Sadly Over-hyped

It really made me laugh, but for some moments I was tearing up because I could relate so much.

Great story, amazing characters, superb action, enthralling cinematography. Yes, this is something I am glad I spent money on.

One of the worst ways to make a cult movie is to set out to make a cult movie.

Van Beuren cartoons are extremely variable, especially in the number of gags and whether the absurdist humour shines through enough (sometimes it does, other times it doesn't), but are strangely interesting. Although they are often poorly animated with barely existent stories and less than compelling lead characters, they are also often outstandingly scored, there can be some fun support characters and some are well-timed and amusing.'Making Em Move' is reasonably different for Aesop's Fables/Van Beuren, they did not do parodies/pastiches a lot. Remember them much more for their absurdist strangeness (when executed well, when the atmosphere is strong and there are enough gags and good enough timing to pull it off) and their attempts at cutesiness (something that rarely works, because they end up overdoing it). The good news is that 'Making Em Move' does a pretty good job on the parodying side, there are far better parody/pastiche cartoons out there and on the most part with higher budgets and more iconic characters. It's not what one would call hilarious, but it's clever and ironic, the worst cartoon and film conventions are parodied to pretty amusing, if with a tendency to be strange, effect (like if something was silly, melodramatic etc. it was clearly intentional) and one who knows this cartoon and film period well will have no trouble recognising. There are a good number of gags and they are timed well, it's not laugh a minute and one won't bust a gut laughing throughout but it's not a case of sluggish timing, gags being too few and the humour being bland. Actually the humour is ironic and often wonderfully strange, perhaps not quite absurdist or bizarre but at least it doesn't try to go too much the other way (cute and saccharine).Characters, while not exactly memorable, are engaging, likewise with the formulaic but not too cheesy writing, and the audience reactions, although their animation is somewhat cheap and repetitive, cause some amusement.Best of all is the music score which agreed has always been an essential part of a Van Beuren cartoon and the one asset that is consistently outstanding and what stops the worst efforts from being worse. It is typically peppy and great fun to listen to. It is so beautifully and cleverly orchestrated and full of lively energy, doing so well with enhancing the action.It is easy to see though why 'Making Em Move' won't click with some, especially if unfamiliar with the period, if Van Beuren cartoons tend not to do much for you, if or if you have an allergy for what is being parodied. The story is non-existent and while mostly it's better paced than most Aesop's Fables/Van Beuren cartoons it does have some erratic moments that affects the synchronisation at times and how it gels with the visuals and audio.As to be expected, seeing as it is nearly always the case (with a few exceptions) even in their best efforts with Aesop's Fables/Van Beuren, the animation is less than great, most of the time with erratically sloppy character designs in particular while the simplistic background detail and lack of fluidity and crispness are just as difficult to ignore. The ending does go on for too long, it's stretched well beyond the limit and feels like an eternity for the cartoon to end. Overall, decent and amusing, pretty clever for Van Beuren and one of their more watchable 1931 batch of cartoons, but not them on the absolute best of top form and not without its problems. 6/10 Bethany Cox

An early sound cartoon from the company responsible for all those Aesop's Fables cartoons, this is animation of the really dated kind. It's the type where the only really recognisable creatures are the elephants who wear clothes. All the other creatures look similar to each other but don't truly resemble real animals. They often kind of bounce where they stand with fixed smiles on their faces.Anyway, this black-and-white cartoon is reasonably amusing but rarely raises a laugh and would probably seem pretty dull if watched again. A squeaky-voiced woman creature is taken on a tour of a cartoon factory by an old doorman and we see how cartoons are drawn. Basically, it's a production line comprising of rows of desks at which creatures each draw one component of a cartoon character before passing the sheet of paper to the drone on their left. They work to music - a frenetic rhythm designed to keep up the work-rate. Watching it, you can't help wondering whether there was some kind of veiled grievance being voiced by the real animators - after all, the van Bueren studios used to turn out one film every week...

As a history teacher and lover of films, I occasionally like watching cartoons that have been banned, as they tell us a lot about our society and how far we have come over the years. What was perfectly acceptable decades ago is now, in some cases, seen as gross and inappropriate. Occasionally, these cartoons which have been removed from screening aren't particularly offensive but often, as in the case of this cartoon, they are so god-awful it's hard to imagine that people would have laughed at and enjoyed these films! Thirteen of these cartoons have been packaged together on a DVD entitled "Cartoon Crazys: Banned and Censored" and while the print quality of many of the cartoons is less than stellar, it's a great chance to see how sensibilities have changed.Oddly, I really saw nothing offensive about this cartoon and it was the most perplexing film in the set because of this. Instead, it's a cute look at how cartoons are supposedly made--and fortunately the film never took this very seriously! While this was cute, it wasn't super funny--but compared to the average film of the time, it was. Thankfully, cartoons improved by light-years in the following decade!

"In a Cartoon Studio" is a pastiche on how cartoons (and movies) are made. Some of it is surprisingly accurate. Some is done for laughs, like the assembly-line cartoon production set-up where a given artist is responsible for each character's right foot, as the drawings move past on the conveyor. (Actually that's how "starving artists" original oil paintings are made today.)This film includes a cartoon within a cartoon in which Little Nell is kidnapped by a villain and tossed onto a log at the sawmill. It's a send-up, done for laughs, but it's also an ironic take on the worst movie-making conventions of the day. The dialogue is strictly formulaic. The cliffhanger ending is stretched out endlessly. And the audience (of cartoon animals) just eats it up, like the undiscriminating sheep and cattle they are. Literally. (Well, cows and hippos, to be exact.)Someone must have had a lot of good reasons for such cynicism, to make 1931 sound so much like 1999.