Tied for the best movie I have ever seen

One of the best films i have seen

Excellent, a Must See

A very feeble attempt at affirmatie action

When you watch HUDDLE, don't be surprised if it feels like you've seen this film before. That's because in the 1920s and into the 30s, there were many films with similar themes. The formula is like this: A young man who is either selfish or cocky goes to college and makes the football team. However, he does something or the team THINKS he does something and he is an outcast. Later, however, he makes good and does not let everyone know. When they discover this, he is once again loved and praised and the film concludes. Just one of many examples is the William Haines film, BROWN OF HARVARD, but there were many more.So already, it's obvious that this film isn't all that new or ground-breaking. Now this isn't to say that it's not worth a peek. The film does have a few minor story innovations and the film is still very watchable. However, with Ramon Novarro's rather lackluster performance and strong accent (making it difficult for a hard of hearing person like myself to understand him--thanks to no closed captioning), it's a film that I would not rush out to see unless you love this style of film.FYI--While this film was set at Yale University, only one very brief scene is of the classroom. And in this one case, the professor decides to cancel class and sends everyone back to the dorms! According to this film, Yale was an incredibly easy school to attend back in 1932!!! No classes--just football and girls!

Ramon Novarro (as Tony Amatto) works in a steel mill; he is the son of Italian immigrants, and seems likely to remain a member of the working class. Then, as luck would have it, he wins a college scholarship. At Yale, Mr. Novarro becomes a football star; but, he still faces class discrimination.Don't miss the opening sequence of this film; it's a terrific introduction to the film, and defines Novarro's character: Novarro is seen in his "working class" job; he gets into a fistfight, encounters a beautiful woman, and ends up under a pile of rubble. The woman with the irresistible legs is Madge Evans (as Rosalie Stone); she is both beautiful, and "upper class". Novarro re-encounters her later in the film, along with Una Merkel (as Thelma) and Martha Sleeper (as Barbara Winston). Novarro's nemesis is Ms. Evans' brother Kane Richman (as Tom Stone); and, his roommates are John Arledge (as Jim "Pidge" Pidgeon) and Frank Albertson (as Larry). Silent star Ralph Graves is a sound coach Malcolm Gale.Mr. Arledge, as Novarro's second roommate "Pidge" is the best supporting performer (beating off some stiff competition). "I've lived with twelve fellas in my time and only liked three of them," Arledge explains, after Novarro chases him around the dorm, trying to get some first aid down his pants.The film is a little too long for its own good; and, it wavers too far from the main story of a poor working class youth winning a chance to attend college, and break class barriers. It's difficult to determine what Novarro is actually learning at Yale. He already knew how to fight, and doesn't seem to have accumulated too many career options - though, he is certainly better off with a Yale diploma. Novarro (#44) and the cast are appealing, even when the story wavers. The end game plays well. ****** Huddle (5/14/32) Sam Wood ~ Ramon Novarro, John Arledge, Madge Evans

After hearing mostly negative comments about this film, I was impressed. It offered an interesting view into the elitist collegiate atmosphere of the time, was frank about relationships, and had another fine performance by Ramon Novarro.Novarro looked more convincing as a student than some of the other players, and yet was thirty-three at the time. He certainly looked more age-appropriate than William Haines in West Point, and Haines was five years Novarro's junior when that film was made. I liked that fact that Novarro's character was made more life-like by conflicting traits as well. He was studious, promiscuous, proud, humble, a "dirty" fighter, and yet devoted to "weak" friends as well. Madge Evans' presence was not appreciably felt in this film, although her close-up during the commencement scene was a true eye-opener for me. Never had I seen her look so beautiful! Also, after seeing Martha Sleeper's "vamp," I'd love to view more films of hers.What interested me greatly was the depiction of college life in the film. How these snobbish upper-crust sorts had, at the same time, a code of honor, and would fill noble places in society is an interesting question. There were times when their treatment of Novarro was revolting, but yet they seemed good fellows at the end--how true in life. I doubt that the same sense of honor and tradition is present at these blue-blood universities today. I agree with the other viewer about the sound recording. It was abominable in some scenes, particularly when one had the already daunting task of penetrating thick Italian accents.A viewer should be pleased by this film. However, the fact that its reach exceeded its grasp should be no surprise when one considers that MGM through second-rate films destroyed the careers of its leading silent actors Gilbert, Haines, Keaton, and yes, Ramon Novarro. If they had really cared (say as much as they cared about Robert Montgomery's films), this film would be more focused.

There is no doubt that there is a potentially great film hiding in HUDDLE, but sadly it gets lost somewhere. The movie is a serious attempt to look at the consequences of the class system in a supposedly egalitarian America. RAMON NOVARRO is excellent as the poor son of Italian immigrants struggling to be accepted as a student at Yale. He comes up against the class system at every turn, including his love-life, and he feels he must constantly prove himself to be accepted by his peers. This results in him putting himself in great physical danger in a very well-acted climactic sequence. Novarro was truly a fabulous actor, much under-rated.But the film goes on way too long, and loses its focus. In attempting to include lots of college hi-jinks and comedy sequences, the theme gets lost, and much of the film plays poorly in comparison with the great 1926 silent film BROWN OF HARVARD, which covers similar territory. It's all a bit of a shame given that all the players are terrific and the theme quite radical for its day. For a 1932 film too the sound-recording is quite bad, with the annoying song sequences badly out of sync (did Yale students really sing that much!?).But there are some rather risque sequences, a touch of gay sub-text (involving Ramon's room-mate, played very well indeed by JOHN ARLEDGE - again BROWN OF HARVARD handles this situation much better), lots of male and female youthful beauty to admire (Ramon looks great, and KANE RICHMOND must be one of the best looking men ever filmed), and sufficient action to see you through to the end. If only the script editor, and then the film editor, had been a little more vigilant, this may have turned out to be a really great film. Who was it who said "every film is a missed opportunity"?