Very very predictable, including the post credit scene !!!

The film may be flawed, but its message is not.

This movie feels like it was made purely to piss off people who want good shows

It's a good bad... and worth a popcorn matinée. While it's easy to lament what could have been...

"Marilyn Monroe: The Final Days." Sounds like something that should be on some tabloid TV show, one of those morbid sumps that blame everything on child abuse and are pregnant with lines like, "Little did she know, tragedy lay just around the corner." It's actually better than that. It's not just a roll in the hay with Schadenfreude. Instead it's an interesting, sometimes funny, and reasonably objective look at Marilyn Monroe's personality and illness, the character of those who surrounded her, and the dynamics of the movie business at Twentieth-Century Fox.Monroe's childhood was exceptional in several ways -- bad ways -- a father who deserted the family and a mother who wound up in a psychiatric facility. Monroe herself had several miscarriages but always wanted to have children herself. It's probably by the seasonable interposition of a gracious Providence that she was unable to do so. There's a high genetic loading on schizophrenia.What's surprising in looking at the photos from her youth is that she was not particularly attractive. She was rather plump, puffy, and ordinary in appearance. Even at the age of twenty, she was perfectly normal except for a mane of frizzly hair. Her later glamorized beauty is a monument to studio craftsmanship.Much of the film deals with the problems she had making her last attempt at a movie, "Something's Got To Give," with Dean Martin and Cyd Charisse. Of course her unreliability was already legendary but the director, George Cukor, became worried as the shoot fell farther and farther behind, costing the studio a fortune with every day missed, money they couldn't afford to lose after the four-hour and three minute egg, "Cleopatra." She complained of cold, fevers, sinusitis, and was pounding barbiturates. Cukor shot around her, filmed all the scenes that didn't require her presence, but when Monroe took off -- still claiming illness -- to attend President John F. Kennedy's gala birthday party and performed before the crowd, the consensus was that she was plagues less by illness and more by self indulgence.It didn't help that on the few days she was available, she constantly looked to her acting coach, Paula Strassberg, for approval, without which she would demand a retake. Cukor was edged out. And Strassberg was on a five-thousand-dollar a week salary from Monroe. Nobody liked Strassberg who, regardless of the source, comes across as an expensive parasite. Her psychiatrist also claimed he could get Monroe to do whatever he wanted. We aren't informed what he was paid.After a month of shooting, the film was one million dollars over budget. Monroe had worked only thirteen out of thirty production days, and she was officially fired, her career finished at the age of thirty-six.There were photoshoots and an attempt to kick start "Something's Got To Give" but it didn't help her. She died of an overdose of seconal and other substances.Most of the talking heads are reasonable in their comments. Of course, nobody says, "I wish I'd done something differently." Her personal doc, with fashionably swept back gray hair, disclaims all responsibility. And we don't have to listen to much pop psychology, although there are the usual references to "the lost little girl inside her." The last twenty minutes or so present the updated and refurbished existing footage of the original shoot. The clips are ordered along the lines of the plot and suggest that if the movie had been finished it wouldn't have been bad, although it lacks the élan of the original, "My Favorite Wife."

The events surrounding the sad, trouble-plagued 1962 production of Marilyn Monroe's last (and unfinished) film "Something's Got To Give" are covered in this thoughtful and reasonably balanced documentary. Regardless of whether or not the viewer is a Monroe fan- or is particularly interested in Hollywood lore- there's an undeniable pull to this offering, not unlike the interest one would experience upon learning of unearthed, previously unknown recordings by a favorite long-deceased singer. This is a rare all-too-brief glimpse of what might have been.No one denies Monroe was a troubled individual and a difficult actress, and the frustrations of working with her were academic long before she signed to do this film. 20th Century Fox, her home studio for which she was making the film, and the film's reluctant director George Cukor, knew all too well what to expect (and what not to expect) from her. The documentary does a good job of detailing the dire financial situation Fox was in at the time, and how this served to put undue pressure on the production. Almost bankrupt due to the huge cost overruns and delays on their colossal epic "Cleopatra" (in it's third year of production by '62), the studio desperately needed a hit, and they needed it fast. But "Something's Got To Give" wouldn't be it.The basis for this documentary stems from the painstaking restoration of the long-forgotten reels from the film that narrator James Coburn states totaled nine hours of footage. An edited "reconstruction" of "Something's Got To Give" comprises the final part of this feature, which is also its most sadly poignant. We settle into watch what amounts to a typical piece of early-1960's harmless fluff, at times clever and witty with some good comic chops. Aside from a scene where Dean Martin's character seems surprisingly unsurprised to see his "dead" wife (indicating the absence of an earlier scene), the film moves along fairly smoothly. Lulled (as I was) into thinking that nine hours of footage is certainly enough from which to extract a coherent complete film, everything suddenly comes to an unexpected end as an off-camera Cukor says "cut!", and all too soon, there's nothing more to see. The film's reconstruction runs for only about 37 minutes, despite the fact that practically all scenes where Monroe's presence wasn't required made it onto film, as the studio worked around her frequent absences. But having continued the reconstructed film without crucial missing scenes involving Monroe would have been somewhat pointless. Fox would remake the movie with a different cast in 1963, entitled "Move Over, Darling" which would give the viewer a reasonable idea of what "Something..." might have looked like had it ever reached the screen. What precious little usable footage we saw of Monroe in the first segments of this feature is apparently all there was. This is part of what makes "Marilyn- The Final Days" so oddly compelling.

'Marilyn Monroe: The Final Days' is a documentary about Marilyn Monroe's last days, telling a little bit of her life and why the movie 'Something's Gotta to Give'' never was finished: Marilyn died in the middle of the production, just after she got her contract back with Fox.(She was fired, since she was never coming to the Studios. The few times she came, she was always very late) Showing her problems with depression, and mixing alcohol with pills (She was addicted to both of them),Marilyn was having emotional collapses, needing to take sessions with her shrink and doctors everyday,as well working under pressure. In this DVD we can see many interviews with people who knew her or was with her during the movie's production, and telling what was happening at that time.Highly recommended for Marilyn's fans.

"Marilyn Monroe: The Final Days" is an interesting look at the filming of the American icon's final and unfinished film. As a documentary, it lacks in several areas (an example - director George Cuckor is said to be angry at Monroe's frequent inability to work, but nothing is said about their on set relationship), but it includes much rare footage of Monroe and a 37-minute recreation of the film using what was shot before Monroe tragically died and the footage vaulted. It is this footage that makes "Marilyn Monroe: The Final Days" worthwhile.