Excellent, Without a doubt!!

everything you have heard about this movie is true.

Amateur movie with Big budget

A movie that not only functions as a solid scarefest but a razor-sharp satire.

In sunny California's Los Angeles area, clean-cut white youth gang members are ready to retaliate against a rival Hispanic gang. Later, a friendly police officer tries to talk a young Spanish-accented boy out of continuing his life of crime. Alienated in an "unfriendly" environment, the boy narrates this short drama. It's a social consciousness effort by Sid Davis and Arthur Swerdloff. Most likely, this was shown to 1950s schoolchildren in an attempt to fight juvenile delinquency. Those who've seen the 1961 musical "West Side Story" will notice plot similarities. That show was staged in 1957, and was first proposed as about similar Los Angeles gangs. Among other things, it had Sharks, a concerned officer, an integrated dance and "happiness" in the form of Natalie Wood. "Growing up in an angry world" is repeated as the story's main problem. There are no songs, but "Gang Boy" provides a solution in caring for younger siblings and finding common ground. The film is definitely not art, but it does effectively make its point.***** Gang Boy (1954) Sid Davis, Arthur Swerdloff ~ Curly Riviera

"Gang Boy" is a 27-minute live action film in color that was released in the United States back in 1954, which means it is already over 60 years old. The writer and director is Arthur Swerdloff and this one we have here is one of these many educational movies that are somewhat a mix of documentary and fiction. The story is not authentic, but the subject is and this is why I am a bit disappointed with the execution here. Gangs were indeed a big problem and you can see this if you have maybe seen some of the Marlon Brando films from back then where it is occasionally referenced in the plot. Anyway, back to this one here: The message may be honorable, but the acting, camera work and plot are mediocre at best, sometimes even pretty bad, which makes it not a satisfying watch at all. I give it a thumbs-down and I really hoped it could have been better because it was made at a time where this film really could have made a difference or educated people on the subject. But it's nothing worth checking out and I guess maybe the best would have been if Swerdloff had gone 100% documentary instead. It becomes painfully obvious that most of the people working on this one were amateurs.

Based on a true story that took place in California. There is a Mexican gang and a white gang who hate each other with a passion. They're going to have an all out war to see who's better. The police hear about this and talk to Danny the leader of the Mexican gang to try to prevent it. The movie goes back in time and shows how,and why, the Mexican gang started. Then it comes back and shows Danny making a decision. It all leads to an unbelievable but predictable happy ending.Back in 1954 this must have been hard-hitting. Fights between interracial gangs were not shown in movies at all. Seen today it comes across as obvious and simplistic. They used real gang members to play the roles of the kids to add authenticity...but they were horrible actors. There was some very obvious overdubbing and the "fights" were obviously staged and ineptly done--it's pretty obvious that none of the kids were hurt. Still this movie is well intentioned and shed some light on a subject that most Americans didn't know about. For that alone I give it a 6.

Interesting artifact, very much a reflection of its time. During those post-war years, juvenile delinquency grew as a national concern as a teenage sub-culture began to emerge. In urban areas, gang "rumbles" often made headlines as youths clashed with chains, fists, and sometimes, knives, as dramatized in this 30-minute short. These could be seen as "turf' wars or, at times, as racial clashes, but rarely—if I recall the LA area of this short correctly— was anyone killed. Note how the solution portrayed here can be described as a "liberal" one — that is, by appealing to youths' better instincts, instead of the more traditional reform school path.However, gangs-- at least in the last 50 years-- have evolved from street-level "clubs" into criminal enterprises, trafficking in drugs, guns, and other illicit activities that are often connected with adult-level prison gangs like the Mexican Mafia or the Aryan Brotherhood. Unlike the 1950's, rivalries are now routinely settled with "drive-by" shootings, at the same time, the bodies pile up in poorer and minority neighborhoods. Younger kids can easily be recruited since gang membership offers both status and the prospect of a money-making future. Just as importantly, liberal solutions, as portrayed in the Davis short, offer little prospect of success, while only those programs addressing the deeper causes of poverty and racism hold much promise.Nonetheless, this earnest little docu-drama presents an interesting contrast to such sensationalized youth films of the time as Rebel Without a Cause (1955) or The Blackboard Jungle (1955). I am curious, however, where the producers expected the 30-minutes to be shown and to what effect.