The performances transcend the film's tropes, grounding it in characters that feel more complete than this subgenre often produces.

The film was still a fun one that will make you laugh and have you leaving the theater feeling like you just stole something valuable and got away with it.

The best films of this genre always show a path and provide a takeaway for being a better person.

There is, somehow, an interesting story here, as well as some good acting. There are also some good scenes

A bowl of milk with cereal letters showing the names of the filmmakers opens this documentary about milk. It begins with the filmmaker Sebastian Howard describing milk how it was seen in his early days, a perfect food that can satisfy both thirst and hunger at the same time, and apparently everyone agreed it was good for us. But is it? That seems to be the premise of this documentary. The filmmaker then goes to the streets, asking some "ordinary" folks about their opinions of milk. Most people seem to be brainwashed to believe that milk is a super food! A wholesome food that is vital for our bone health! This part also contain the most stupid (and probably the funniest) comment in this documentary, "what else are you going to drink if you're not drinking milk?" - Random dude on the street.A bunch of farmers are interviewed. They spit out claims about studies showing how wonderful milk is. I would think twice about trusting any person saying that his/her product is healthy for you. I especially like a quote from one of the farmers, saying that dairy products are great nutritious foods but also admits that he may be biased because he actually does work with dairy production. I concur. There are however several so called experts being interviewed. Some of them are convinced that milk is great food, some are sure that it is quite the opposite, deadly poison. I personally think in the question if milk is healthy for you or not is answered in one quote from the film, "in many of these controversies the truth is always somewhere in the middle".There are two people I really dislike. One of them is Robert Cohen, writer of the book "Milk: The deadly Poison". This anti-milk guy wearing various pro-vegan/vegetarian shirts pop-up now and then with the most ludicrous remarks that almost makes me want to run to the closest supermarket and devour some milk. The other one is Michael Schmidt, a raw milk producer, he describes milk as liquid love, seeing milk as something not only healthy, but even holy or religious full of love. If milk is liquid love, then sperm or vaginal juice must be the healthiest most loving liquid ever! Where can I buy a bottle!? While Robert gives vegans a bad rep, this guy makes me wanna quit consuming dairy products altogether. I guess the filmmaker chose to have these two gentlemen in his documentary to show that there are stupid people on both sides.I really liked the montages in the film, short clips with just one statement from everyone being interviewed contradicting each other with dramatic background music. The last montage ends with a glass being filled with milk, eventually pouring over. This could represent the feeling of all the contradicting statements going over our heads. A good way to show how controversial the belief of milk really is.This documentary is OK, not very good, nor really bad. It is very unbiased, which I think is nice and refreshing considering that most documentaries usually are extremely one-sided. Because of that the documentary may however make you feel even more confused about milk than you were before the film, just like the filmmaker himself seems to be in the end. I did miss some more animations with stats from studies. And there might have been too many interviews with farmers, considering that we are mostly talking about if it is healthy for us or not. But definitely worth the watch if the controversy of milk interest you.

This movie creates a false sense of being presented in an unbiased way. Hearing "both sides" (namely scientist and farmers) is not really the way to go about this. In one of the voice-over clips, the interviewer mentioned that there was a lot of disagreement about the data which is found in research. To me, this indicates that there is data on the subject available. This data gets very little viewing time. The only counter arguments for milk being good for you is made by non-scientist.It's a nice try and it was interesting, but the interviewer talked to the wrong people to answer the question he proposed at the beginning of the film.

According to the narrative, Sebastian Howard was confused about whether or not milk is supposed to be good for humans. He then set out on a two-year journey to find the answer. He interviews industry veterans, food scientists, dietitians, proponents of veganism, and more in his heartfelt search for the truth. Now, I don't know for sure how representative this narrative is to the man's real motives, but I believe it. Why? Because at the end, he admits to being just as confused as he was when he started. He advocates that people look into the matter themselves and interpret the data as best they can. I can't remember the last time I've seen such an unbiased documentary!True, I don't tend to trust the anti-milk scientists all that much (they interview the guy behind "The China Study," a book which is pretty much useless, for instance). That's hardly the point, though. The most prominent people on all sides of the debate (pro milk, anti milk, pro raw, pro pasteurized) are given their time, and it's our job to judge their credibility.Hopefully, in a few years we'll have more iron-clad scientific data on the subject. Until then, this documentary is a good place to start when looking into the subject.

This is a pretty unbiased film, unless you have even a basic knowledge of science. I would have like to hear arguments against milk based on real threats to our health (if there are any - this film never has any), but the film interviews complete Wal-mart scientists who advocate the status quo (vegan, low fat) that has been found time and again to be killing us. One actually advocates AGAINST protein. So ridiculous it's funny. The funniest part is that the anti-milk scientists are rail thin, no muscle mass yet fat, very unhealthy looking people. They don't help their own argument at all. I was hoping to get some facts, but all you get are infomercial scientists promoting dead science.