just watch it!

Instead, you get a movie that's enjoyable enough, but leaves you feeling like it could have been much, much more.

Great movie! If you want to be entertained and have a few good laughs, see this movie. The music is also very good,

This is one of the best movies I’ve seen in a very long time. You have to go and see this on the big screen.

This so-called giallo (rather late entry into the genre if this was filmed in 1994) tells the story of a masked murderer who is attacking women and a police detective trying to find out the killer's identity before a beautiful comic book illustrator becomes the next victim."Madness" AKA "Eyes Without A Face (which comes up in the closing credits), is a pretty sloppily put together piece of cinema. Although it's currently extremely hard to track down a copy (there is no current VHS or DVD release, bootleg copies only, it seems), it doesn't reward anyone who goes to the trouble of finding it. The plot is pretty thin, the killer seems to be copying a character in a comic book called "Doctor Dark" and the pretty young illustrator of the comic seems to be the focus of the killer's attention. First of all you need to know that the pretty young illustrator is played by one of the worst actresses in any Italian giallo I have ever seen. Together with they guy who plays her boyfriend, she pretty much drags the whole story into the gutter. There are unfortunately several scenes where she is called upon to scream and panic or freak out in terror after nightmares, and she completely ruins it every time. In scenes where she is in hysterics and being "calmed" by her boyfriend, the pair of them look as though they are barking at each other like hyperactive dogs. The English dub is terrible, but for once that isn't to blame for this poor display of ham acting.One factor that might have saved the film is the grisly murders, as the murderer's methods are quite shocking: first he incapacitates his victims with a hypodermic syringe to the neck, then gouges out their eyes with some kind of extended fork, then he sticks broken glass into the empty sockets, and finally he shoves the fork up their nose to impale their brain. He then makes off with the eyeballs! This all sounds awesome/disgusting, but the presentation of it on screen is very disappointing. It only really happens once, and this is in the first 10 minutes of the film. The shots of the dead victim's mutilated face look quite gruesome, but the actual murder itself is very badly filmed - and no other deaths in the film are shown in any detail at all.So what we do have is a central cast of really bad actors (the slimy police inspectors are as bad as the central couple), and bunch of poor special effects with perhaps the one good shot of the first victim (oh and while she's alive she can't act either), and a "whodunnit" plot which to be fair does deliver a twist ending that you might not guess. But there's very little to enjoy. The central idea of the killer copying a comic book character might have gone somewhere but even that is wasted - the few times that any illustrations from the comic are seen on camera reveals some really pitifully poor drawings that would never make publication let alone be a "sensation".It's disappointing to search for a rare film and then be let down like I was by "Madness" - and to think people are reviewing it as one of Bruno Mattei's better films...oh dear

Madness (1994) ** (out of 4) Bizarre giallo from Bruno Mattei about a psychopath stalking the streets and not only killing people but also removing their eyeballs. The story centers around a writer (Monica Seller) who's books include a character who removes the eyes of their victim and the police think that maybe the killer is working his way up to her. Director Mattei was known for ripping off various movies in his career and this one here goes after Dario Argento's TENEBRE and really doesn't do it too much justice. If you're looking for a serious giallo then this here certainly isn't it. If you're just looking for a gory film with some laughs then you might enjoy MADNESS. There are all sorts of problems with this film but there's no doubt that not too much thought was put into the picture. If you've seen the Argento film then you're not going to be shocked by anything here other than the writer ripping off lines of dialogue and the entire story structure. What sets this film apart from others in the genre is that there are a few gruesome death scenes where we see the eyes ripped out of people. Sadly this doesn't happen enough or else the film might have been somewhat better. Even stranger is some of the dialogue including a scene where the police are trying to come up with possible suspects and one brings a guy up who slaughtered countless hookers. The only cop tells him that the guy has an alibi, which tells you that this murderer is out walking the streets and I'm guessing spent no time in jail. Another funny moment comes from the main character and her constant screams of terror. Performances are okay for the most part but with the English dubbing it's really hard to fully judge them. The brief nudity and sex comes towards the end of the film so one shouldn't expect too much of that. This film really isn't going to appeal to too many and I think most people who check it out will be Argento fans wanting to see what Mattei did to that story.

Life imitates art when "Doctor Dark", a popular comic book depicting the adventures of a college professor-cum-serial killer, begins offing babysitters in its storyline. The real-life counterpart removes the eyes from its victims and leaves them as gifts for its creator, graphic artist Giovanna Dei, who is also taking a ton of heat from the press as she vigorously defends her art while denying any connection between current pop-culture and real-life violence ("If they kill someone with a power drill, do they take it out on Black and Decker?"). When the police arrest a crusading reporter for stalking Giovanna and attacking her boyfriend, Inspector Callistrati thinks he's caught the killer -but those connected to the comic continue to die...EYES WITHOUT A FACE has no connection to Georges Franju's 1959 horror classic but does tread the familiar territory of the 1970s Italian giallo cycle. Fumetti characters coming to life and going on a killing spree had been done before in 1973's SEXY CAT and a number of the genre's conventions get a good workout here: an imperiled protagonist, a multitude of red herrings, a black-gloved/trench-coated killer with an undetectable motive going back to childhood, and a few mild set-pieces and surprises thrown in for good measure. Schlock director Bruno Mattei doesn't have a particularly good reputation overall but acquits himself rather nicely in this, his only giallo outing. The by-now oft-told tale has a timeliness that can still resonate: the entire premise/plot line was reworked in a recent episode of U.S. TV's CRIMINAL MINDS and the message seems to be that, yes, fantasy violence is a vicious circle and can be very dangerous, indeed.

This rare film by Italian sleaze director Bruno Mattei is not - as the English title "Eyes Without a Face" suggests - a remake of Georges Franju's all time horror classic "Les Yeux Sans Visage" (which, as every genre buff should know, inspired Jess Franco's "Les Prédateurs de la Nuit" in 1988, one of Franco's best). "Gli Occhi Dentro" is a thriller in best Giallo tradition and often reminds of the typical genre outings of the 1970s. And this is quite a surprise considering that Bruno Mattei is known for trashy horror and exploitation films, but hasn't made a Giallo before this one.A serial killer murders baby sitters and plugs their eyes out. The killings resemble crimes from the latest issue of a successful comic book series called "Doctor Dark" about a schizophrenic who is a renowned professor by day and a maniac killer at night. The artist of the comic series is a young woman, and obviously the killer tries to make her suffer for his crimes: she starts finding the plugged out eyes of the victims at her home. After half an hour of the film, it seems that the maniac is caught. But it doesn't take much time to find out that the man apprehended is not the real killer.The story certainly ain't that original. The actors surely aren't very good. And Bruno Mattei never was a great artist as a director. But all of his films - no matter how shabby - show certain style and atmosphere. And in "Gli Occhi Dentro", he really manages to develop suspense and thrills, and also to deliver enough convincing red herrings for a couple of genre outings. After a swift start and a really cool first half an hour, the film loses a bit of its pace. But Mattei keeps the viewer interested while the plot continues unfolding, and the last half hour culminates in a manic climax to make this undeniably low budgeted thriller big fun for every Giallo freak - and probably makes one sigh nostalgicly towards the 1970s, the Golden Age of Giallo films.Concerning the plot (which is perfectly coherent for Mattei and average Giallo standards), the pace and the thrills, "Gli Occhi Dentro" is probably the most watchable of all films Mattei directed. Some scenes, though, remind the viewer that Mattei is an old "sleazeball": e.g. the phony close-up of the plugging out of the first victim's eye and a rather unmotivated love scene just before the climax starts. Concerning the gore, Mattei doesn't deliver it over the top. Nevertheless there are some bloody scenes and the murders that aren't as graphic are still quite grisly. All in all, this is a surprisingly well crafted thriller that delivers good thrilling entertainment and doesn't deserve to be as hard to get as it is at the moment. Rating: 7 out of 10.