Masterful Cinema

Tells a fascinating and unsettling true story, and does so well, without pretending to have all the answers.

The plot isn't so bad, but the pace of storytelling is too slow which makes people bored. Certain moments are so obvious and unnecessary for the main plot. I would've fast-forwarded those moments if it was an online streaming. The ending looks like implying a sequel, not sure if this movie will get one

Actress is magnificent and exudes a hypnotic screen presence in this affecting drama.

This a film for the thoughtful. It relies on intelligent dialogue,great acting and period recreation. If you want action, look somewhere else,but this film is simply DRIPPING with dramatic tension from start to finish.It is gripping portrait of the times and politics when the church sought to consolidate it's power over a changing world and persecuted many like Bruno, Copernicus, Galileo.Due to constraints of time it only outlines the free thinking ideas and philosophy of Bruno that led to his trial for heresy.If you want to understand them fully you must look to his writings. I saw one post that said he found it boring ; I can't believe that. I found it riveting from the first frame!

This is nothing less than a formidable film of almost excruciating force and power in its overwhelmingly correct realism in depicting the tremendous passion of this the greatest of free-thinkers, his denouncement by his best friend and host and the horrible inhumanity of the bureaucracy of the inquisition. When once in the hands of the inquisition, the system was simply so constructed, that it was impossible to get out again - no revocation could help, and all that Venice could do, being after all a republic out of papal control, was to wash their hands and hand the case over to others, leading to a constantly more desperately dwindling spiral of a process to perdition. Gian Maria Volonte is magnificent as Bruno, he couldn't have been made more convincing in his increasingly desperate argument and protests, showing also his very human sides, while the chief merit of the film is its marvellous visual language, often turning the film into pure expressionism, aided by the at times overwhelmingly apt music by Ennio Morricone. This is more than a film, it's an inspired passion of a film, showing Italian historical realism at its best. I didn't know this film existed before I stumbled upon it searching for something else, and starting to watch it there was nothing else to do but to see it through till the end. It should be made more widely known, and it is a good match and complement to the Neil Jordan's Borgia films last year.

Montaldo's precedent work was about America 's famous political prisoners Sacco and Vanzetti.Ennio Morricone's score was as excellent as usual and he asked Joan Baez to write four songs ,the words of three of them were taken from letters of Vanzetti.And there was Gian Maria Volonte who like Baez was a committed artist.Montaldo continued with politics in "Giordano Bruno".The scientist-philosopher ,played by Volonte again,was a visionary man extraordinaire ,so ahead of his time his thoughts seem sometimes contemporary.His world ,at the beginning of the modern times only knows two concepts:good and evil;it cannot free itself of the first conflict between God and Satan.God is not above ,says Bruno,he's everywhere ,in every plant,in every stone ,in every grain of sand of the creation.What the Holy(!) Office cannot forgive him ,outside this "heresy" is that he keeps on repeating that religion helps man dominate man,all that these cardinals are doing every day (who has the right to kill? says Bruno) Time had not come for science.Bruno's so called friend just wanted him to give him the power to dominate his fellow men.All that you could not understand was magic ,black magic .Like Sacco and Vanzetti,Bruno was a political prisoner ,a movie about him made sense after the 1971 work.And again,marvelous score by Morricone.

First of all, this movie is extremely boring. Secondly, it is hilariously absurd, lacks any brim of realism and is extremely poorly acted. Barbariously simplifying the life and the trial of Giordano Bruno, it practically says nothing at all about the personality and the ideas of this important scientist and philosopher. All that it offers are some garments supposedly (and most surely) belonging to that age and some stupid sentences uttered by all characters (of course, mainly by Giordano Bruno), suffocated by clichés and "philosophy" that one could hear daily in all sort of circumstances, all of them worse than mediocre. One of the worst movies I've ever seen (watching it three or four times a year would be more than incomprehensible)