It's fun, it's light, [but] it has a hard time when its tries to get heavy.

The joyful confection is coated in a sparkly gloss, bright enough to gleam from the darkest, most cynical corners.

One of the film's great tricks is that, for a time, you think it will go down a rabbit hole of unrealistic glorification.

It's simply great fun, a winsome film and an occasionally over-the-top luxury fantasy that never flags.

This is one of those movies where the actors all seem to have known it was not gonna turn out well while making it. The downside of an excellent cast of veteran actors is that you have seen them in other movies wherein they have been great, so you tend to compare those performances with the flat performances in "Montana Belle" and find this film doubly disappointing.Much of the action consists of actors riding fast on horses in long scenery shots, but all they are doing is just riding horses, not really doing anything. On the plus side, Jane Russell does some musical numbers displaying real talent and allure, and in these numbers her work is impressive.Overall, as I watched it I was thinking "wake me up when either (1)the actors and director wake up, or (2)when its over". The only reason I can think of to explain the poor results in this movie is that maybe it was extensively and badly re-edited, making it choppy and slightly disjointed at times. The overall structure of bad guys fighting another group of bad guys, and almost everybody is mean, seems to be a structure that leads to a lack of plot tension in this case.So I wouldn't recommend "Montana Belle".

Montana Belle - 1952Considering the cast and crew involved, I was very surprised just how bad this film was. We have Jane Russell, Forrest Tucker, Scott Brady, Ray Teal, George Brent, Andy Devine, John Litel and Jack Lambert in front of the camera. With the normally competent Alan Dwan and Jack Marta behind the camera, I was expecting a much better product.It is a real mishmash about Belle Starr running with the Dalton gang. It starts out silly and just gets worse as it goes. The cast just looks downright embarrassed. The actors do their best but the very silly story leaves them little room to shine. Jack Lambert as a Indian at least gave me a few chuckles.The film was shot in 1948 by Republic Pictures and shelved by them. That should have warned me right there. Four years later RKO bought it and gave it a release. They should of burned it.There are a few nice outdoor shots by veteran cinematographer, Marta. Marta did much better work on, FLYING TIGERS, THE PLUNDERERS, RIDE THE MAN DOWN, DUEL AT APACHE WELLS and CAT BALLOU.

Jane Russell, in a modest performance, is cast as the West's most notorious female outlaw, a role previously played on screen by Gene Tierney in "Belle Starr" in 1941 and by Isabel Jewell in "Badman's Territory" in 1946... Director Allan Dwan could not take any interest into the unworthy storyline or the determinedly pedestrian cast... In addition, the harsh colors are no asset to the proceedings...Belle Starr (Russell), an outlaw's widow has a misunderstanding with Scott Brady and the three outlaw Dalton Brothers... She joins with Forrest Tucker and Jack Lambert in a holdup rampage, gaining an even more unpleasant reputation... Later she returns to her old favorite place of resort disguised sufficiently so that no one recognizes her...Because gambler-saloonkeeper George Brent has $50,000 in funds that Jane is longing to gain, she persuades him to take her as a partner at his saloon... As the new presiding mistress of the establishment, Jane finds time to sing "The Gilded Lily" and to understand that Brent is basically a good guy after all, even though he is determined on bringing the Dalton gang and Belle Starr to justice...

Jane Russell plays a (very) fictionalized Belle Starr. (Going off contemporary photographs the real Belle Starr looked closer to Ernest Borgnine), also Jane gets away with being disguised as a man during a holdup!! You can see we are not talking reality here.Originally filmed in color, most prints now available are black and white. Jane does a couple of not bad (and rather racy) musical numbers that are a little out of place and appeared to have filmed at a different time. It seems as though cuts may have been as the plot gets a little muddled sometimes and now and again we get the impression we are entering scenes in progress.After completion this movie was held up for a few years before distribution, which is usually a bad sign. In this case though it seems no worse than many of the second string westerns produced in the forties.Okay with popcorn and if you're in the right mood.