Very very predictable, including the post credit scene !!!

the audience applauded

Thanks for the memories!

Excellent, Without a doubt!!

The premise and concept of making every frame a painting Is beyond words spectacular and needs to be appreciated but with such an amazing visual, the movie could have been a lot better by telling more of Vincent instead of focusing on a man going back and forth to see how people thought Vincent died or how they would portray him, Vincent was a genius and this is just briefly mentioned on the movie, they could have talked much more about how Vincent tried to be happy and tried to see the world so colorful and full of life even when he himself was awfully depressed and slowly going mad instead of making the movie only focusing on his lower points wich Is BEYOND unfair to such an intriguing personality like Vincent Van Gogh

Surely the ugliest and most stupid piece of kitsch ever produced on film. Could only be made with wasted public funds. Not one frame of the 65,000 is worth preserving - has ANYBODY ever sat through the full length of this hideous, tedious farrago? Tried to give it 0/10 but the IMDB system beat me. Once you touch a star you can't retract it. This was easily the worst film I've ever started to watch. Did any of those third-rate imitating painters consider that their dumb-assed daubings were actually an INSULT to their master?

This film was indeed made straight from the heart of whoever conceived this idea and the 125 artists who painstakingly handpainted its 65,000 frames. It is without a doubt so visually stunning and on top of that, the cinematography and storyline is actually great. Every scene is well thought out, even the voice acting is impeccable, and overall it is just an incredible piece of art, which also happens to be about one of the greatest artists in history. 30 years from now I am looking forward to showing this to my grandchildren. 10/10!

I guess you just can't fight Disney in Hollywood. Did I hear right that the Motion Picture Academy considers Coco to be a better movie than Loving Vincent? I am still scratching my head wondering how a run of the mill kid's film could possibly be better than a true artistic masterpiece. Is it because oil painting is such a primitive technology compared to computer-generated animation? Yes, animating with oils results in slightly jerky animation. Never mind that. Just back and watch how impressionist art becomes a living, moving medium to portray art history. Loving Vincent was a labour of love, not the product of data miners and corporate boardroomsToo many other reviews on IMDB have repeated the storyline but that's not what Vincent is all about. The storyline is simply a vehicle to move us from one famous Van Gogh to another while revealing a little bit of the history and the people and scenes Vincent painted. That makes the art of Van Gogh accessible as well as allowing us to understand his struggles with madness and poverty. That makes this that rare item, an art film that's entertaining as well.Even though the story is the least important aspect of Loving Vincent, the screen writing leaves us with a mystery. Perhaps Vincent didn't commit suicide. Perhaps he was shot either deliberately or accidentally by what we would today call the town bully. See Loving Vincent and decide for yourself.