing worth wacthing. So good. Biased but well made with many good points.

One of the most extraordinary films you will see this year. Take that as you want.

While this documentary is certainly not what's going to impress nor interest the people of today, for the time it was made this is pretty good. The photography, as Snow Leopard has pointed out, is simply beautiful and well-done, and practically every scene in here has a pan of the camera to capture more. The views are also good. Sometimes the scenes are just beautiful, and other times they are historic. It doesn't matter. Today, it might not be of much interest to anyone but historians or film buffs, but for the time the people in France (it was produced by Pathe Freres despite being made by a German) must have found it interesting to see sights from across the world. I am not sure if IMDb's year is right or not--Kino's "The Movies Begin" DVD set claims it was shot in 1908. In any case it's impressive for either date. (Note: Note that lots of the people featured here stare stupidly at the camera, curious what it's doing there. They knew nothing of filmmaking, and weren't used to people filming them).

Winter Moscow one of the most finest seats on the Earth, as well as Russia, It is not dependent, in what to year it removed also who removed, whether it be Russian The person or people foreign. And nevertheless only to Russian heart It is allowed to touch this captivating beauty. As the Ampere-second has written. Пушкин.:... Moscow as is a lot of in this sound // For heart of Russian Has merged! // As it is a lot of in it has responded! Though presently many think Itself great photographers or directors, artists, which ostensibly It is possible to something to present under new ' angle ' and to receive new ' a masterpiece '. But in it there is no sincerity, talent and feeling. I very much ask, if who Wishes to embody and show Moscow on the staff, on a film, on a canvas, Study to it, even look ' Moscow under a snow ' (1909).

This very interesting and sometimes beautiful collection of Moscow winter scenes has excellent photography, with a very well-chosen assortment of settings, and it has also been well-preserved over the years. The sights range from panoramic views of majestic buildings, to busy street scenes, to placid residential settings. The camera work could not have been much better, and it does a good job of making you feel as if you were there as an observer. With its importance and its long history, Moscow has an impressive array of public and governmental buildings that few cities can match, and this is brought out well here. Then too, seeing the city when everything is covered with snow seems particularly appropriate.This kind of filmed record of a distant place and time makes very interesting viewing when it is done well. It gives you a chance to see different sights and ways of living, but if you watch perceptively, you can also see how similar the essentials of daily life really are across time and place. There is a nicely done view of a street scene that goes on for some time, showing crowds scurrying along, and vehicles dashing back-and-forth. To be sure, the vehicles are horse-drawn, and no doubt there were many items in those stores that we would not find in our homes now, but the nature of the activity is still a familiar feature of any city. Then also, some of the scenes of residential areas could almost have been taken in a recent Midwestern winter. No doubt, different viewers will have different impressions, but in any case this is a nicely done feature that provides interesting sights worth seeing and thinking about.

Run segment 4 first, then segment 1 (the first half, up to where the column of soldiers passes the broken bell) and it could almost be the introduction to a James Bond spy thriller. Didja notice in segment 2 (just after the mushroom market scene) that even in those days there were both hams and people who were camera-shy?