Living on Velvet
Living on Velvet
NR | 02 March 1935 (USA)
Living on Velvet Trailers

A lay-about falls for his best friend's fiancee. The two of them run away from a life of privilege to one of middle-class normalcy. When an influx of money enters their life, their differences come to light.

Reviews
Platicsco

Good story, Not enough for a whole film

... View More
InformationRap

This is one of the few movies I've ever seen where the whole audience broke into spontaneous, loud applause a third of the way in.

... View More
AshUnow

This is a small, humorous movie in some ways, but it has a huge heart. What a nice experience.

... View More
Arianna Moses

Let me be very fair here, this is not the best movie in my opinion. But, this movie is fun, it has purpose and is very enjoyable to watch.

... View More
jarrodmcdonald-1

For anyone who doesn't know what the title means, it's certainly spelled out in the picture's story. I won't give the whole thing away but I did find it interesting the way George Brent's character transfers his ideas of living on velvet on to his wife, played by Kay Francis. They both suffer a lot in this film, but since this is a melodrama geared for female audiences, her torment is designed to be a lot more noble than his. Warren William, billed over Brent, appears as the couple's best friend, in more of a supporting role; he probably suffers too but his reduced screen time doesn't allow us to glimpse his particular turmoil and neurosis. Tearjerking aside, I found the performances to be sincerely played, and the woman (Helen Lowell) cast as Kay's impatient aunt was particularly good. Some of the denouement didn't make sense in the last few minutes, because a character who was supposed to die was suddenly allowed to live (per Jack Warner's wishes). Even if said character had died, I am not too sure how it would have reinforced a point the writers were trying to make. Maybe it was all supposed to lead to a realization that pain and suffering can be erased somehow, once you stop living on velvet.

... View More
calvinnme

I say "oddly" because I cannot nail down precisely why I like it so much. There's just something magical and Christmas-like - in a renewed hope kind of way - about this film.I admit that I would find Terry Parker (George Brent) an unendurable jerk if it were not for the first scene showing the airplane wreck plus his one serious speech to his good friend and benefactor Gibraltar (Warren William) about why he is wrecking his own life with wild abandon. One act of carelessness - not being sure he had enough fuel when he piloted his family to an event - has resulted in all of their deaths while he walked away unharmed, and now he is being intentionally reckless and insuring that he will never be successful or happy. He feels he's living on borrowed time and he wants to be sure he can't pay back the loan.However, he can't help but reach for some bit of happiness when he meets Amy (Kay Francis) at a party. The two run out on the party, have a grand night together strolling through the park, riding in a carriage, and dunking donuts at dawn in a dingy diner. Then Terry learns that Amy is "Gibraltar's Amy" - the girl that his only true friend in the world loves and just told him about the day before. He won't betray that friendship, so in spite of Amy's pleas that the feeling is not mutual between herself and Gibralter, he refuses to see her any more and goes on a bender to try to get her out of his system. Uncharacteristic for almost any role Warren William ever played, he selflessly finds Terry, sobers him up, brings him back to Amy, and steps out of the way so that Terry and Amy can be together. Amy and Terry are immediately married, and Gibraltar lets them lease a lovely vacant house he owns on Long Island for only 4.50 a month.The two are fabulously happy at first, but then Terry starts in with his passive aggressive destruction of their marriage. He just can't let himself be happy. The whole thing ends rather abruptly and rather unbelievably in the way that so many 30's Warner films did, but the final scene is sure to warm your heart.What's great about this movie? It has a rather offbeat and unique premise even if word by word the dialogue is forgettable, Kay Francis and George Brent had amazing chemistry here as in all of their films, and there's that great romantic score playing through most of the film. I always thought that Warner's did these 30's high society dramas actually better than MGM, even though that was somewhat MGM's stock and trade, because Warner's knew to keep things moving and to the point rather than let things drag on as was the case in several similar films by MGM of that same era. Highly recommended.

... View More
MartinHafer

Wow...talk about a ROTTEN pilot. The film begins with George Brent flying his sister, mother and father some place. However, the plane runs out of fuel. Now this is really a bad scene, as instead of just gliding down as any SANE pilot would do in a case like this, the plane inexplicably goes into a spin(!) and crashes into the ground. No sane pilot can be this bad but the film expects the audience to accept that it was just a mistake! What a sloppy setup.Following the crash, Brent goes through a period of a few years where he is aimless reckless. He travels the world--nearly getting killed or landing in jail repeatedly. Eventually he ends up back in the US and you see him buzzing a squadron of military planes--something that the film said was not against the law--though it clearly was and would have resulted at least in his pilots license being suspended or revoked! IT seemed odd that the deaths of his family caused him to become a jerk and not a morbid and brooding character. What a sloppy follow-up to the crash.After the US Air Corps incident, an old friend (Warren William) takes Brent under his wing--and introduces him to his society friends. Why introduce this nut-job to these folks is a bit beyond me! When Brent meets the woman William plans on marrying (Kay Francis), Francis almost immediately falls in love with Brent and they marry. While the idea of a smart and well-educated lady marrying a definite 'fixer upper' is silly, it does happen in real life. But, William magnanimously stepping aside good naturedly when this occurred is sloppy and tough to believe. It's a shame to see such a usually confident and good actor like William playing such a mushy wuss.Fortunately, while none of the film particularly made sense or was believable so far, at least the marriage went as you might expect in the real world. Brent continues to be incredibly irresponsible--having an aversion to work. At first, Francis is very long-suffering--but over time, Brent's attitude and actions take a toll on the marriage. She is incredibly co-dependent and always blames herself from not being able to change her loopy husband. And, even after they split up, the film seems to take the Tammy Wynette approach to life..."Stand By Your Man"....regardless!!! In other words, if you love an irresponsible man ENOUGH, things will magically work! What idiots!! What drivel!! Overall, this film is a great case of very good actors in a poorly written film. The characters rarely behave in a realistic or believable manner and it got boring watching them behave so stupidly. Brent, Francis and William were frankly ill-suited to such a crappy film that looks more like an insignificant B-movie than a film starring some of the top actors of the day. While I would watch anything these actors would appear in because I like them so much, most viewers won't be so charitable. And, since life is so short, why waste it with a film that had no right to be this bad.By the way, the worst line in the movie has to be "Poor devil...flying in the fog" as Brent looks out the window as a plane passes overhead. Talk about subtle!!!

... View More
Kalaman

"Living on Velvet" is a passionate, though slightly incoherent Borzage melodrama starring Kay Francis and George Brent. I'm a fan of director Borzage and the always wavishing Kay Fwancis (she had trouble pronouncing the Rs), so I was very eager to see this one. I happened to watch "Living on Velvet" the other night together with another Borzage love story with Francis & Brent called "Stranded", also made in 1935 for Warner Brothers. Of the two films, "Living on Velvet" is the best and most uncompromising illustration of Borzage's lifelong preoccupation with spirituality and humanity. Francis is wonderful in the role of Amy Prentiss, the passionate, devoted wife of Terry Parker (Brent), a rather reckless pilot who miraculously survived a plane crash with his family. The most romantic & unforgettable moment is of course the scene in which Terry meets Amy, seriously looking each other for the first time, their charging eyes never even blinking. The scene is one of Borzage's greatest achievements. It illustrates his genuine commitment to his material; the couple is looking at love itself, something concrete and tangible. Our involvement and identification are heightened through the emotional intensity of the couple's passion. The capable supporting players include Warren William as Gibraltar, Terry's best friend, and Helen Lowell as Aunt Martha.

... View More